从“准入”到“扩张”:限制性市场中科技型民营企业的合法性跨越研究

管理评论 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (12): 340-352.

• 案例研究 • 上一篇

从“准入”到“扩张”:限制性市场中科技型民营企业的合法性跨越研究

丁奕文^1,2, 周阳³, 周冬梅⁴, 鲁若愚⁴

1. 成都信息工程大学管理学院, 成都 611730;
2. 电子科技大学以色列研究中心, 成都 611730;
3. 安徽财经大学财政与公共管理学院, 蚌埠 233030;
4. 电子科技大学经济与管理学院, 成都 611730

收稿日期:2021-03-01 出版日期:2022-12-28 发布日期:2023-01-16
通讯作者: 丁奕文(通讯作者),成都信息工程大学管理学院讲师,电子科技大学以色列研究中心研究人员,博士。
作者简介:周阳,安徽财经大学财政与公共管理学院讲师,博士;周冬梅,电子科技大学经济与管理学院副教授,硕士生导师,博士;鲁若愚,电子科技大学经济与管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(71602018;71732004)。

From “Access” to “Expansion”: A Multiple-case Study on the Legality of Technology-based Private Enterprises in Restricted Markets

Ding Yiwen^1,2, Zhou Yang³, Zhou Dongmei⁴, Lu Ruoyu⁴

1. School of Management, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 611730;
2. Israel Research Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611730;
3. Institute of Finance and Public Management, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233030;
4. School of Management of Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611730

Received:2021-03-01 Online:2022-12-28 Published:2023-01-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 党的十八大以来,作为国家战略的军民融合受到了高度关注和广泛实践,民参军迅速发展,虽有一些民营企业已成功进入军工市场,但绝大多数企业仍受制于体制、机制等问题从而被阻挡于军工市场的门外,学术界对于“民营企业如何获取军工市场合法性”等问题仍知之甚少。本文以合法性理论为基础,从民营企业进入限制性市场路径演化的角度入手,采用横向比较与纵向分析相结合的多案例方法探究了以上问题。研究发现:民营企业在进入军工市场时,经历了从“准入”到“扩张”的多个阶段,需要获取规范合法性、规制合法性与认知合法性;企业基于自身资源禀赋、战略目标以及合作网络的考虑,采用不同的策略方式从而获取合法性。研究结论对民营企业参军实践以及相关研究具有一定的借鉴价值。

关键词: 民营企业, 军工市场, 合法性获取, 企业创业

Abstract: Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the integration of civil industry and military industry has been highly concerned and widely practiced. With the rapid development of civilian participation in the military industry, some private enterprises have successfully entered the military industry market, but most of them are still restricted by the system and mechanism and are isolated from the military industry market. In addition, the academic community still knows little about how private enterprises could obtain their legitimacy in the military industry market. Based on the legitimacy theory, this paper analyzes the above issue from the perspective of the path evolution of private enterprises entering the military industry market, using the combination of horizontal comparison and vertical analysis. The research finds that: when entering the military industry market, private enterprises have gone through multiple stages from “access” to “expansion”, and need to obtain triple legitimacy: normative legitimacy, regulatory legitimacy and cognitive legitimacy; based on their own resource endowment, strategic objectives and cooperation network, enterprises adopt different ways to obtain legitimacy. The research conclusion is helpful to private enterprises’ practice and the relevant researches.

Key words: private enterprises, military industry market, legitimacy acquisition, enterprise entrepreneurship

丁奕文, 周阳, 周冬梅, 鲁若愚. 从“准入”到“扩张”:限制性市场中科技型民营企业的合法性跨越研究[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(12): 340-352.

Ding Yiwen, Zhou Yang, Zhou Dongmei, Lu Ruoyu. From “Access” to “Expansion”: A Multiple-case Study on the Legality of Technology-based Private Enterprises in Restricted Markets[J]. Management Review, 2022, 34(12): 340-352.

