环境、寿命与经济发展:最优环境税研究——基于中国数据的模拟运算

›› 2016, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (10): 39-49.

环境、寿命与经济发展:最优环境税研究——基于中国数据的模拟运算

廖朴, 郑苏晋

中央财经大学中国精算研究院, 北京 100081

收稿日期:2015-07-14 出版日期:2016-10-28 发布日期:2016-10-31
作者简介:廖朴,中央财经大学中国精算研究院讲师,博士;郑苏晋,中央财经大学中国精算研究院副教授,博士。
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（15YJC790053）；教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目（14JJD790001）；北京市哲学社会科学重点项目（15ZDA47）。

Environment, Life Expectancy and Economic Development: The Optimal Environmental Tax

Liao Pu, Zheng Sujin

China Institute for Actuarial Science, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081

Received:2015-07-14 Online:2016-10-28 Published:2016-10-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

中国面临环境保护与经济发展双重压力，兼顾环境保护与经济发展的环境政策研究具有重要意义。通过在内生死亡率交叠世代模型中引入环境与寿命的关系，本文建立了考虑环境与寿命关系的内生经济增长模型，得到了环境税制度下经济动态路径，讨论了最优环境税问题。运用中国数据的数值分析展示了使稳态下社会总产出水平最大的最优环境税。本文的贡献是在环境税的研究中引入了环境与寿命的关系，并得到了使稳态下社会总产出水平最大的最优环境税。

关键词: OLG模型, 最优环境税, 经济发展, 环境, 寿命

Abstract:

China suffers double pressure from environmental protection and economic development. Environmental policies that take economic development into consideration are very important. Introducing the relationship between environment and life expectancy into the endogenous mortality two-period overlapping generation model, we build an endogenous economics model with environment and life expectancy. Solving the model, we obtain the economic growth path considering the environmental tax, with which the optimal environmental tax is further discussed. Employing the data in China, the simulations show that:there is an optimal environmental tax which maximizes the steady output. Besides, the implementation of environmental tax system will lead to economic recession in the short term. Our novelty is that we take the relationship between environment and life expectancy into consideration when studying environmental tax, and solving an optimal environmental tax which gives consideration to both environmental protection and economic development.

Key words: OLG model, optimal environmental tax, economic development, environment, life expectancy

廖朴, 郑苏晋. 环境、寿命与经济发展:最优环境税研究——基于中国数据的模拟运算[J]. , 2016, 28(10): 39-49.

Liao Pu, Zheng Sujin. Environment, Life Expectancy and Economic Development: The Optimal Environmental Tax[J]. , 2016, 28(10): 39-49.

参考文献

[1] 陈诗一.边际减排成本与中国环境税改革[J]. 中国社会科学, 2011,(3):85-100
[2] 刘凤良,吕志华.经济增长框架下的最优环境税及其配套政策研究——基于中国数据的模拟运算[J]. 管理世界, 2009,(6):40-51
[3] 吴健,毛钮娇,王晓霞.中国环境税收的规模与结构及其国际比较[J]. 管理世界, 2013,(4):168-169
[4] Pigou A. C. The Economics of Welfare[M]. London:Macmillan, 1932
[5] Fraser I., Waschik R. The Double Dividend Hypothesis in a CGE Model:Specific Factors and the Carbon Base[J]. Energy Economics, 2013,39(3):283-295
[6] Orlov A., Grethe H., McDonald S. Carbon Taxation in Russia:Prospects for a Double Dividend and Improved Energy Efficiency[J]. Energy Economics, 2013,37(1):128-140
[7] Bor Y. J., Huang Y. Energy Taxation and the Double Dividend Effect in Taiwan's Energy Conservation Policy——An Empirical Study Using a Computable General Equilibrium Model[J]. Energy Policy, 2010,38(5):2086-2100
[8] Lans Bovenberg A., de Mooij R. A. Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation[J]. American Economic Review, 1994,84(4):1085-1089
[9] Lans Bovenberg A., Goulder L. H. Optimal Environmental Taxation in the Presence of Other Taxes:General-Equilibrium Analyses[J]. American Economic Review, 1996,86(4):985-1000
[10] Goulder L. H., Parry I. W. H., Williams Ⅲ R. C., et al. The Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Instruments for Environmental Protection in a Second-Best Setting[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 1999,72(3):329-360
[11] Cremer H., Gahvari F. Second-Best Taxation of Emissions and Polluting Goods[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2001,80(2):169-197
[12] Jacobs B., de Mooij R. A. Pigou Meets Mirrlees:On the Irrelevance of Tax Distortions for the Second-best Pigouvian Tax[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2015,71(1):90-108
[13] Lans Bovenberg A., de Mooij R. A. Environmental Tax Reform and Endogenous Growth[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 1997,63(2):207-237
[14] Fullerton D., Kim S. R. Environmental Investment and Policy with Distortionary Taxes, and Endogenous Growth[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2008,56(2):141-154
[15] Oueslati W. Environmental Tax Reform:Short-term Versus Long-term Macroeconomic Effects[J]. Journal of Macroeconomics, 2014,40(1):190-201
[16] Williams Ⅲ R. C. Environmental Tax Interactions When Pollution Affects Health or Productivity[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2002,44(2):261-270
[17] Williams Ⅲ R. C. Health Effects and Optimal Environmental Taxes[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2003,87(2):323-335
[18] Aloi M., Tournemaine F. Growth Effects of Environmental Policy When Pollution Affects Health[J]. Economic Modeling, 2011,28(4):1683-1695
[19] 牛海鹏,朱艳春,尹训国,张平淡.治污减排对经济发展影响的最新研究进展及启示[J]. 管理评论, 2011,23(7):34-42
[20] 何建武,李善同.二氧化碳减排与区域经济发展[J]. 管理评论, 2010,22(6):9-16
[21] 杨继生,徐娟,吴相俊.经济增长与环境和社会健康成本[J]. 经济研究, 2013,(12):17-29
[22] 黄茂兴,林寿富.污染损害、环境管理与经济可持续增长——基于五部门内生经济增长模型的分析[J]. 经济研究, 2013,(12):30-41
[23] 于渤,黎永亮,迟春洁.考虑能源耗竭、污染治理的经济持续增长内生模型[J]. 管理科学学报, 2006,9(4):12-17
[24] 肖欣荣,廖朴.政府最优污染治理投入研究[J]. 世界经济, 2014,(1):106-119
[25] 徐晓亮.资源税税负提高能缩小区域和增加环境福利吗?——以煤炭资源税改革为例[J]. 管理评论, 2014,26(7):29-36
[26] Chen Y., Ebenstein A., Greenstone M., et al. Evidence on the Impact of Sustained Exposure to Air Pollution on Life Expectancy from China's Huai River Policy[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013,110(32):12936-12941
[27] Chakraborty S. Endogenous Lifetime and Economic Growth[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 2004,116(1):119-137
[28] 贺大兴,姚洋.平等与中性政府:对中国三十年经济增长的一个解释[J]. 世界经济文汇, 2009,(1):103-117
[29] 贺大兴,姚洋.社会平等、中性政府与中国经济增长[J]. 经济研究, 2011,(1):4-17
[30] Li B., Liao P., Xu J. An OLG Model for Optimal Investment and Insurance Decisions[J]. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2015,82(1):149-172
[31] Kehoe J., Perri F. International Business Cycles with Endogenous Incomplete Markets[J]. Econometrica, 2002,70(3):907-928