›› 2015, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (8): 23-32.

• 经济与金融管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于空间面板模型的我国地方政府环境规制竞争研究

王宇澄   

  1. 中国人民大学经济学院, 北京 100872
  • 收稿日期:2014-08-01 出版日期:2015-08-30 发布日期:2015-09-02
  • 作者简介:王宇澄,中国人民大学经济学院本科生。

Research on Environmental Regulation Competition of China Based on Spatial Panel Model

Wang Yucheng   

  1. School of Economics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872
  • Received:2014-08-01 Online:2015-08-30 Published:2015-09-02

摘要:

本文选取1996-2012年间我国31个省级地区(港澳台除外)的面板数据,通过空间计量方法,证明了我国地方政府间环境规制竞争的存在性,并且研究了竞争的表现形式。结果表明:我国省际环境规制竞争表现出跨界溢出效应。地方政府在工业二氧化硫、粉尘等治污减排成本大、环境规制正外部性强的污染物治理上存在"搭便车"动机。同时随政绩考核体系中环境质量占比的增加环境规制竞争逐渐减弱。另外随着经济发展水平的提高,地方政府间环境规制竞争强度呈现先增大后减小的特点,竞争行为主要发生在经济发展处于中等水平的中部地区,而东、西部地区相对较弱。因此,中央在考虑制定政绩考核体系和节能减排目标时,需考虑到地方政府环境规制竞争空间和污染物种类异质性。

关键词: 环境规制竞争, 空间计量模型, 省级面板

Abstract:

Based on the panel data of 31 provinces during 1996-2012(except Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan), utilizing spatial panel econometric methods, this paper empirically tests the existence and patterns of environmental regulation competition among Chinese local governments. Results show a significantly existence of Chinese provincial environmental regulation competition. It also shows significant spillover effects across borders, the local governments show obvious "free-rider" motivation on the industrial pollution abatements which cost more and have positive externalities, such as industrial sulfur dioxide and powder. At the same time the competition become weaker with the increase of the proportion of environmental quality in the performance appraisal system. In addition, we find that with the development of regional economy, the intensity of environmental regulation competition shows a trend of first increase and then decrease. The evidence of competition is founded mainly in the middle part of China where economic development is in medium level, while in the eastern and west regions, the competition is relatively insignificant. Therefore, the policy making of performance appraisal system and the implementation of industrial pollution abatement should consider the spatial heterogeneity of local government competition and types of pollutants.

Key words: environmental regulation competition, spatial econometric model, provincial panel