Study on Data Resource Sharing Evolution Mechanism of Big Data Alliance from the Perspective of Symbiosis

Abstract

Abstract: Big data alliance is a service innovation carrier based on data resource sharing. Whether it can form good relationship of data resource sharing among multiple members, determines success or failure of alliance operation, and the overall system function. This paper establishes a data resource sharing evolution model of big data alliance using the extended logistic with quality parameter compatibility, and explores data resource sharing evolution mechanism. The results show that: big data alliance is a service ecosystem, in which core enterprise symbiotic units and non-core enterprise symbiotic units execute service innovation activities in the symbiosis environment. The evolutionary result of data resource sharing among members depends on the symbiosis coefficient. Reciprocal symbiotic pattern is the best evolution direction of data resource sharing in big data alliance.

Key words: big data alliance, data resource sharing, evolution mechanism, symbiosis pattern

Hu Yanling, Zhai Lili, Gao Changyuan, Zhang Shuchen. Study on Data Resource Sharing Evolution Mechanism of Big Data Alliance from the Perspective of Symbiosis[J]. Management Review, 2021, 33(5): 270-280.

References

[1] Drosou M., Jagadish H. V., Pitoura E., et al. Diversity in Big Data:A Review[J]. Big Data, 2017,5(2):73-84
[2] Manyika J., Chui M., Brown B., et al. Big Data:The Next Frontier for Innovation, Competition, and Productivity[R]. McKinsey Global Institute, 2011
[3] 翟丽丽,沃强,张树臣. 大数据联盟动态网络结构演化模型研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2017,36(6):78-85
[4] 雷瑞鹏,邱仁宗. 数据共享是道德律令[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2018,34(1):45-50
[5] 刘润达,林海清,赵燕平. 基于元数据分析的地学共享数据资源现状研究[J]. 科研管理, 2013,34(5):80-85
[6] Kvalheim V., Kvamme T. Policies for Sharing Research Data in Social Sciences and Humanities:A Survey about Research Funders' Data Policies[J]. International Federation of Organizations for Data Science, 2008,4(1):25-31
[7] 邬贺铨. 大数据的共享与开放面临三大挑战[J]. 财经界, 2017,(25):55-56
[8] Blumenthal D., Campbell E. G., Gokhale M., et al. Data Withholding in Genetics and the Other Life Sciences:Prevalences and Predictors[J]. Academic Medicine, 2006,81(2):137-145
[9] Tenopir C., Allard S., Douglass K. L., et al. Data Sharing by Scientists:Practices and Perceptions[J]. PLoS One, 2011,6(6):1-21
[10] Vogeli C., Yucel R., Bendavid E., et al. Data Withholding and the Next Generation of Scientists:Results of a National Survey[J]. Academic Medicine, 2006,81(2):128-136
[11] 董祥千,郭兵,沈艳,等. 一种高效安全的去中心化数据共享模型[J]. 计算机学报, 2018,41(20):1-17
[12] 严新成,陈越,贾洪勇,等. 支持高效密文密钥同步演化的安全数据共享方案[J]. 通信学报, 2018,39(5):123-133
[13] Wang X. A., Yang X. Y., Li C., et al. Improved Functional Proxy Re-Encryption Schemes for Secure Cloud Data Sharing[J]. Computer Science and Information Systems, 2018,15(3):585-614
[14] Paton N. W. Managing and Sharing Experimental Data:Standards, Tools and Pitfalls[J]. Biochemical Society Transactions, 2008,36(1):33-36
[15] Ribes D., Lee C. P. Sociotechnical Studies of Cyberinfrastructure and E-Research:Current Themes and Future Trajectories[J]. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2010,19(3-4):231-244
