管理评论 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 212-225.

• 物流与供应链管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

资金约束下考虑公平关切的农产品供应链融资策略研究

杨浩雄1, 罗明雨1, 邵恩露2   

  1. 1. 北京工商大学商学院, 北京 102488;
    2. 北京市燃气集团有限责任公司第四分公司, 北京 100176
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-04 出版日期:2025-04-28 发布日期:2025-05-06
  • 作者简介:杨浩雄,北京工商大学商学院教授,博士生导师,博士;罗明雨(通讯作者),北京工商大学商学院硕士研究生;邵恩露,北京市燃气集团有限责任公司第四分公司销售服务主管,硕士。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(23YJA630113)。

Optimal Operational and Financing Strategies for a Capital-constrained Agricultural Supply Chain under Fairness Concerns

Yang Haoxiong1, Luo Mingyu1, Shao Enlu2   

  1. 1. Business School, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 102488;
    2. The Fourth Branch of Beijing Gas Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100176
  • Received:2023-01-04 Online:2025-04-28 Published:2025-05-06

摘要: 基于乡村振兴战略发展背景下存在的农户资金约束与收益分配不合理问题,本文构建了由单个资金约束的农户和两个销售商组成的农产品供应链。研究基于Stackelberg博弈理论,建立了银行融资和交易信用融资模型,旨在分析农产品供应链在农户纵向公平关切情形和小型销售商横向公平关切情形下的最优运营决策,并通过数值分析揭示了融资利率和两种公平关切情形对供应链融资策略的影响。此外,通过模型拓展验证了所得结论在多个农户的情境中的适用性。研究发现:当交易信用融资利率与银行融资利率的差距在一定限度内时,农户更倾向于选择利率较高的交易信用融资,利率差距较大时,银行融资成为更优选择;农户的纵向公平关切行为一定程度上能够促进自身利润增加,但超过某一限度会导致供应链整体和各成员的利润均降低;销售商的横向公平关切行为对农户有利,但会导致自身与同级销售商的利润损失;农户改变融资策略的临界值会随着纵向和横向公平关切系数的增加而减小;在由单个农户组成的农产品供应链决策模型中所得的部分结论能够推广至多个农户的情况,但当多个农户同时存在公平关切时,农户的利润随着纵向公平关切程度的增加呈单调递减。

关键词: 农产品供应链, 资金约束, 纵向与横向公平关切, Stackelberg博弈, 融资策略

Abstract: Against the backdrop of rural revitalization strategy, this study focuses on issues of financial constraints on farmers and the inequitable distribution of income within agricultural supply chains. An agricultural supply chain is constructed, comprising a capital-constrained farmer and two retailers. Based on the Stackelberg game theory, we analyze the optimal operational decisions of the agricultural product supply chain under vertical fairness concern of the farmer and horizontal fairness concern of the small retailer. In line with industry practice, we explicitly examine the efficacy of two financing strategies - bank financing (BF) and trade credit financing (TCF). Additionally, numerical analysis is conducted to reveal the impact of financing interest rates and vertical and horizontal fairness concerns on the farmer’s financing strategy. Furthermore, the applicability of obtained conclusions in scenarios involving multiple farmers is validated through the model extension. The research findings indicate that when the interest rate difference between TCF and BF is within a certain range, the farmer tends to prefer the higher-interest TCF scheme. However, when the interest rate difference is substantial, the BF scheme becomes the superior choice. Secondly, the farmer’s vertical fairness concern to some extent can promote his own profit, but exceeding a certain threshold, it may lead to a decrease in the overall supply chain and individual members’ profits. Thirdly, the horizontal fairness concern of the retailer benefits the farmer but results in profit loss for the two peer retailers. What doesn’t fit our previous perception is the retailer’s horizontal fairness concern not only narrowing the profit gap between supply chain members, but also enabling the provision of higher-quality agricultural products to the market. In addition, the critical threshold for the farmer to change financing strategy decreases with an increase in both vertical and horizontal fairness concern coefficients. While some conclusions derived from the decision-making model of a single farmer in the agricultural supply chain can be extended to scenarios involving multiple farmers, the presence of fairness concerns among multiple farmers simultaneously results in a monotonic decrease in farmers’ profits with an increase in the degree of vertical fairness concern.

Key words: agricultural supply chain, capital-constrained, vertical and horizontal fairness concerns, Stackelberg game, financing strategies