Evolution of Science and Technology Policies in the Field of Energy Saving and Emission Reduction and Effectiveness of Policies' Synergy——Based on Policy Documents Quantitative Study

Abstract

Abstract:

Based on policy documents quantitative study and in view of the role that science and technology policies play in promoting technological progress and then driving energy saving and emission reduction, this paper characterizes the introduction of China's science and technology policies in the field of energy saving and emission reduction and the application of policy measures from 1998, reveals the evolution of policy measures and constructs an econometric model to analyze the effectiveness of synergy of policy measures and policy objectives. The analysis results show that:from 1998, total number of the science and technology policies in the field of energy saving and emission reduction remains rising, and contents of the policies become increasingly specific; administrative measures are the most often used measures, and the policy measures' form remains changing; each different policy objective matches diffident measures, the effect of different synergy of policy measures and policy objectives has significant discrepancy; in most cases, the effectiveness of synergy between policy objectives and two policy measures is better than that between policy objectives and only one policy measure. Finally, we put forward some relevant suggestions for improving the policy effect.

Key words: energy saving and emission reduction, science and technology policies, policy measure, policy documents quantitative study

Zhang Guoxing, Li Jiaxue, Hu Yi, Gao Yang, Wang Fanzhi. Evolution of Science and Technology Policies in the Field of Energy Saving and Emission Reduction and Effectiveness of Policies' Synergy——Based on Policy Documents Quantitative Study[J]. , 2017, 29(12): 72-83,126.

References

[1] 何小钢,张耀辉. 技术进步、节能减排与发展方式转型——基于中国工业36个行业的实证考察[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2012,(3):19-33
[2] 韩珺. 循环经济与节能减排解析[J]. 中国人口资源与环境, 2008,18(3):173-176
[3] 汪涛,汪樟发. 北京市现行科技政策法规体系扫描[J]. 科研管理, 2004,25(zk):9-13
[4] 刘凤朝,徐茜. 基于计算实验的中国科学技术政策变动效应预测[J]. 管理评论, 2011,24(12):40-51
[5] 杨健,韩立新. 科技创新政策及法律环境研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2010,31(1):23-26
[6] 栾春娟,侯海燕,王贤文. 国际科技政策研究热点与前沿的可视化分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2009,27(2):240-243
[7] Lundvall B. Å., Borrás S. Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy[J]//Oxford Handbook of Innovation[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2005
[8] 丁福虎. 科技政策的视同与规范[J]. 科研管理, 1999,20(5):33-381
[9] Bäckstrand K. Civic Science for Sustainability:Reframing the Role of Experts, Policy-makers and Citizens in Environmental Governance[J]. Global Environmental Politics, 2003,3(4):24-41
[10] Zhong X., Yang X. Science and Technology Policy Reform and Its Impact on China's National Innovation System[J]. Technology in Society, 2007,29(3):317-325
[11] Frischmann B. M. Innovation and Institutions:Rethinking the Economics of U.S. Science and Technology Policy[J]. Vermont Law Review, 2000,24(2):347-416
[12] Grupp H., Mogee M. E. Indicators for National Science and Technology Policy:How Robust Are Composite indicators?[J]. Research Policy, 2004,33(9):1373-1384
[13] 杨耀武,张仁开. 长三角区域科技创新政策评估及路线图研究[J]. 科研管理, 2010,31(zk):84-88
[14] 赵志耘,郑佳. 从专利分析走向看技术创新与经济周期的关系[J]. 中国软科学, 2010,(9):185-192
[15] Geiges H. Foundations of the Economics of Innovation:Theory, Measurement and Practice[M]. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing, 1998
[16] Mimura T., Shimojo S., Suda T., et al. Research and Development on Energy Saving Technology for Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Recovery and Steam System in Power Plant[J]. Energy conversion and management, 1995,36(6):397-400
[17] Wang G. H., Wang Y. X., Zhao T. Analysis of Interactions Among the Barriers to Energy Saving in China[J]. Energy Policy, 2008,36(6):1879-1889
[18] Park C. W., Kwon K. S., Kim W. B., et al. Energy Consumption Reduction Technology in Manufacturing——A Selective Review of Policies, Dtandards, and Research[J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 2009,10(5):151-173
[19] 冯烽. 内生视角下能源价格、技术进步对能源效率的变动效应研究——基于PVAR模型[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(4):38-47
[20] 李江,刘源浩,黄萃,等. 用文献计量研究重塑政策文本数据分析——政策文献计量的起源、迁移与方法创新[J]. 公共管理学报, 2015,12(2):138-144
[21] Huang C., Su J., Xie X., et al. A Bibliometric Study of China's Science and Technology Policies:1949-2010[J]. Scientometrics, 2015,102(2):1521-1539
[22] 黄萃,任弢,李江,等. 责任与利益:基于政策文献量化分析的中国科技创新政策府际合作关系演进研究[J]. 管理世界, 2015,(12):68-81
[23] Liao Z. The Evolution of Wind Energy Policies in China (1995-2014):An Analysis Based on Policy Instruments[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016,56:464-472
[24] 朱桂龙,刘奥林. 中韩两国技术创新政策对比研究——政策目标, 政策工具和政策执行维度[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2015,36(4):3-13
[25] 李凡,章东明,刘沛罡,等. 技术创新政策比较研究框架构建及应用——基于金砖国家政策文本的分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2016,37(3):3-12
[26] 彭纪生,仲为国,孙文祥. 政策测量、政策协同演变与经济绩效:基于创新政策的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2008,(9):25-36
[27] 张国兴,高秀林,汪应洛, 等. 我国节能减排政策协同的有效性研究:1997-2011[J]. 管理评论, 2013,27(12):3-17
[28] 章刚勇. 科技统计研究:方向与方法[J]. 统计与决策, 2016,(5):34-38
[29] 张国兴,高秀林,汪应洛,等. 中国节能减排政策的测量、协同与演变——基于1978-2013年政策数据的研究[J]. 中国人口资源与环境, 2014,24(12):62-73
[30] 张国兴,高秀林,汪应洛,等. 政策协同:节能减排政策研究的新视角[J]. 系统工程理论实践, 2014,34(3):545-559
[31] 张国兴,高秀林. 我国节能减排政策措施的有效性研究[J]. 华东经济管理, 2014,28(5):45-50
[32] Harrison A., Hyman B., Martin L., et al. When do Firms Go Green? Comparing Price Incentives with Command and Control Regulations in India[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2015
[33] 陈琦,欧阳峣,徐雪松. 我国钢铁企业低碳经济效率及其影响因素研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2015,35(7):1896-1904
[34] 李苗苗,肖洪钧,傅吉新. 财政政策、企业R&D投入与技术创新能力——基于战略性新兴产业上市公司的实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2014,26(8):135-144
[35] 刘凤朝,冯婷婷. 国家创新能力形成的系统动力学模型——以发明专利为能力表征要素[J]. 管理评论, 2011,23(5):30-38