公司视角下基于动态面板的中国股市收益与波动关系研究

›› 2016, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 3-11.

• 经济与金融管理 • 下一篇

公司视角下基于动态面板的中国股市收益与波动关系研究

王春峰^1,2, 黄凝^1,2, 房振明²

1. 天津大学管理与经济学部, 天津 300072;
2. 天津大学金融工程研究中心, 天津 300072

收稿日期:2014-03-19 出版日期:2016-04-28 发布日期:2016-05-16
作者简介:王春峰,天津大学管理与经济学部教授,博士生导师,博士;黄凝,天津大学管理与经济学部博士研究生;房振明,天津大学金融工程研究中心副教授,博士。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(71271146)。

Research on Return-Volatility Relationship Based on Dynamic Panels from the Perspective of Firm Level in China's Stock Market

Wang Chunfeng^1,2, Huang Ning^1,2, Fang Zhenming²

1. College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072;
2. Financial Engineering Research Centre, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072

Received:2014-03-19 Online:2016-04-28 Published:2016-05-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文采用中证800样本股的面板数据,建立动态面板VAR模型,以公司视角探究股市收益与波动的关系,深入挖掘杠杆效应和波动反馈效应中的市场因素和公司因素。研究结果表明我国市场同时存在杠杆效应和波动反馈效应,且杠杆效应更具主导地位。杠杆效应中,市场因素对股票波动产生正效应,表现出反向杠杆效应。公司因素产生负的影响效应,且短时间内体现不出来。波动反馈效应中,市场因素和公司因素都对股票收益产生负效应,且市场因素比公司因素影响更大。大公司,偿债能力强、盈利能力好的公司信息披露程度高,公司因素产生的非对称特征不显著,它们的非对称效应主要受市场因素影响。研究为股市投资和监管提供必要参考与合理建议。

关键词: 公司视角, 动态面板, 收益, 杠杆效应, 波动反馈效应

Abstract:

Using the sample stocks of the CSI 800 panel data in Chinese stock market, we establish a dynamic panel vector autoregressive model to explore the relationship between return and volatility from the perspective of firm level and examine both of the market and firm factors in "leverage" and volatility feedback effects. The results show that "leverage" and volatility feedback effects both exist in China's stock market and the leverage effect is more dominant. Market factor in leverage effect produces positive effect, showing the reverse leverage while firm factor is significant and negative, but not dominant in a short time. As for volatility feedback effect, market and firm factors are both negative and the market factor is stronger than the firm factor. We also find that large firms with good solvency and high profitability have a high degree of information disclosure. Their asymmetric effects are mainly affected by market factor, while the firm factor is not that remarkable. This research can provide necessary references and reasonable proposals for the investment and regulation.

Key words: firm level perspective, dynamic panel, return, leverage effect, volatility feedback effect

王春峰, 黄凝, 房振明. 公司视角下基于动态面板的中国股市收益与波动关系研究[J]. , 2016, 28(4): 3-11.

Wang Chunfeng, Huang Ning, Fang Zhenming. Research on Return-Volatility Relationship Based on Dynamic Panels from the Perspective of Firm Level in China's Stock Market[J]. , 2016, 28(4): 3-11.

