网络群体性事件中政府公信力的演变:一个多案例的研究发现

›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (10): 258-272.

• 案例研究 • 上一篇

网络群体性事件中政府公信力的演变:一个多案例的研究发现

侯俊东¹, 肖人彬²

1. 中国地质大学(武汉)经济管理学院, 武汉 430074;
2. 华中科技大学自动化学院, 武汉 430074

收稿日期:2015-09-30 出版日期:2017-10-28 发布日期:2017-11-01
通讯作者: 肖人彬(通讯作者),华中科技大学自动化学院教授,博士生导师,博士
作者简介:侯俊东,中国地质大学(武汉)经济管理学院教授,硕士生导师,博士
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（71572185；71202050；61540032）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目（CUGW150402）；高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目（20130142110051）。

Evolution of Public Trust in Government from Online Collective Behaviors:Findings from a Multi-case Study

Hou Jundong¹, Xiao Renbin²

1. School of Economics & Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074;
2. School of Automation, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan 430074

Received:2015-09-30 Online:2017-10-28 Published:2017-11-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在虚实交互的现实背景下，网络群体性事件多发、频发，加大了政府的应对难度，进而诱致政府公信力水平的变化。然而，在网络群体性事件中，政府公信力为什么会变化、其内在的演进变化机理是什么等关键性问题还缺乏深度的研究。本文基于事件（过程）-感知（心理）-行动（公众）的整合框架，借助多案例分析方法，揭示网络群体性事件背景下政府公信力的变化机理。研究发现：触发情境、社会认知、群体结构、群体效能、响应恢复与心理能量6个主范畴对政府公信力变化存在显著影响，但作用方式和路径并不一致。基于此，结合政府公信力变化的动态过程，本研究探索性地构建了网络群体性事件中政府公信力的演变机理模型，即情境-感知-行为整合模型。这些研究结论可以为政府维持、重建和提升公信力提供有效的依据，并为引导政府创新和发展公共危机与应急管理理论体系提供理论基础和政策借鉴。

关键词: 网络群体性事件, 政府公信力, 多案例研究

Abstract:

In the current era where interpersonal interaction occurs both virtually and realistically, the increasingly frequent online collective behaviors have made it difficult for the government to react in an effective manner and as a result, the government is suffering from the evolution of public trust. A question is why the evolution occurs and what drives it. This paper aims to explore the evolution process and mechanism through a multi-case study from the comprehensive perspective of incident (process)-perception (mental)-action (participant). The finding is that six core factors play a significant role in evolution of public trust in government, including trigger context, social cognition, group structure, group efficacy, response recovery and mental energy, but they act in different ways. On this basis, we build a context-perception-action model of public trust evolution mechanism in relation to online collective behaviors. The conclusions are not only helpful for the government to maintain, restore and enhance its level of public trust, but also enlightening for governmental innovation and the establishment of a crisis management system.

Key words: online collective behavior, public trust in government, multi-case study

侯俊东, 肖人彬. 网络群体性事件中政府公信力的演变:一个多案例的研究发现[J]. , 2017, 29(10): 258-272.

Hou Jundong, Xiao Renbin. Evolution of Public Trust in Government from Online Collective Behaviors:Findings from a Multi-case Study[J]. , 2017, 29(10): 258-272.

