二元技术标准制定绩效的驱动因素:外部网络位置与内部技术能力的权变作用

管理评论 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 79-90.

二元技术标准制定绩效的驱动因素:外部网络位置与内部技术能力的权变作用

冯科, 曾德明

湖南大学工商管理学院, 长沙 410082

收稿日期:2020-06-29 出版日期:2023-04-28 发布日期:2023-06-01
通讯作者: 冯科(通讯作者),湖南大学工商管理学院副教授,硕士生导师,博士。
作者简介:曾德明,湖南大学工商管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(72074070)；国家自然科学基金重点项目(71932005)；湖南省自然科学基金项目(2015JJ4016)

Factors Driving the Performance of Setting Dual Technical Standards: The Contingent Effect of External Network Position and Internal Technological Capabilities

Feng Ke, Zeng Deming

School of Business Administration, Hunan University, Changsha 410082

Received:2020-06-29 Online:2023-04-28 Published:2023-06-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 技术密集型产业中的企业频繁参与二元技术标准的制定。这两种标准分别是渐进型和新型技术标准。它们具有不同的战略属性，两者都深刻影响产业创新发展。采用1988—2010年中国汽车产业企业面板数据研究企业的外部协作研发网络位置与内部技术能力对渐进型和新型技术标准制定绩效的影响。基于零膨胀负二项模型的实证研究结果表明，协作研发网络接近中心性有利于提升企业制定新型技术标准的数量，而对渐进型技术标准的制定绩效没有显著作用；内部技术能力有利于推动企业成为渐进型和新型技术标准的制定者，但不利于企业增加新型技术标准的制定数量；企业在制定新型技术标准时，内部技术能力负向调节协作研发网络接近中心性。因此，协作研发网络接近中心性和内部技术能力对企业的二元技术标准制定绩效发挥权变作用。

关键词: 渐进型技术标准, 新型技术标准, 协作研发网络, 内部技术能力, 权变作用

Abstract: In technology-intensive industries firms are often involved in setting two types of technical standards, namely incremental and novel technical standards, which have different strategic attributes and both profoundly affect the development of industrial innovation. Using a panel data of 1,987 companies in the Chinese automotive industry from 1988 to 2010, this paper studies the impact of external collaborative R&D network locations and internal technological capabilities on a firm’s performance in setting incremental and novel technical standards. The empirical results based on zero-inflated negative binomial models show that a firm’s closeness centrality in the collaborative R&D network is conducive to increasing the number of novel technical standards set by the firm, but has no significant effect on its performance in setting incremental technical standards. Internal technological capabilities are helpful for a firm to become a setter of incremental and novel technical standards, but not conductive for it to setting more novel technical standards. When a firm sets novel technical standards, internal technological capabilities negatively moderate its closeness centrality in the collaborative R&D network. Therefore, closeness centrality in collaborative R&D network and internal technological capabilities have contingent effects on firms’ performance in setting the two types of technical standards.

Key words: incremental technical standards, novel technical standards, collaborative R&D network, internal technological capabilities, contingent effect

冯科, 曾德明. 二元技术标准制定绩效的驱动因素:外部网络位置与内部技术能力的权变作用[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(4): 79-90.

Feng Ke, Zeng Deming. Factors Driving the Performance of Setting Dual Technical Standards: The Contingent Effect of External Network Position and Internal Technological Capabilities[J]. Management Review, 2023, 35(4): 79-90.

