强化关系还是提升自我?领导者自我牺牲影响员工主动担责的双路径机制研究

管理评论 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (12): 217-226.

• 组织行为与人力资源管理 • 上一篇下一篇

强化关系还是提升自我?领导者自我牺牲影响员工主动担责的双路径机制研究

罗文豪¹, 陈佳颖², 李育辉², 李朋波³, 郭笑笑⁴

1. 北方工业大学经济管理学院, 北京 100144;
2. 中国人民大学劳动人事学院, 北京 100872;
3. 北京第二外国语学院旅游科学学院, 北京 100024;
4. 江西财经大学工商管理学院, 南昌 330013

收稿日期:2020-06-29 出版日期:2022-12-28 发布日期:2023-01-16
通讯作者: 李育辉(通讯作者),中国人民大学劳动人事学院教授,博士生导师,博士。
作者简介:罗文豪,北方工业大学经济管理学院副教授,硕士生导师,博士;陈佳颖,中国人民大学劳动人事学院博士研究生;李朋波,北京第二外国语学院旅游科学学院副教授,硕士生导师,博士;郭笑笑,江西财经大学工商管理学院博士研究生。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(72072002);教育部人文社会科学规划项目(20YJC630093)。

Strengthening Relationship or Enhancing Yourself? The Dual-path Mechanism of How Leaders’ Self-sacrifice Influences Employees’ Taking Responsibility

Luo Wenhao¹, Chen Jiaying², Li Yuhui², Li Pengbo³, Guo Xiaoxiao⁴

1. School of Economics and Management, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144;
2. School of Labor and Human Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872;
3. School of Tourism Sciences, Beijing International Studies University, Beijing 100024;
4. School of Business Administration, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013

Received:2020-06-29 Online:2022-12-28 Published:2023-01-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究基于社会交换理论和自我概念理论,探讨领导者自我牺牲对员工主动担责行为的影响机制,并对两种机制的作用效力进行了比较。通过分析339份三时点问卷样本数据,结果表明,领导者自我牺牲对员工主动担责行为有正向影响;组织自尊在二者之间的中介作用显著,信任领导的中介作用不显著,两种机制存在显著差异。本研究结果有助于深化对领导者自我牺牲行为的作用机制和员工主动担责行为的驱动机制的认识,进一步理解社会交换理论和自我概念理论在领导者自我牺牲和员工主动担责行为之间关系上的作用差异,并推动对于领导者自我牺牲研究的理论整合。

关键词: 领导者自我牺牲, 组织自尊, 信任领导, 主动担责

Abstract: Based on the social exchange theory and self-concept theory, this study explores the mechanism of how leaders’ self-sacrifice behavior influences employees’ taking responsibility and compares the strength of two mechanisms. By analyzing a three-wave survey sample of 339 employees, the results suggest that leader’s self-sacrifice is positively related to employees’ taking responsibility. The dual-path model indicates a significant indirect effect of organizational-based self-esteem between leaders’ self-sacrifice behavior and employees’ taking responsibility, whereas the mediating role of trust in supervisor is not significant. The current research thus contributes to a deeper understanding of the influence mechanism of leader’ s self-sacrifice behavior and the driving mechanism of employees’ taking responsibility, and demonstrates the different role of social exchange theory and self-concept theory in the relationship between the leader’s self-sacrifice and the employees’ taking responsibility. Finally, this study is likely to facilitate the theoretical integration of leader self-sacrifice researches.

Key words: leader’ self-sacrifice, organizational-based self-esteem, trust in leaders, taking responsibility

罗文豪, 陈佳颖, 李育辉, 李朋波, 郭笑笑. 强化关系还是提升自我?领导者自我牺牲影响员工主动担责的双路径机制研究[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(12): 217-226.

Luo Wenhao, Chen Jiaying, Li Yuhui, Li Pengbo, Guo Xiaoxiao. Strengthening Relationship or Enhancing Yourself? The Dual-path Mechanism of How Leaders’ Self-sacrifice Influences Employees’ Taking Responsibility[J]. Management Review, 2022, 34(12): 217-226.

