不同环境政策工具对技术创新的影响分析——基于2004-2011年我国省级面板数据的实证研究

›› 2016, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 53-61.

不同环境政策工具对技术创新的影响分析——基于2004-2011年我国省级面板数据的实证研究

余伟¹, 陈强², 陈华¹

1. 南昌大学管理学院, 南昌 330031;
2. 同济大学经济与管理学院, 上海 200092

收稿日期:2014-01-19 出版日期:2016-01-30 发布日期:2016-02-01
作者简介:余伟,南昌大学管理学院讲师,博士;陈强,同济大学经济与管理学院教授,博士生导师。
基金资助:
国家软科学研究计划项目(2013GXS1D005)。

Analysis of the Impact of Different Environmental Policy Instruments on Technology Innovation: Evidence from China's 30 Provinces' Panel Data from 2004-2011

Yu Wei¹, Chen Qiang², Chen Hua¹

1. School of Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031;
2. School of Economics & Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092

Received:2014-01-19 Online:2016-01-30 Published:2016-02-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用2004-2011年我国省级面板数据,将环境政策工具分为直接管制、经济手段和"软"手段,并分别以"三同时"环保投资、人均排污费收费和环境新闻报道量作为度量指标,并控制工业企业规模、所有制结构、贸易开放、经济发展水平等因素,分析不同类型环境政策工具对区域技术创新的影响。研究结果表明,从全国层面看,直接管制和经济手段对R&D投入都有效果不显著的促进作用,但"软"手段对R&D投入具有显著的促进作用。分区域看,直接管制对东部和内陆地区R&D投入都有效果不显著的促进作用;经济手段对东部R&D投入具有效果不显著的抑制作用,但对内陆地区R&D投入具有显著的促进作用;"软"手段对东部R&D投入具有显著的促进作用,但对内陆地区R&D投入具有效果不显著的促进作用。

关键词: 直接管制, 经济手段, ", 软", 手段, R&, D投入, 面板模型

Abstract:

This paper analyses the impact of different type environmental policy instruments on technology innovation based on the panel data of China's provinces over the period of 2004-2011. We classify environmental policy tools into three major categories: direct regulation, economic instruments and soft instruments, using "three-simultaneity" investment, sewage charges and environment news quantity as the proxy variables respectively. The results show that the direct regulation and economic instruments have significant positive impact on R&D expenditure of China, and the effect is not significant, while the soft instruments have a significant positive impact on R&D expenditure of China. This paper also finds that the result is diverse in different regions. The direct regulation has a positive impact on R&D expenditure of eastern and inland region, and the effect is not significant. The economic instruments have a negative impact on R&D expenditure of eastern region, while have a significant positive impact on R&D expenditure of inland region. The soft instruments have a significant positive on R&D expenditure of eastern, while have no significant positive on R&D expenditure of inland region.

Key words: direct regulation, economic instruments, soft instruments, R&D expenditure, panel model

余伟, 陈强, 陈华. 不同环境政策工具对技术创新的影响分析——基于2004-2011年我国省级面板数据的实证研究[J]. , 2016, 28(1): 53-61.

Yu Wei, Chen Qiang, Chen Hua. Analysis of the Impact of Different Environmental Policy Instruments on Technology Innovation: Evidence from China's 30 Provinces' Panel Data from 2004-2011[J]. , 2016, 28(1): 53-61.

参考文献

[1] Iraldo F., Testa F., Melis M., et al. A Literature Review on the Links between Environmental Regulation and Competitiveness[J]. Environmental Policy and Governance, 2011,21(3):210-222
[2] 宋国君等.环境政策分析[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2008
[3] Hicks J. R. The Theory of Wages [M]. Macmillan: London, 1932
[4] Porter M. E., van der Linde C. Toward a New Conception of the Environment-competitiveness Relationship [J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995,9(4):97-118
[5] Hemmelskamp J. The Influence of Environmental Policy on Innovative Behavior-An Econometric Study[R]. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Working Paper, No.18.99, Milan, 1999
[6] Kuntze U. Regulation and Innovation: Empirical Links in Plastics Recycling[R]. Final Report, Karlsruhe (Fraunhofe-Institut für System-und Innovations Forschung(ISI)), 1999
[7] Jaffe A. B., Newell R. G., Stavins R. N. Environmental Policy and Technological Change[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2002,22(1):41-69
[8] Iraldo F., Testa F., Frey M. Is an Environmental Management System Able to Influence Environmental and Competitive Performance? The Case of an Eco-Management and Audit Scheme(EMAS) in the European Union[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2009,17(16):1444-1452
[9] Wirl F. Taxes versus Permits as Incentive for the Intertemporal Supply of a Clean Technology by a Monopoly[J]. Resource and Energy Economics, 2014,36(1):248-269
[10] Brouhle K., Graham B., Harrington D. R. Innovation under the Climate Wise Program[J]. Resource and Energy Economics, 2013,35(2):91-112
[11] Popp D. Pollution Control Innovations and the Clean Air Act of 1990[J]. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2004,22(4):60-641
[12] Johnstone N., Hascic I., Popp D. Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2011,45(1):55-133
[13] Testa F., Iraldo F., Frey M. The Effect of Environmental Regulation on Firms' Competitive Performance[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2011,92(9):2136-2144
[14] Testa F., Styles D., Iraldo F. Case Study Evidence that Direct Regulation Remains the Main Driver of Industrial Pollution Avoidance and May Benefit Operational Efficiency[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2012,21(1):1-10
[15] Hamamoto M. Environmental Regulation and the Productivity of Japanese Manufacturing Industries[J]. Resource and Energy Economics, 2006,28(4):299-312
[16] Kneller R., Manderson E. Environmental Regulations and Innovation Activity in UK Manufacturing Industries[J]. Resource and Energy Economics, 2012,34(2):211-235
[17] 贾瑞跃,魏玖长,赵定涛.环境规制和生产技术进步——基于规制工具视角的实证分析[J]. 中国科技大学学报, 2013,43(3):217-222
[18] Hausman J. Specification Tests in Econometrics[J]. Econometrica, 1978,46(6):1251-1271
[19] Jaffe A. B., Palmer K. Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1997,79(4):610-619
[20] 杨洪刚.中国环境政策工具的实施效果及其选择研究[D]. 复旦大学博士论文, 2009
[21] Aghion P., Bloom N., Blundell R., et al. Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2005,120(2):701-728
[22] 侯伟丽.中国经济增长与环境质量[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005
[23] Ambec S., Cohen M. A., Elgie S., et al. The Porter Hypothesis at 20.Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?[J]. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2015,9(2):1-22
[24] 世界银行环境局,K·哈密尔顿等著.里约后五年——环境政策的创新[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1998
[25] 周权雄,朱卫平.国企锦标赛激励效应与制约因素研究[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2010,(2):571-595