管理评论 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 87-99.

• 创新与创业管理 • 上一篇    

“跌倒”后是否还会“爬起来”:不同前因组态的创新失败对企业再创新行为的影响

孙冰, 张延丰, 田胜男   

  1. 哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院, 哈尔滨 150001
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-24 发布日期:2025-01-18
  • 作者简介:孙冰,哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士;张延丰(通讯作者),哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院博士研究生;田胜男,哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院博士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(72274044;71774035);黑龙江省自然科学基金项目(LH2020G005)。

“Are You Able to Pick Yourself up from Where You Fell”: The Impact of Innovation Failure under Different Antecedent Configurations on Enterprise Re-innovation Behavior

Sun Bing, Zhang Yanfeng, Tian Shengnan   

  1. School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001
  • Received:2023-03-24 Published:2025-01-18

摘要: 创新失败会对企业再创新行为产生何种影响?已有研究尚未得出一致结论,一个重要原因在于既有研究忽视了创新失败前因的复杂性和差异性。为此,综合运用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)和倾向得分匹配(PSM)方法,以沪深两市A股的981家制造业上市企业为样本,在识别创新失败产生的多重前因组态路径的基础上,系统地考察了不同前因组态的创新失败对企业再创新行为的差异性影响。研究发现:第一,5种前因组态会引发创新失败:内部主因—知识缺失型失败、内部主因—治理缺失型失败、内部主因—认知和能力缺失型失败、外部主因—动力缺失型失败、内外共因—资金和能力缺失型失败;第二,引发创新失败的5种前因组态对企业再创新行为的影响存在差异:内部主因—知识缺失型失败、内部主因—治理缺失型失败、内外共因—资金和能力缺失型失败、外部主因—动力缺失型失败会导致企业减少再创新行为;内部主因—认知和能力缺失型失败会促使企业增加再创新行为。本文的研究旨在为企业管理者有效防范创新失败风险、为政府机构激发企业再创新提供经验参考。

关键词: 前因组态, 创新失败, 企业再创新行为, fsQCA, PSM

Abstract: The existing researches have not yet reached a consistent conclusion on the relationship between innovation failure and enterprise re-innovation behavior. This paper argues that the important reason for the inconsistency is that the existing researches ignore the complexity and difference of the antecedents of innovation failure. Using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) and propensity score matching (PSM) methods, this paper systematically examines the different effects of innovation failure under different antecedent configurations on enterprise re-innovation behavior based on identifying the multiple antecedent configuration paths of innovation failure.This study finds that the antecedent configuration of innovation failure can be divided into five types: internal knowledge deficiency, internal governance deficiency, internal cognition and ability deficiency, external impetus deficiency, and internal and external troubles. In addition, there are differences in the impact of the five antecedent configurations of innovation failure on the re-innovation behavior of enterprises. Specifically, innovation failure caused by internal knowledge deficiency, internal governance deficiency, external impetus deficiency, internal and external troubles will lead enterprises to reduce re-innovation behavior; innovation failure caused by internal cognition and ability deficiency will encourage enterprises to increase their re-innovation behavior.The purpose of this paper is to provide empirical reference for enterprise managers to effectively prevent the risk of innovation failure and for government agencies to stimulate enterprise re-innovation behavior.

Key words: antecedent configuration, innovation failure, enterprise re-innovation behavior, fsQCA, PSM