参考文献

[1] Choi Y., Mai-Dalton R. R. On the Leadership Function of Self-sacrifice[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 1998,9(4):475-501
[2] 杨光,周眙. 自我牺牲型领导对员工主动变革行为的影响:心理安全感和感知组织目标清晰度的作用[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2021,38(6):97-109
[3] 徐振亭,曲怡颖,罗瑾琏. 自我牺牲型领导对员工工作投入的跨层次影响研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2018,39(11):142-157
[4] De Cremer D., Mayer D. M., van Dijke M., et al. When does Self-sacrificial Leadership Motivate Prosocial Behavior? It Depends on Followers Prevention Focus[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009,94(4):887-899
[5] Choi Y., Korea S., Yoon J. Effects of Leaders' Self-sacrificial Behavior and Competency on Followers' Attribution of Charismatic Leadership among Americans and Koreans[J]. Current Research in Social Psychology, 2005,11(5):51-69
[6] 周如意,龙立荣,张军伟. 自我牺牲型领导与团队绩效:凝聚力、心理资本及心理权利的作用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2018,39(8):145-160
[7] 周如意,龙立荣. 自我牺牲型领导研究述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2017,39(11):77-89
[8] He W., Zhou R. Y., Long L. R., et al. Self-sacrificial Leadership and Followers' Affiliative and Challenging Citizenship Behaviors:A Relational Self-concept Based Study in China[J]. Management and Organization Review, 2018,14(1):105-133
[9] Morrison E. W., Phelps C. C. Taking Charge at Work:Extra Role Efforts to Initiate Workplace Change[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1999,42(4):403-419
[10] Kim T. Y., Liu Z. Q., Diefendorff J. M. Leader-Member Exchange and Job Performance:The Effects of Taking Charge and Organizational Tenure[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2015,36(2):216-231
[11] 廖辉尧,梁建. 自我牺牲型领导与员工主动行为:一个整合模型[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2015,32(23):28-37
[12] Li R., Zhang Z. Y., Tian X. M. Can Self-sacrificial Leadership Promote Subordinate Taking Charge? The Mediating Role of Organizational Identification and the Moderating Role of Risk Aversion[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2016,37(5):758-781
[13] 田晓明,李锐. 自我牺牲型领导能促进员工的前瞻行为吗?——责任感知的中介效应及其边界条件[J]. 心理学报, 2015,47(12):1472-1485
[14] 章凯,时金京. 人力资源开发的人格途径:理论基础与管理启示[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2019,36(1):152-163
[15] Pierce J. L., Gardner D. G., Cummings L. L., et al. Organization-Based Self-esteem:Construct Definition, Measurement, and Validation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1989,32(3):622-648
[16] Gecas V. The Self-concept[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 1982,8:1-33
[17] 黄亮,彭璧玉. 工作幸福感对员工创新绩效的影响机制——一个多层次被调节的中介模型[J]. 南开管理评论, 2015,18(2):15-29
[18] 张征,李锦. 员工主动变革行为:前因与后果[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2019,36(5):60-75
[19] Rousseau D. M., Sitkin S. B., Burt R. S., et al. Not so Different after All:A Cross-Discipline View of Trust[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998,23(3):393-404
[20] 胥彦,李超平. 服务型领导如何影响员工建言? 领导信任和消极归因的作用[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2018,35(12):6-17
[21] Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D. An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995,20(3):709-734
[22] 张祥润,王宗水,时勘,等. 内隐领导原型对领导有效性的影响机制——领导信任的中介效应和上下级沟通频率的调节效应[J]. 管理评论, 2017,29(5):75-86
[23] 罗文豪,陈佳颖. 谦逊领导对员工助人行为的影响机制研究[J]. 当代财经, 2020,(5):76-86
[24] Colquitt J. A., Scott B. A., LePine J. A. Trust, Trustworthiness, and Trust Propensity:A Meta-analytic Test of Their Unique Relationships with Risk Taking and Job Performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007,92(4):909-927
[25] Eisenberger R., Karagonlar G., Stinglhamber F., et al. Leader-Member Exchange and Affective Organizational Commitment:The Contribution of Supervisor's Organizational Embodiment[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010,95(6):1085-1103
[26] Ruggieri S., Abbate C. S. Leadership Style, Self-sacrifice, and Team Identification[J]. Social Behavior & Personality an International Journal, 2013,41(7):1171-1178
[27] Giessner S. R., Van Knippenberg D., Van Ginkel W., et al. Team-Oriented Leadership:The Interactive Effects of Leader Group Prototypicality, Accountability, and Team Identification[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2013,98(4):658-667
[28] Shamir B., House R. J., Arthur M. B. The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership:A Self-concept Based Theory[J]. Organization Science, 1993,4(4):577-594
[29] Sun L. Y., Pan W., Chow I. H. S. The Role of Supervisor Political Skill in Mentoring:Dual Motivational Perspectives[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2014,35(2):213-233
[30] 曹洲涛,王甜,宋一晓. 自我牺牲型领导会促进员工的亲组织非伦理行为吗?——组织认同的中介作用及其效应边界[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2019,36(6):21-32
[31] 潘孝富,秦启文,张永红,等. 组织心理所有权、基于组织的自尊对积极组织行为的影响[J]. 心理科学, 2012,35(3):718-724
[32] Cropanzano R., Anthony E. L., Daniels S. R., et al. Social Exchange Theory:A Critical Review with Theoretical Remedies[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2017,11(1):479-516
[33] Blau P. M. Exchange and Power in Social Life[M]. New York:Wiley, 1964
[34] 王震,宋萌,孙健敏. 主管支持员工能让组织受益吗?——主管组织化身的调节作用[J]. 经济管理, 2014,36(3):77-86
[35] Bauer T. N., Green S. G. Development of Leader-Member Exchange:A Longitudinal Test[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996,39(6):1538-1567
[36] 颜静,张旭,邵芳. 员工挑战型组织公民行为与主管绩效评价——主管的组织承诺的调节作用[J]. 管理评论, 2017,29(4):134-142
[37] Li N., Chiaburu D. S., Kirkman B. L., et al. Spotlight on the Followers:An Examination of Moderators of Relationships between Transformational Leadership and Subordinates' Citizenship and Taking Charge[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2013,66(1):225-260
[38] De Cremer D., Van Knippenberg D. Leader Self-sacrifice and Leadership Effectiveness:The Moderating Role of Leader Selfconfidence[J]. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 2004,95(2):140-155
[39] Nyhan R. C., Marlowe H. A. Development and Psychometric Properties of the Organizational Trust Inventory[J]. Evaluation Review, 1997,21(5):614-635
[40] 舒睿,梁建. 基于自我概念的伦理领导与员工工作结果研究[J]. 管理学报, 2015,12(7):1012-1020
[41] Fuller J. B., Marler L. E., Hester K. Bridge Building within the Province of Proactivity[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2012,33(8):1053-1070
[42] Podsakoff P. M., Mackenzie S. B., Lee J. Y., et al. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research:A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003,88(5):879-903
[43] 熊红星,张璟,叶宝娟,等. 共同方法变异的影响及其统计控制途径的模型分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012,20(5):757-769
[44] Preacher K. J., Rucker D. D., Hayes A. F. Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses:Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions[J]. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2007,42(1):185-227
[45] 章凯,时金京,罗文豪. 建言采纳如何促进员工建言:基于目标自组织视角的整合机制[J]. 心理学报, 2020,52(2):229-239
[46] 赵玉田,焦育琛,蒋俏. 自我牺牲型领导对员工工作努力的双刃剑效应:领导认同与领导虚伪的作用[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2022,39(5):43-56

