管理评论 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 284-304.

• 会计与财务管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

大股东异质性、股权质押与企业并购决策——基于股权质押动机的分析

张华玉1, 余怒涛2, 赵倩芳2, 纳超洪2   

  1. 1. 厦门大学管理学院, 厦门 361005;
    2. 云南财经大学会计学院, 昆明 650221
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-03 出版日期:2023-11-28 发布日期:2023-12-27
  • 通讯作者: 余怒涛(通讯作者),云南财经大学会计学院教授,博士生导师,博士。
  • 作者简介:张华玉,厦门大学管理学院博士后;赵倩芳,云南财经大学会计学院硕士研究生;纳超洪,云南财经大学会计学院教授,博士生导师,博士。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(72262034;71862037)。

Large Shareholder Heterogeneity, Equity Pledges and Corporate M&A Decisions: An Analysis Based on Equity Pledge Motivation

Zhang Huayu1, Yu Nutao2, Zhao Qianfang2, Na Chaohong2   

  1. 1. School of Management, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005;
    2. School of Accounting, Yunnan University of Finance & Economics, Kunming 650221
  • Received:2021-12-03 Online:2023-11-28 Published:2023-12-27

摘要: 选取2008—2019年沪深A股上市公司为样本,基于质押动机分析大股东股权质押对企业并购决策的影响,结果发现:大股东支持型(非支持型)股权质押会显著抑制(提升)企业并购的概率和频次,且路径检验发现,支持型(非支持型)股权质押会显著抑制(提升)代理问题和减少(增加)掏空行为。基于多个大股东情形讨论其治理效应和机制发现,多个大股东能有效发挥治理作用,且主要通过积极发声而非退出威胁的方式。异质性分析发现,相比控股股东支持型质押,非控股大股东支持型质押对企业并购决策的抑制作用更强,但控股股东非支持型质押对企业并购决策的促进作用显著更强;单一支持型质押对企业并购决策的提升作用更显著,而共同非支持型质押对企业并购的抑制作用更强;相比追加质押,大股东主动首次质押对企业并购决策的影响更显著;相比国有企业,大股东股权质押对企业并购决策的影响效应在非国有企业中更为显著。本文从股权质押动机视角和多个大股东治理视角丰富了股权质押与企业并购决策的研究,并从动机视角为如何防范质押风险提供了参考意义。

关键词: 股权质押, 资金流向, 并购决策, 多个大股东

Abstract: This paper selects A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2008 to 2019 as samples to analyze the influence of major shareholders' equity pledge on corporate M&A decisions based on the pledge motivation. The results show that equity pledge, if supported by large shareholders, will significantly inhibit the probability and frequency of M&As, and if not supported, will do the opposite. Mechanism test shows that equity pledge, if supported, will significantly inhibit agency problems and reduce tunneling behavior, and if not supported, will do the opposite. We further find that a structure composed of multiple large shareholders can effectively play a governing role, mainly through active voice rather than exit threat. Heterogeneity analysis shows that:(1) compared with equity pledge supported by controlling shareholders, equity pledge supported by non-controlling shareholders has a stronger inhibitory effect on M&A decision-making, but equity pledge not supported by controlling shareholders has a significantly stronger promoting effect on M&A decision-making; (2) equity pledge supported unilaterally has a more significant effect in promoting M&A decision-making, while equity pledge supported by neither controlling shareholders nor non-controlling shareholders has a stronger effect in inhibiting M&A; (3) compared with additional pledge, major shareholders' first pledge on their own initiative has a more significant impact on M&A decisions; and (4) compared with state-owned enterprises, equity pledge of major shareholders has a more significant effect on M&A decision-making in non-state-owned enterprises. From the perspective of equity pledge motivation and multiple major shareholders' governance, this paper enriches the research on equity pledge and M&A decision-making, and provides reference for how to prevent the risk of pledge from the perspective of motivation.

Key words: equity pledge, capital flow, M&A decision, multiple large shareholders