参考文献

[1] 游光荣. 对军民融合发展现状及评估的思考[J]. 中国国情国力, 2017,(1):16-18
[2] 周阳,周冬梅,丁奕文,等. 军民融合技术转移的路径演化及其驱动因素研究——"中物技术"2004-2017案例研究[J]. 管理评论, 2020,32(6):323-336
[3] 游光荣. 中国军民融合发展40年[J]. 科学学研究, 2018,36(12):2144-2147
[4] US Congress Office of Technology Assessment. Assessing the Potential for Civil Military Integration:Technologies, Processes and Practices[R]. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1994
[5] US Congress Office of Technology Assessment. Assessing the Potential for Civil-Military Integration:Selected Case Studies[R]. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1995
[6] Smit T. Civilian-Military Co-operation Strategies in Developing New Technologies[J]. Research Policy, 2003,32(6):955-970
[7] 江宣林,盛远峰. 加快军品市场信息流通推动军民融合深度发展[J]. 国防科技工业, 2015,(2):35-37
[8] Alic B., John A., Lewis M., et al. Beyond Spinoff:Military and Commercial Technologies in a Changing World[M]. Boston, Massachusetts:Harvard Business Press, 1992
[9] Mackenzie M., Donald T. Inventing Accuracy:An Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1990
[10] Reppy P., Judith K. Producing Knowledge for the Military:Experts and Amateurs in the National Security Community[M]. Trine Villumsen Berling:Security Expertise, 2015
[11] 张炜,郑晓齐. 寡头垄断军品市场博弈分析[J]. 系统工程, 2010,28(5):54-57
[12] 张允壮,曾立,黄朝峰. 军民融合制度变迁与国防市场结构转变[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2013,30(14):120-125
[13] 贺昕. 军民融合的市场机遇与挑战[J]. 软件和集成电路, 2017,(8):45-46
[14] Suchman M. Managing Legitimacy:Strategic and Institutional Approaches[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995,20(3):571-610
[15] Ashforth F., Blake E., Barrie W. The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation[J]. Organization Science, 1990, 1(2):177-194
[16] Fisher G., Kuratko D. F., Bloodgood J. M., et al. Legitimate to Whom? The Challenge of Audience Diversity and New Venture Legitimacy[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2017,32(1):52-71
[17] 马蔷,李雪灵,申佳,等. 创业企业合法化战略研究的演化路径与体系构建[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2015,37(10):46-57
[18] Zimmerman M., Gerald J. Beyond Survival:Achieving New Venture Growth by Building Legitimacy[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2002,27(3):414-431
[19] 张玉利,杜国臣. 创业的合法性悖论[J]. 中国软科学, 2007,(10):47-58
[20] 李雪灵,万妮娜. 跨国企业的合法性门槛:制度距离的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2016,(5):184-185
[21] Jones P., Klapper R., Ratten V., et al. Emerging Themes in Entrepreneurial Behaviours, Identities and Contexts[J]. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 2008,19(4):233-236
[22] Kerem G., Ozcan P. Entrepreneurship in Regulated Markets:Framing Contests and Collective Action to Introduce Pay TV in the US[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2015,58(6):1709-1739
[23] Scott M. Institutions and Organizations[M]. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage, 1995
[24] Howard E., Marlene C. Fools Rush in? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1994,19(4):645-670
[25] Martin R., Richard W. A Multidimensional Model of Organizational Legitimacy:Hospital Survival in Changing Institutional Environments[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998,43(4):877-904
[26] 李雪灵,马文杰,刘钊,等. 合法性视角下的创业导向与企业成长:基于中国新企业的实证检验[J]. 中国工业经济, 2011, (8):99-108
[27] 宋立丰,杨主恩,鹿颖. 弱合法性场域下制度创业与差异化竞争的最优区分——基于知识付费领域的多案例研究[J]. 管理评论, 2020,32(5):321-336
[28] 李新春,韩剑,李炜文. 传承还是另创领地?——家族企业二代继承的权威合法性建构[J]. 管理世界, 2015,(6):110-124
[29] Pat R., Howard E. Entrepreneurial Networks and Business Performance[J]. International Entrepreneurship, 1995,(7):124-144
[30] 韩炜,杨俊,陈逢文,等. 创业企业如何构建联结组合提升绩效?——基于"结构-资源"互动过程的案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2017,(10):130-149
[31] Fisher G., Kotha S., Amrita L. Changing with the Times:An Integrated View of Identity, Legitimacy, and New Venture Life Cycles[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2016,41(3):383-409
[32] Stevens E., Aloysius N. Legitimacy Spillovers and Political Risk:The Case of F.D.I. in the East African Community[J]. Global Strategy Journal, 2017,7(1):10-35
[33] Romeo V. External Legitimation in International New Ventures:Toward the Typology of Captivity[J]. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 2012,15(2):262-283
[34] Anna L., Srilata Z. Wall Street vs. Main Street:Firm Strategies for Defending Legitimacy and Their Impact on Different Stakeholders[J]. Organization Science, 2012,23(1):47-66
[35] Steve C., Thomas B. Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields:HIV/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004,47(5):657-679
[36] 魏江,王诗翔. 从"反应"到"前摄":万向在美国的合法性战略演化(1994~2015)[J]. 管理世界, 2017,(8):136-153
[37] Zhang W., Steven W. Overcoming the Liability of Newness:Entrepreneurial Action and the Emergence of China's Private Solar Photovoltaic Firms[J]. Research Policy, 2016,45(3):604-617
[38] 宋铁波,沈征宇. 破坏性创新与在位企业战略反应——基于合法性视角的解释模型[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2014,5(10):82-90
[39] Jawahar I., Gary L. Toward a Descriptive Stakeholder Theory:An Organizational Life Cycle Approach[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2001,26(3):397-414
[40] Eisenhardt K. M. Building Theories from Case Study Research[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989,14(4):532-550
[41] Robert K. Case Study Research:Design and Methods[J]. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2010,44(1):108-118
[42] Yin R. K. Case Study Research:Design and Methods 5ed[M]. New York:Blackwell Science Ltd, 2013
[43] Matthew B., Miles A., Michael H. 质性资料的分析:方法与实践(第二版)[M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2008
[44] 周冬梅,陈雪琳,杨俊,等. 创业研究回顾与展望[J]. 管理世界, 2020,36(1):206-225

