工薪所得免征额还应继续提高吗？——来自中国个税微观CGE模型的验证

›› 2015, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (7): 76-86.

• 组织行为与人力资源管理 • 上一篇下一篇

工薪所得免征额还应继续提高吗？——来自中国个税微观CGE模型的验证

王韬¹, 朱跃序¹, 鲁元平²

1. 华中科技大学管理学院, 武汉 430074;
2. 中南财经政法大学财政税务学院, 武汉 430073

收稿日期:2014-04-11 发布日期:2015-07-31
作者简介:王韬,华中科技大学管理学院教授,博士生导师,硕士;朱跃序,华中科技大学管理学院博士研究生;鲁元平,中南财经政法大学财政税务学院副教授,博士.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(71073059;71173083);国家自然科学基金青年项目(71403296).

Should the Exemption of Personal Income Tax Continue to Increase? ——An Analysis Based on Micro Computable General Equilibrium (CGE)

Wang Tao¹, Zhu Yuexu¹, Lu Yuanping²

1. School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074;
2. School of Public Finance and Taxation, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073

Received:2014-04-11 Published:2015-07-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文借鉴可计算一般均衡微观模拟的方法,利用CFPS2010基线调查数据将受免征额调整直接影响的工薪阶层进行微观处理,并以此为基础通过灵活分组对比分析了新旧税制下免征额调整对工薪阶层福利改善和收入分配状况调节情况.结果发现,即便免征额不进行调整,七级累进税制已经能够很好的发挥福利改善和收入分配调节的功能.然而我国工薪阶层的收入结构使得免征额的累进性在现行税制下明显弱化,免征额能够发挥的调节作用已经有限.同时,免征额调高在福利改善方面存在纵向的不公平,而统一的免征额设定也不利于区域间的横向公平.新税制使得纵向不公平更加"等级分明",横向不公平有所加剧.因此,无论是从效率还是公平的角度来看,目前不宜将目光过多的放在免征额是否进一步的提高上,个人所得税更需要税制结构上的改革.

关键词: 免征额, 可计算一般均衡, 福利改善, 收入分配

Abstract:

In this paper, we apply Computable General Equilibrium Micro-Simulation Approach (CGE-MSA), in order to investigate the change of welfare and income distribution of working-class after the improvement of the exemption. The establishment of the model is based on flexible grouping the working-class, and with the help of CFPS2010 baseline survey data, we introduce micro data into the model successfully. Main conclusion from this study is that the progressive of exemption has decreased significantly under the current tax system, regardless of whether it is for the degree of welfare improvement or the ability of income distribution. If the revenue structure of working class will not have big change, the regulation effect of exemption will be limited. Moreover, the degree of welfare improvement will be lower with higher levels of economic development, and unified exemption may have negative impact on inequity in underdeveloped areas. Therefore, the personal income tax need to make fundamental changes in the tax system, and excessively concerned about raising the exemption amount is unnecessary.

Key words: tax exemption, Computable General Equilibrium (CGE), welfare improvement, income distribution

王韬, 朱跃序, 鲁元平. 工薪所得免征额还应继续提高吗？——来自中国个税微观CGE模型的验证[J]. , 2015, 27(7): 76-86.

Wang Tao, Zhu Yuexu, Lu Yuanping. Should the Exemption of Personal Income Tax Continue to Increase? ——An Analysis Based on Micro Computable General Equilibrium (CGE)[J]. , 2015, 27(7): 76-86.

