›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (7): 122-134.

• 组织行为与人力资源管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

悖论式领导、团队活力对团队创新的影响机制研究

罗瑾琏, 胡文安, 钟竞   

  1. 同济大学经济与管理学院, 上海 201804
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-10 出版日期:2017-07-28 发布日期:2017-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 胡文安,同济大学经济与管理学院博士研究生
  • 作者简介:罗瑾琏,同济大学经济与管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士;钟竞,同济大学经济与管理学院副教授,硕士生导师,博士
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(71472137;71202031;71302048);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大科技攻关项目(10JZD0045-2)。

The Mechanisms of Paradoxical Leadership and Team Viability on Team Innovation: An Integrated Model in the Chinese Context

Luo Jinlian, Hu Wen'an, Zhong Jing   

  1. School of Economics & Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804
  • Received:2016-02-10 Online:2017-07-28 Published:2017-07-15

摘要:

团队的跨越式发展离不开创新,在团队管理中,对于团队创新的研究因此备受关注。以中国情境下85个研发团队中85位团队主管和397位团队成员的配对数据为样本,基于社会学习理论、亲社会动机理论和团队过程理论,从团队过程视角构建了一个被中介的调节模型。运用多层次线性回归方法,考察了悖论式领导影响团队创新的机制路径,尤其是检验了团队活力的中介作用与团队任务互依性和团队认知灵活性的调节作用。结果发现:悖论式领导与团队创新呈显著正相关;团队活力在悖论式领导与团队创新之间起完全中介作用;悖论式领导与团队认知灵活性对团队创新具有显著交互影响;团队任务互依性对悖论式领导与团队活力和团队创新之间的正向关系均有显著强化效应,且团队活力完全中介了悖论式领导与团队任务互依性之间的交互作用对团队创新的影响。文章最后对所得结果做了讨论并对未来研究做了展望。

关键词: 悖论式领导, 团队活力, 团队任务互依性, 团队认知灵活性, 团队创新

Abstract:

Teams' leap development is inseparable from innovation, so team innovation has become a key focus of team management re-searches.Data is collected from 397 dyads of employees and their immediate supervisors in 85 Chinese teams.Based on social learning theory, prosocial motivation theory and team process theory, a mediated moderating model is constructed from the perspective of team process.We use multi-level linear regression method to investigate the effect of paradoxical leadership on team innovation, especially we examine the mediating effect of team viability and the moderating role of task interdependence and team cognitive flexibility.Results re-veal that:paradoxical leadership has a significant positive influence on team innovation;team viability fully mediates the relationship be-tween paradoxical leadership and team innovation;task interdependence significantly moderates the positive relationships between para-doxical leadership and team viability as well as team innovation such that they are stronger for team high rather than low in task interde-pendence, while team viability mediates the main effect of paradoxical leadership and the interactive effect of paradoxical leadership and task interdependence on team innovation;team cognitive flexibility moderates the positive relationship between paradoxical leadership and team innovation such that it is stronger among high team cognitive flexibility than among low ones.Finally, the theoretical and managerial implications of the findings are discussed.

Key words: paradoxical leadership, team viability, team task interdependence, team cognitive flexibility, team innovation