从“准入”到“扩张”:限制性市场中科技型民营企业的合法性跨越研究

From “Access” to “Expansion”: A Multiple-case Study on the Legality of Technology-based Private Enterprises in Restricted Markets

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	邹立凯, 唐继凤, 梁强. 民营企业的员工福利实践差异——基于制度印记视角的实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(6): 217-232.
[2]	孟庆斌, 李海彤, 车玫洁, 李昕宇. 实际控制人境外居留权与公司战略选择[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(11): 253-271.
[3]	谢斌, 许治, 陈朝月, 吴辉凡. 民营企业的创新投入与创新效率——基于微观创新调查数据的实证分析[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(1): 108-120.
[4]	魏海笑, 谢恩, 毕静煜. 国有股权、专利信号与高技术行业中的民营企业债务融资[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(7): 3-16.
[5]	郑登津, 袁薇, 邓祎璐. 党组织嵌入与民营企业财务违规[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(8): 228-243,253.
[6]	何轩, 袁媛, 唐静. 企业家精神配置与民营企业吸纳就业能力的影响机制研究[J]. , 2020, 32(4): 64-76.
[7]	曾萍, 廖明情, 汪金爱. 区域多元化抑或产品多元化?制度环境约束下民营企业核心能力构建与成长战略选择[J]. , 2020, 32(1): 197-210.
[8]	吴冰, 王娟, 阎海峰. 中小民营企业国际多元化与绩效关系研究:一个倒S型曲线[J]. , 2018, 30(3): 179-187.
[9]	许玲玲. 高新技术企业认定、政治关联与民营企业技术创新[J]. , 2017, 29(9): 84-94.
[10]	朱学义, 朱亮锋. 管理会计价值增值目标的实践——以淮海控股集团民营企业为例[J]. , 2017, 29(9): 262-272.
[11]	李素利, 白延涛. 养老保障政策价值传导及其影响机制研究——基于湖北省民营企业的证据[J]. , 2017, 29(3): 207-218.
[12]	杨洁, 郭立宏. 负面报道后国企和民企间接印象管理策略比较研究——基于“双组件”模型的分析[J]. , 2017, 29(12): 127-140.
[13]	钱明, 徐光华, 沈弋, 窦笑晨. 民营企业自愿性社会责任信息披露与融资约束之动态关系研究[J]. , 2017, 29(12): 163-174.
[14]	张瑾华, 何轩, 李新春. 银行融资依赖与民营企业创新能力——基于中国企业家调查系统数据的实证研究[J]. , 2016, 28(4): 98-108.
[15]	郑文智, 许苗苗, 庄伯超. 企业为什么不实施民主参与管理:来自海峡两岸的证据[J]. , 2016, 28(3): 116-125.