参考文献

[1] Chiao B., Lerner J., Tirole J. The Rules of Standard-setting Organizations:An Empirical Analysis[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2007,38(4):905-930
[2] 刘三江,刘辉.中国标准化体制改革思路及路径[J].中国软科学, 2015,(7):6-17
[3] Blind K., Mangelsdorf A. Motives to Standardize:Empirical Evidence from Germany[J]. Technovation, 2016,48:13-24
[4] 李晓娣,张小燕,侯建.高科技企业技术标准化驱动创新绩效机理:创新生态系统网络特性视角[J].管理评论, 2020,32(5):96-108
[5] 祝鑫梅,余晓,卢宏宇.中国标准化政策演进研究:基于文本量化分析[J].科研管理, 2019,40(7):12-21
[6] 曹虹剑,贺正楚,熊勇清.模块化、产业标准与创新驱动发展--基于战略性新兴产业的研究[J].管理科学学报, 2016,19(10):16-33
[7] Leiponen A. E. Competing through Cooperation:The Organization of Standard Setting in Wireless Telecommunications[J]. Management Science, 2008,54(11):1904-1919
[8] 全国汽车标准化技术委员会秘书处.汽车行业标准化2018年工作总结及2019年标准化工作重点[J].中国汽车, 2019,(2):18-23
[9] 陶爱萍,李丽霞,洪结银.标准锁定、异质性和创新惰性[J].中国软科学, 2013,(12):170-177
[10] 谭劲松,林润辉. TD-SCDMA与电信行业标准竞争的战略选择[J].管理世界, 2006,(6):71-84
[11] Gao X. A Latecomer's Strategy to Promote a Technology Standard:The Case of Datang and TD-SCDMA[J]. Research Policy, 2014,43(3):597-607
[12] 韩连庆.技术联盟、产业链与技术标准的确立--以中国高清视频技术的发展为例[J].科学学研究, 2016,34(3):418-424
[13] Soh P. H. Network Patterns and Competitive Advantage Before the Emergence of a Dominant Design[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010,31(4):438-461
[14] 姜红,刘文韬,孙舒榆.知识整合能力、联盟管理能力与标准联盟绩效[J].科学学研究, 2019,37(9):1617-1625
[15] 戴海闻,曾德明,张运生.关系资本、双元创新与高技术产业主导设计[J].科研管理, 2020,41(2):220-229
[16] 邹思明,邹增明,曾德明.协作研发网络对企业技术标准化能力的影响--竞争-互补关系视角[J].科学学研究, 2020,38(1):97-104
[17] Srivastava M. K., Gnyawali D. R. When do Relational Resources Matter?Leveraging Portfolio Technological Resources for Breakthrough Innovation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011,54(4):797-810
[18] Yu S. H. Social Capital, Absorptive Capability, and Firm Innovation[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2013,80(7):1261-1270
[19] 高照军,张宏如.制度合法性与吸收能力影响技术标准竞争力的机制研究[J].管理评论, 2019,31(12):73-84
[20] Laursen K., Salter A. Open for Innovation:The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among UK Manufacturing Firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006,27(2):131-150
[21] Zhang J., Wu W. Leveraging Internal Resources and External Business Networks for New Product Success:A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2017,61:170-181
[22] de Vries H. J., Verhagen W. P. Impact of Changes in Regulatory Performance Standards on Innovation:A Case of Energy Performance Standards for Newly-built Houses[J]. Technovation, 2016,48:56-68
[23] Freeman L. C. Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification[J]. Social Networks, 1978,1(3):215-239
[24] Van Zandt T. Information Overload in a Network of Targeted Communication[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 2004,35(3):542-560
[25] Diestre L., Rajagopalan N. Are All 'Sharks' Dangerous?New Biotechnology Ventures and Partner Selection in R&D Alliances[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2012,33(10):1115-1134
[26] 盛建明. 5G时代的新一代智能存储技术及其标准化的突破--从华为全闪存存储获得全球标准化组织SPEC的背书说起[J].中国标准化, 2019,(9):20-25
[27] Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive Capacity:A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990,35(1):128-152
[28] Li D., Eden L., Hitt M. A., et al. Friends, Acquaintances, or Strangers?Partner Selection in R&D Alliances[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2008,51(2):315-334
[29] 工业和信息化部.国家智能制造标准体系建设指南(2018年版)[J].机械工业标准化与质量, 2018,(12):7-14
[30] Levinthal D. A., March J. G. The Myopia of Learning[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993,14(S2):95-112
[31] Wasserman S., Faust K. Social Network Analysis:Methods and Applications[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1994
[32] 张泳,王馨,侯敏,等.制度驱动要素对企业标准竞争参与意向的影响[J].科研管理, 2017,38(7):1-8
[33] Hagedoorn J. Inter-firm R&D Partnerships:An Overview of Major Trends and Patterns Since 1960[J]. Research Policy, 2002,31(4):477-492
[34] Schilling M. A., Phelps C. C. Interfirm Collaboration Networks:The Impact of Large-scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation[J]. Management Science, 2007,53(7):1113-1126
[35] Cameron A. C., Trivedi P. K. Regression Analysis of Count Data[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2013
[36] Greene W. Econometric Analysis[M]. New Jersey:Prentice Hall, 2003
[37] van den Ende J., van de Kaa G., den Uijl S., et al. The Paradox of Standard Flexibility:The Effects of Co-evolution between Standard and Interorganizational Network[J]. Organization Studies, 2012,33(5-6):705-736
[38] Tang T., Fang E., Wang F. Is Neutral Really Neutral?The Effects of Neutral User-generated Content on Product Sales[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2014,78(4):41-58
[39] Wooldridge J. M. Introductory Econometrics:A Modern Approach[M]. Toronto:Nelson Education, 2016
[40] Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., et al. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings[M]. New Jersey:Prentice-Hall, 1995