[16] Díaz L., Granell C., Gould M., et al. Managing User-Generated Information in Geospatial Cyberinfrastructures[J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2011,27(3):304-314
[17] 张丽丽. 科学数据共享治理:模式选择与情景分析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2017,43(228):54-65
[18] Rowhani-Farid A., Allen M., Barnett A. G. What Incentives Increase Data Sharing in Health and Medical Research? A Systematic Review[J]. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2017,2(4):1-10
[19] Zhu Y., Liu R., Min F., et al. Research on Earth System Scientific Data Sharing Platform Based on SOA[J]. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 2009,11(1):77-83
[20] 朱雪忠,徐先东. 浅析我国科学数据共享与知识产权保护的冲突与协调[J]. 管理学报, 2007,4(4):477-482
[21] Lazer D., Pentland A., Adamic L., et al. Computational Social Science[J]. Science, 2009,323(5915):721-723
[22] Kokshoorn B., Aarts L. H. J., Ansell R., et al. Sharing Data on DNA Transfer, Persistence, Prevalence and Recovery:Arguments for Harmonization and Standardization[J]. Forensic Science International-Genetics, 2018,37(6):260-269
[23] 孙冰,徐晓菲,姚洪涛. 基于MLP框架的创新生态系统演化研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2016,34(8):1244-1254
[24] 王发明,刘丹. 产业技术创新联盟中焦点企业合作共生伙伴选择研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2016,34(2):246-252
[25] 欧忠辉,朱祖平,夏敏,等. 创新生态系统共生演化模型及仿真研究[J]. 科研管理, 2017,38(12):49-57
[26] 郭淑芬. 基于共生的创新系统研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2011,(4):97-103
[27] 中国信息通信研究院. 大数据白皮书(2018年)[EB/OL]. www.caict.ac.cn, 2018-07-04
[28] Ehrlich P. R., Raven P. H. Butterflies and Plants——A Study in Coevolution[J]. Evolution, 1964,18(4):586-608
[29] 袁纯清. 共生理论——兼论小型经济[M]. 北京:经济科学出版社, 1998
[30] Andersen E. S. Railroadization as Schumpeter's Standard Example of Capitalist Evolution:An Evolutionary-Ecological Account[J]. Industry and Innovation, 2002,9(1-2):71-78
[31] May R. M. Simple Mathematical Models with Very Complicated Dynamics[J]. Nature, 1976,261(5560):459-467
[32] 徐学军,唐强荣,樊奇. 中国生产性服务业与制造业种群的共生——基于Logistic生长方程的实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2011,23(9):152-159
[33] 刘光富,鲁圣鹏,李雪芹. 产业共生研究综述:废弃物资源化协同处理视角[J]. 管理评论, 2014,6(5):149-160
[34] 王斌. 基于网络结构的集群知识网络共生演化模型的实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2014,26(9):128-138
[35] 聂荣,钱克明,潘德惠. 基于Logistic方程的创新技术传播模式及其稳定性分析[J]. 管理工程学报, 2006,20(1):41-45
[36] 杨青,彭金鑫. 创业风险投资产业和高技术产业共生模式研究[J]. 软科学, 2011,25(2):11-14
[37] 孙冰. 同一企业内软件产品间共生模式的模型建构与实证研究——基于质参量兼容的扩展Logistic模型[J]. 管理评论, 2017,29(5):153-164
[38] 冯锋,肖相泽,张雷勇. 产学研合作共生现象分类与网络构建研究——基于质参量兼容的扩展Logistic模型[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2013,34(2):3-11
[39] 叶斌,陈丽玉. 区域创新网络的共生演化仿真研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2015,(4):86-94
[40] 赵坤,郭东强,刘闲月. 众创式创新网络的共生演化机理研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2017,(8):74-81
[41] 谢桂生,朱绍涛. 基于Logistic模型的组织种群共生演化稳定性[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2016,42(2):315-320
[42] 谢桂生,阮平南,刘云. 基于独立性的组织种群共生演化稳定性比较研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2016,46(8):166-174
[43] 阿里云. 阿里园区生态技术联盟启动大会[EB/OL]. https://yq.aliyun.com/articles/290833?spm=a2c4e.11153940.blogrightarea278980.9.264b3188YPR5m3, 2018-07-09
[44] 胡浩,李子彪,胡宝民. 区域创新系统多创新极共生演化动力模型[J]. 管理科学学报, 2011,14(10):85-94
[45] 曹霞,邢泽宇,张路蓬. 政府规制下新能源汽车产业发展的演化博弈分析[J]. 管理评论, 2018,30(9):82-96
[46] 孟庆国,罗杭. 基于多智能体的城市群政府合作建模与仿真——嵌入并反馈于一个异构性社会网络[J]. 管理科学学报, 2017,20(3):183-207