参考文献

[1] 向良云. 非常规群体性突发事件演化机理研究[D]. 上海交通大学硕士学位论文, 2012
[2] Qiu L., Lin H., Chiu C. Y., et al. Online Collective Behaviors in China:Dimensions and Motivations[J]. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2015,15(1):44-68
[3] Sullivan J. China's Weibo:Is Faster Different?[J]. New Media & Society, 2014,16(1):24-37
[4] Tremblay N., Barrat A., Forest C., et al. Bootstrapping Under Constraint for the Assessment of Group Behavior in Human Contact Networks[J]. Physical Review E, 2013,88(5):1-15
[5] 董天策,王君玲. 网络群体性事件研究的进路、议题与视角[J]. 现代传播, 2011,15(8):23-27
[6] 杨明,孟天广,方然. 变迁社会中的社会信任:存量与变化-1990-2010[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2011,48(6):100-109
[7] 埃里克.尤斯拉纳,著, 张敦敏,译. 信任的道德基础[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社, 2006
[8] 马得勇,孙梦欣. 新媒体时代政府公信力的决定因素-透明性、回应性抑或公关技巧[J]. 公共管理学报, 2014,11(1):104-114
[9] 何子英,陈丽君,黎灿辉. 突发公共事件背景下的有效政府沟通与政府公信力:一个新的分析框架[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2014,27(4):40-47
[10] Wang M. H., Hu X. L. Agent-based Modeling and Simulation of Community Collective Efficacy[J]. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 2012,18(4):463-487
[11] 姜金贵,付棣,张鹏飞. 群体事件诱发因素及其关联关系研究——基于扎根理论与结构方程模型视角的实证分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014,22(Special issue):705-711
[12] 赵杨,时勘,王林. 基于扎根理论的微博集群行为类型研究[J]. 情报科学, 2015,33(4):29-34
[13] Zhang Y., Wu Y. How Behaviors Spread in Dynamic Social Networks[J]. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 2012,18(18):419-444
[14] Xie Y., Luo B., Xu R. B. The Learning System of Collective Behavior in Students' Social Network[J]. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 2013,39(8):2521-2530
[15] 沙勇忠,曾小芳. 基于扎根理论的环境维权类群体性事件演化过程分析——以厦门PX事件为例[J]. 兰州大学学报(社会科学版), 2013,41(4):94-101
[16] 高恩新. 集体维权行动暴力化的转型逻辑基于扎根理论的分析[J]. 社会发展研究, 2014,1(1):119-145
[17] 卢保娣. 重塑政府信任:治理群体性事件的关键举措[J]. 四川行政学院学报, 2014,16(2):28-30
[18] Yang K., Holzer M. The Performance-Trust Link:Implications for Performance Measurement[J]. Public Administration Review, 2006,66(1):114-126
[19] Christensen T., Lægreid P. Trust in Government:The Relative Importance of Service Satisfaction, Political Factors and Demography[J]. Public Performance and Management Review, 2005,28(4):487-511
[20] Jalali F., Khorasani F. The Relationship Between E-government and the Public Trust Among the Citizens in District 5, Tehran[J]. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 2012,4(23):5261-5267
[21] Belanche D., Casaló L. V., Flavián C., et al. Trust Transfer in the Continued Usage of Public E-services[J]. Information Management, 2014,51(6):627-640
[22] Wolak J., Palus C. K. The Dynamics of Public Confidence in U.S. State and Local Government[J]. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 2010,10(4):421-445
[23] Rockers P. C., Kruk M. E., Laugesen M. J. Perceptions of the Health System and Public Trust in Government in Low-and Middle-Income Countries:Evidence from the World Health Surveys[J]. Journal of health politics, policy and law, 2012,37(3):405-437
[24] Nicholls K., Picou J. S. The Impact of Hurricane Katrina on Trust in Government[J]. Social Science Quarterly, 2013,94(2):344-361
[25] Downe J., Cowell R., Chen A., et al. The Determinants of Public Trust in English Local Government:How Important is the Ethical Behaviour of Elected Councillors?[J]. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 2013,79(4):597-617
[26] 孔健. 公共事件中政府公信力的影响因素研究[D]. 重庆大学硕士学位论文, 2013
[27] 周红,艾太强. 公共危机管理状态下地方政府公信力的重塑[J]. 理论参考, 2012,14(12):44-46
[28] 叶竹馨,买忆媛. 创业团队的认知结构与创新注意力:基于TMS视角的多案例研究[J]. 管理评论, 2016,28(4):225-240
[29] Eisenhardt K. M. Building Theories from Case Study Research[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989,14(4):532-550
[30] Yin R. K. Case Study Research[M]. CA:Sage Publications, 1984
[31] 贾旭东,衡量. 基于"扎根精神"的中国本土管理理论构建范式初探[J]. 管理学报, 2016,13(3):336-346
[32] Strauss A., Corbin J. M. Basics of Qualitative Research:Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques[M]. Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications, 1990
[33] 王建明,王俊豪. 公众低碳消费模式的影响因素模型与政府管制政策-基于扎根理论的一个探索性研究[J]. 管理世界, 2011,27(4):58-68
[34] Chen J., Lu C. Social Capital in Urban China:Attitudinal and Behavioral Effects on Grassroots Self-Government[J]. Social Science Quarterly, 2007,88(2):422-442
[35] Johnson T. J., Kaye B. K. Site Effects:How Reliance on Social Media Influences Confidence in the Government and News Media[J]. Social Science Computer Review, 2015,33(2):127-144
[36] Horsburgh S., Goldfinch S., Gauld R. Is Public Trust in Government Associated with Trust in E-government?[J]. Social Science Computer Review, 2011,29(2):232-241
[37] 魏玖长,周磊,赵定涛. 基于BASS模型的危机信息扩散模式[J]. 系统工程, 2011,29(9):16-21
[38] Fishbein M., Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior:An Introduction to Theory and Research[M]. Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley, 1975
[39] Bandura A. Social Learning Theory[M]. New York:General Learning Press, 1977

网络群体性事件中政府公信力的演变:一个多案例的研究发现

Evolution of Public Trust in Government from Online Collective Behaviors:Findings from a Multi-case Study

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘思慧, 李文, 俞荣建, 梅蕾. 商业模式创新和数字赋能对数字化转型的驱动机制研究——基于TJ-QCA的案例分析[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(8): 342-352.
[2]	王砚羽, 苏欣, 谢伟. 商业模式采纳与融合：“人工智能+”赋能下的零售企业多案例研究[J]. , 2019, 31(7): 186-198.
[3]	王丹丹. 服务企业品牌忠诚的形成路径分析——对如家、浙商银行和小南国的纵向案例研究[J]. , 2018, 30(7): 292-304.
[4]	叶竹馨, 买忆媛. 创业团队的认知结构与创新注意力:基于TMS视角的多案例研究[J]. , 2016, 28(4): 225-240.