管理评论 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (7): 119-130.

• 创新与创业管理 • 上一篇    

科技型企业跨界创新风险的识别及组态影响研究

林艳, 周洁   

  1. 天津理工大学管理学院, 天津 300384
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-05 发布日期:2026-07-29
  • 作者简介:林艳(通讯作者),天津理工大学管理学院教授,硕士生导师,博士;周洁,天津理工大学管理学院硕士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目(25BGL168)。

Research on the Identification and Configuration Impact of Cross-border Innovation Risks of Science and Technology-based Enterprise

Lin Yan, Zhou Jie   

  1. School of Management, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384
  • Received:2023-12-05 Published:2026-07-29

摘要: 跨界创新是科技型企业在VUCA环境下寻求可持续发展的必然战略选择,但在复杂、动态的跨界创新过程中存在诸多风险隐患,哪些风险及其组合作用会影响科技型企业的跨界创新效果,目前尚未明晰。基于组态理论,以曾出现过跨界创新效果不佳的11家科技型企业为研究对象,应用Two-step fsQCA方法展开跨界创新风险研究。研究发现:①科技型企业跨界创新效果不佳并非单一风险所致,而是多重风险并发所引起的结果。②影响科技型企业跨界创新效果不佳的风险因素包括环境风险、技术风险、管理风险、关系风险四种,其中,环境风险为远程条件,其余为近端条件,市场环境风险是导致结果的必要远程条件。③识别出并发型、技术缺失型、人员干扰型三条风险路径,且以并发型风险路径为主。研究结论填补了组态理论在科技型企业跨界创新风险研究领域的空缺,拓展了Two-step fsQCA的应用范围,并对科技型企业分类识别跨界创新风险以及风险路径,进而实施差异化的风险管控策略提供了切实的理论参考。

关键词: 两步模糊集定性比较分析, 科技型企业, 跨界创新风险, 组态效应

Abstract: Cross-border innovation is an inevitable strategic choice for technology-based enterprises to seek sustainable development in the VUCA environment. However, there are many risks and hidden dangers in the complex and dynamic process of cross-border innovation. Which risks and their combined effects will affect the cross-border innovation effect of technology-based enterprises is still unclear at present. Based on the configuration theory, this paper takes 11 technology-based enterprises that have had poor cross-border innovation effects as the research objects and conducts a study on cross-border innovation risks by applying the two-step fsQCA method. The research finds that: (1) The poor cross-border innovation effect of technology-based enterprises is not caused by a single risk, but is the result of multiple concurrent risks. (2) The risk factors that affect the poor cross-border innovation effect of technology-based enterprises include four types: environmental risk, technological risk, management risk and relationship risk. Among them, environmental risk is a remote condition, while the rest are near-end conditions. Market environmental risk is a necessary remote condition that leads to the result. (3) Three risk paths, namely concurrent type, technology deficiency type and personnel interference type, are identified, with the concurrent risk path being the main one. The research conclusion fills the gap of configuration theory in the field of cross-border innovation risk research of technology-based enterprises, expands the application scope of two-step fsQCA, and provides practical theoretical references for technology-based enterprises to classify and identify cross-border innovation risks and risk paths, and then implement differentiated risk management and control strategies.

Key words: two-step fsQCA, technology-based enterprise, cross-border innovation risks, configuration effect