管理评论

›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (12): 17-26,61.

• 经济与金融管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

主客观权重的组合方式及其合理性研究

李刚1,2,3, 李建平3, 孙晓蕾3, 赵萌1,2   

  1. 1. 东北大学工商管理学院, 沈阳 110819;
    2. 东北大学秦皇岛分校经济学院, 秦皇岛 066004;
    3. 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院, 北京 100190
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-01 出版日期:2017-12-28 发布日期:2017-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 李刚(通讯作者),东北大学秦皇岛分校经济学院副教授,中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院博士后,硕士生导师,博士。
  • 作者简介:李建平,中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院研究员,博士生导师,博士;孙晓蕾,中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院副研究员;赵萌,东北大学秦皇岛分校副教授,硕士生导师,博士。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金青年项目（71601041；71601040；71301017）；河北省社会科学基金项目一般项目（HB15YJ117）；中国博士后科学基金资助项目（2016M590136）；中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目（2017T100111）。

Research on a Combined Method of Subjective-Objective Weighing and the Its Rationality

Li Gang1,2,3, Li Jianping3, Sun Xiaolei3, Zhao Meng1,2   

  1. 1. School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819;
    2. School of Economics, Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao 066004;
    3. Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190
  • Received:2016-08-01 Online:2017-12-28 Published:2017-12-20

PDF (PC)

2206

摘要：

本文主要对主观权重和客观权重的组合方式及其合理性进行了研究。首先，在对现有主客观组合赋权方法分析的基础上提出了主客观组合赋权的组合原则及合理性判别标准；然后，对比分析了加法合成法、乘法合成法、级差最大化组合赋权法和基于客观修正主观的组合赋权方法等四种典型的主客观组合赋权方法；最后，通过实证，分析了以上四种主客观组合赋权方法计算的组合权重的合理性及其可解释性等问题。研究结果表明：基于级差最大化的组合赋权方法和基于客观修正主观组合赋权法等两种组合赋权方法是合理的。工作的主要特色有三：一是定义了主客观组合权重的合理区间概念，为组合权重的合理性判别提供了理论依据；二是从指标层面讨论了指标的组合赋权方法，组合方式更加灵活，保证了组合权重对主客观权重优点的反映；三是提出了主客观组合赋权的组合原则及合理性判别标准，为主客观权重的组合方式研究提供了新的思路。

关键词: 主客观组合赋权, 组合权重的合理性, 级差最大化, 客观修正主观

Abstract:

The main purpose of this paper is to evaluate the combined method of Subjective-Objective Weighing and its rationality. First, we analyze the combined method and the principle of combining the two factors, and on this basis, we set the criteria for a feasible, explainable and distinctive combination. Second, we build up an optimized model for this combined method to maximize the deviations, point out a scientific range of indicators by the combined method under its model and explain the applicability of the method and the model into studying indicators. Third, we propose a combing model of revising subjective weighing method through an objective way. By doing so, we take advantage of the objective weighing to make up for the disadvantages of objective weighing while integrating and maintaining the advantages of both, which is a challenge to the traditional way of relying on objective methods only. Through comparing and analyzing such four subjective weighing methods as the maximized-deviation-based weighing, G1 revised by standard deviation, addition as well as multiplication, the study proves that the two combined methods that this paper focuses on are more explainable and distinctive.

Key words: combined subjective-objective weighting, rationality of combined weighting, level difference maximization, subjectivity revised by objectivity