参考文献

[1] Black F. Studies of Stock Market Volatility Changes[C]. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, 1976
[2] Campbell J. Y., Hentschel L. No News Is Good News:An Asymmetric Model of Changing Volatility in Stock Returns[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1992,31(3):281-318
[3] Kanniainen J., Piche R. Stock Price Dynamics and Option Valuations under Volatility Feedback Effect[J]. Physica A:Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2013,392(4):722-740
[4] Inkaya A., Okur Y. Y. Analysis of Volatility Feedback and Leverage Effects on the ISE30 Index Using High Frequency Data[J]. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2014,259(15):377-384
[5] Bandi F. M., Reno R. Time-varying Leverage Effects[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2012,169(1):94-113
[6] Long L., Tsui A. K., Zhang Z. Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Leverage Effect in Stock Returns:Evidence from the Chinese Stock Market[J]. Economic Modelling, 2014,37:89-102
[7] Duffee G. R. Stock Returns and Volatility a Firm-Level Analysis[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1995,37(3):399-420
[8] Bekaert G., Wu G. Asymmetric Volatility and Risk in Equity Markets[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2000,13(1):1-42
[9] 赵华.中国股市的跳跃性与杠杆效应——基于已实现极差方差的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2012,35(11):179-192
[10] 吴鑫育,周海林,汪寿阳,马超群.基于EIS的杠杆随机波动率模型的极大似然估计[J]. 管理科学学报, 2013,16(1):74-86
[11] Smith L. V., Yamagata T. Firm Level Return——Volatility Analysis Using Dynamic Panels[J]. Journal of Empirical Finance, 2011,18(5):847-867
[12] Bollerslev T., Litvinova J., Tauchen G. Leverage and Volatility Feedback Effects in High-Frequency Data[J]. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2006,4(3):353-384
[13] 杨科,林洪.中国股市波动率与收益率的因果关系研究[J]. 统计与决策, 2010,26(21):123-127
[14] Dennis P., Mayhew S., Stivers C. Stock Returns, Implied Volatility Innovations, and the Asymmetric Volatility Phenomenon[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2006,41(2):381-406
[15] 陈永伟.股市波动的杠杆效应检验:一种新的方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012,20(5):31-37
[16] Brandt M. W., Kang Q. On the Relationship between the Conditional Mean and Volatility of Stock Returns:A Latent VAR Approach[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2004,72(2):217-257
[17] Merton R. C. On Estimating the Expected Return on the Market:An Exploratory Investigation[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1980,8(4):323-361
[18] Hatemi-J. A., Irandoust M. The Dynamic Interaction between Volatility and Returns in the US Stock Market Using Leveraged Bootstrap Simulations[J]. Research in International Business and Finance, 2011,25(3):329-334
[19] Ang A., Chen J., Xing Y. Downside Risk[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2006,19(4):1191-1239
[20] Li Q., Yang J., Hsiao C., et al. The Relationship between Stock Returns and Volatility in International Stock Markets[J]. Journal of Empirical Finance, 2005,12(5):650-665
[21] Koulakiotis A., Papasyriopoulos N., Molyneux P. More Evidence on the Relationship between Stock Price Returns and Volatility:A Note[J]. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 2006,(1):21-28
[22] Cheung Y. W., Ng L. K. Stock Price Dynamics and Firm Size:An Empirical Investigation[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1992,47(5):1985-1997
[23] 王宜峰,王燕鸣.投资者情绪在资产定价中的作用研究[J]. 管理评论, 2014,26(6):42-47

公司视角下基于动态面板的中国股市收益与波动关系研究

Research on Return-Volatility Relationship Based on Dynamic Panels from the Perspective of Firm Level in China's Stock Market

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李旭阁, 邱若臻, 孙月. 竞争环境下考虑平台差异度的供应链决策研究[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(10): 283-297.
[2]	丁月华, 刘维奇. 有限关注、内生性学习与期望收益[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(6): 41-52.
[3]	王梦迪, 冷奥琳, 郭菊娥. 审计质量对企业担保掏空行为抑制效应研究[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(5): 235-251.
[4]	周孝华, 张飞, 陈鹏程. 媒体信息对IPO询价机构的影响研究——基于机构私人信息视角的理论与实证[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(2): 3-17.
[5]	苏日娜, 程新生, 杨晓萍, 黄立新. CEO激励、风险偏好与企业创新[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(11): 65-74.
[6]	李涓, 李林涛. 面向劳动时间偏好差异的满意度分析与雇佣方案设计研究[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(10): 191-200.
[7]	王文隆, 王福乐, 张涑贤. 考虑低碳努力的双渠道供应链协调契约研究[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(4): 315-326.
[8]	李飞, 陆凤彬. 组织管理模式变革的影响与传导路径分析：以金风科技为例[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(4): 339-352.
[9]	樊晓倩, 苑莹. 投资者本地异常关注能预测股票市场吗？[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(10): 70-80.
[10]	段天宇, 张希, 胡毅. R&D强度与中国医药制造业上市公司绩效的门限效应研究[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(9): 142-152.
[11]	窦超, 陈晓, 李馨子. 政府背景客户、市场认知与投资机会——基于供应链整合视角[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(8): 13-28.
[12]	金秀, 姜尚伟, 苑莹. 考虑信息强度的因子定价模型及其实证研究[J]. , 2020, 32(5): 14-25.
[13]	宋慧琳, 彭迪云, 黄欣. 证券公司的研究报告与股票短期异常收益之间关系的实证研究——来自中国A股市场的经验证据[J]. , 2020, 32(5): 53-64.
[14]	匡海波, 杜浩, 张欣, 孟斌. 供应链金融模式下中小企业贷款定价研究[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(11): 245-259.
[15]	谭喻萦, 杨筝. 基于收益共享机制的线上供应链金融最优均衡策略研究[J]. , 2019, 31(9): 241-254.