强化关系还是提升自我?领导者自我牺牲影响员工主动担责的双路径机制研究

Strengthening Relationship or Enhancing Yourself? The Dual-path Mechanism of How Leaders’ Self-sacrifice Influences Employees’ Taking Responsibility

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王小健, 唐方成, 田予涵. 个别协议对员工创新绩效的影响：面向通信企业的实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(9): 220-228,265.
[2]	占小军, 卢娜, 罗文豪, 祝养浩. 自我调节理论视角下教练型领导对员工主动担责行为的作用机制研究[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(8): 193-203.
[3]	赵红丹, 吴桢, 刘微微. 攻击转移：顾客苛待如何影响员工反生产行为？[J]. , 2020, 32(5): 243-254.
[4]	孔靓, 李锡元, 章发旺. 包容型领导对员工主动性行为的影响：组织自尊与差错管理氛围的中介作用[J]. , 2020, 32(2): 232-243.
[5]	杨振芳, 陈庆文, 朱瑜, 曾柏森. 精神型领导是员工主动性行为的驱动因素吗?——一个多重中介效应模型的检验[J]. , 2016, 28(11): 191-202.
[6]	曲如杰, 王林, 尚洁, 时勘. 辱虐型领导与员工创新:员工自我概念的作用[J]. , 2015, 27(8): 90-101.
[7]	马贵梅1，2 樊耘于维娜1，2 颜静1，2. 员工-组织价值观匹配影响建言行为的机制[J]. , 2015, 27(4): 85-.