参考文献

[1] 刘元生,杨澄宇,袁强.个人所得税的收入分配效应[J]. 经济研究, 2013,48(1):99-109
[2] 刘扬,冉美丽,王忠丽.个人所得税、居民收入分配与公平——基于中美个人所得税实证比较[J]. 经济学动态, 2014,(1):9-17
[3] 岳希明,徐静,刘谦等.2011年个人所得税改革的收入再分配效应[J]. 经济研究, 2012,47(9):113-124
[4] Wagstaff A. Redistributive Effect, Progressivity and Differential Tax Treatment: Personal Income Taxes in Twelve OECD Countries[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 1999,72(1):73-98
[5] Immervoll H., Richardson L. Redistribution Policy and Inequality Reduction in OECD Countries: What Has Changed in Two Decades?[C]. No. 6030. Discussion Paper Series, 2011
[6] Chen W., Caminada K., Goudswaard K. The Redistributive Effect of Social Transfer Programmes and Taxes: A Decomposition Across Countries[J]. International Social Security Review, 2012,65(3):27-48
[7] Doerrenberg P., Peichl A. The Impact of Redistributive Policies on Inequality in OECD Countries[J]. Applied Economics, 2014,46(17):2066-2086
[8] Bird R. M., Zolt E. M. The Limited Role of the Personal Income Tax in Developing Countries[J]. Journal of Asian Economics, 2005,16(6):928-946
[9] De Freitas J. Inequality, the Politics of Redistribution and the Tax Mix[J]. Public Choice, 2012,151(3-4):611-630
[10] Goñi E., López J. H., Servén L. Fiscal Redistribution and Income Inequality in Latin America[J]. World Development, 2011,39(9):1558-1569
[11] Jaramillo M. The Incidence of Social Spending and Taxes in Peru[J]. Public Finance Review, 2013,40(1):1-22
[12] Krever R., Zhang H. Progressive Income Taxation and Urban Individual Income Inequality[J]. Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin, 2011,17(5):192-199
[13] 岳希明,徐静.我国个人所得税的居民收入分配效应[J]. 经济学动态, 2012,(6):16-25
[14] 徐建炜,马光荣,李实.个人所得税改善中国收入分配了吗——基于对1997-2011年微观数据的动态评估[J]. 中国社会科学, 2013,(6):53-71
[15] 刘晓强.基于CGE模型的个人所得税改革效应分析[D]. 华中科技大学硕士学位论文, 2011
[16] 许志伟,吴化斌,周晶.个人所得税改革的宏观福利分析[J]. 管理世界, 2013,(12):32-42
[17] 严斌剑,Hewings G.,周应恒等.包容性增长政策分析的研究方法和现状: 可计算一般均衡模型微观模拟技术研究述评[J]. 管理评论, 2013,25(2):3-11
[18] Decaluwé B., Patry A., Savard L., et al. Poverty Analysis within a General Equilibrium Framework[R]. African Economic Research Consortium, 1999
[19] Cororaton C. B., Cockburn J. Trade Reform and Poverty——Lessons from the Philippines: A CGE-Microsimulation Analysis[J]. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2007,29(1):141-163
[20] Löfgren H., Harris R. L., Robinson S. A Standard Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model in GAMS[R]. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, 2002
[21] 岳树民,卢艺,岳希明.免征额变动对个人所得税累进性的影响[J]. 财贸经济, 2011,32(2):18-24
[22] 中国经济的社会核算矩阵研究小组.中国经济的社会核算矩阵[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 1996,(1):42-48
[23] 范金,杨中卫,赵彤.中国宏观社会核算矩阵的编制[J]. 世界经济文汇, 2010,(4):103-119
[24] 袁永娜,石敏俊,李娜.碳排放许可的初始分配与区域协调发展——基于多区域CGE模型的模拟分析[J]. 管理评论, 2013,25(2):43-50
[25] 陈烨,张欣,寇恩惠.增值税转型对就业负面影响的CGE模拟分析[J]. 经济研究, 2010,45(9):29-42
[26] 王会芳,鲍勤,徐山鹰.中国金融可计算一般均衡模型及其在存款准备金政策研究中的应用[J]. 管理评论, 2013,25(8):3-9
[27] Musgrave R. A., Thin T. Income Tax Progression, 1929-48[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1949,56(3):498-514
[28] 程侃,李成.同排位同牺牲原则下个人所得税税率设计[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2013,30(5):140-151

工薪所得免征额还应继续提高吗？——来自中国个税微观CGE模型的验证

Should the Exemption of Personal Income Tax Continue to Increase? ——An Analysis Based on Micro Computable General Equilibrium (CGE)

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	许晨曦, 董启琛, 许江波. 自贸区政策的收入分配效应——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(2): 38-51.
[2]	陈璇, 高雪, 刘兰翠. 气候变化对收入不平等的影响研究综述[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(11): 16-25.
[3]	鲍勤, 苏丹华, 汪寿阳. 中美贸易摩擦对中国经济影响的系统分析[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(7): 3-16.
[4]	乔晗, 王杰, 卢涛. 收入分配研究述评与研究前沿分析——基于文献计量方法[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(11): 282-296.
[5]	李景睿. 收入分配、信贷约束对高等教育入学率的影响研究——基于146个经济体的实证分析[J]. , 2019, 31(6): 267-276.