管理评论 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 186-196.

• 组织行为与人力资源管理 • 上一篇    

地位威胁对员工跨界行为的“双刃剑”效应研究

贾建锋1,2,3, 孙柏鹏1, 李嘉华1, 刘伟鹏1   

  1. 1. 东北大学工商管理学院, 沈阳 110169;
    2. 工业智能与系统优化国家级前沿科学中心, 沈阳 110819;
    3. 智能工业数据解析与优化教育部重点实验室, 沈阳 110819
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-23 发布日期:2026-03-13
  • 作者简介:贾建锋(通讯作者),东北大学工商管理学院、工业智能与系统优化国家级前沿科学中心、智能工业数据解析与优化教育部重点实验室教授,博士生导师,博士;孙柏鹏,东北大学工商管理学院博士研究生;李嘉华,东北大学工商管理学院硕士研究生;刘伟鹏,东北大学工商管理学院博士后。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(71972032;72172032)。

The “Double-edged Sword” Effects of Status Threats on Employee Boundary-spanning Behavior

Jia Jianfeng1,2,3, Sun Baipeng1, Li Jiahua1, Liu Weipeng1   

  1. 1. School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169;
    2. National Frontiers Science Center for Industrial Intelligence and Systems Optimization, Shenyang 110819;
    3. Key Laboratory of Data Analytics and Optimization for Smart Industry (Northeastern University), Ministry of Education, Shenyang 110819
  • Received:2024-02-23 Published:2026-03-13

摘要: 基于资源保存理论,探讨了地位威胁影响员工跨界行为的作用机制和边界条件。通过收集406名企业员工3个时点的配对数据,采用层次回归分析法和Bootstrap法进行假设检验。研究结果显示:第一,当员工核心自我评价高时,地位威胁和核心自我评价交互对证明目标导向具有正向影响;当员工核心自我评价低时,地位威胁和核心自我评价交互对回避目标导向具有正向影响。第二,证明目标导向对跨界行为具有正向影响,回避目标导向对跨界行为具有负向影响。第三,证明目标导向和回避目标导向在地位威胁与核心自我评价的交互对跨界行为的影响中起中介作用,从而表现出有中介的调节作用。研究结论深化了对地位威胁作用机制及其行为后果的理解,并为企业科学识别与有效应对员工感知的地位威胁提供了实践启示。

关键词: 地位威胁, 跨界行为, 核心自我评价, 证明目标导向, 回避目标导向

Abstract: Based on the conservation of resources theory, this study explores the mechanism by which status threats influence employees’ boundary-spanning behaviors and the boundary conditions of this effect. By collecting paired data from 406 corporate employees at three time points, hierarchical regression analysis and Bootstrap methods are used to test hypotheses. The study results show that: first, when employees have high core self-evaluations, the interaction between status threats and core self-evaluation has a positive effect on proving goal orientation; when employees have low core self-evaluations, the interaction between status threats and core self-evaluation has a positive effect on avoiding goal orientation. Second, proving goal orientation has a positive effect on boundary-spanning behaviors, and avoiding goal orientation has a negative effect on boundary-spanning behaviors. Third, proving goal orientation and avoiding goal orientation play a mediating role in the impact of the interaction between status threats and core self-evaluation on boundary-spanning behaviors, thus demonstrating a moderating effect of the mediation. The findings deepen the understanding of the mechanisms through which status threats operate and their behavioral consequences, and provide practical implications for organizations to scientifically identify and effectively respond to employees’ perceived status threats.

Key words: status threats, boundary-spanning behavior, core self-evaluation, proving goal orientation, avoiding goal orientation