管理评论 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 103-114.

• 技术与创新管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

共时性双元领导对突破性创新的转换边界与路径

李树文1, 罗瑾琏1, 花常花2, 唐慧洁1, 郭利敏1   

  1. 1. 同济大学经济与管理学院, 上海 201804;
    2. 上海立信会计金融学院工商管理学院, 上海 201620
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-02 出版日期:2022-06-28 发布日期:2022-07-22
  • 通讯作者: 花常花(通讯作者),上海立信会计金融学院工商管理学院讲师,博士。
  • 作者简介:李树文,同济大学经济与管理学院博士研究生;罗瑾琏,同济大学经济与管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士;唐慧洁,同济大学经济与管理学院博士研究生;郭利敏,同济大学经济与管理学院博士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(71772138;72072128)。

The Path and Boundary of Simultaneous Ambidextrous Leadership's Influence on Radical Innovation

Li Shuwen1, Luo Jinlian1, Hua Changhua2, Tang Huijie1, Guo Limin1   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804;
    2. Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, Shanghai 201620
  • Received:2019-09-02 Online:2022-06-28 Published:2022-07-22

摘要: 本文建立在时空维度下双元领导的基础上,通过三项子研究探讨了空间分离情境下共时性双元领导对突破性创新的影响边界与路径。研究一运用制造业487名员工的两时点数据实证检验了共时性双元领导对突破性创新影响的边界条件;研究二运用科创企业案例访谈揭示了共时性双元领导对突破性创新的影响路径;研究三运用科创企业135名员工的横截面数据,通过QCA方法比较了多重要素对突破性创新影响的组态路径。研究结果显示,共时性双元领导对突破性创新具有显著正向影响,且外部互动中介了容错能力在二者间的调节作用;共时性双元领导通过知识层面的决策参与、知识共享及心理层面的效能感、期望贡献影响突破性创新;以决策参与、效能感、期望贡献为核心要素的参与-创新动机主导型路径是共时性双元领导影响突破性创新的最优路径。本文不仅为未来双元领导研究提供了时空分离视角,而且从边界与路径揭示了实现突破性创新的最佳条件。

关键词: 共时性双元领导, 时空分离, 容错能力, 外部互动, 突破性创新

Abstract: Based on ambidextrous leadership in time and space, this study discusses how and why ambidextrous leadership in the context of spatial separation influences radical innovation. Study 1 empirically tests the boundary of simultaneous ambidextrous leadership's influence on radical innovation by using two-time data of 487 employees in the manufacturing industry. Study 2 reveals the path of simultaneous ambidextrous leadership's influence on radical innovation through case interviews of S.&T. enterprises. Study 3 uses data of 135 employees in S.&T. enterprises to compare the configuration paths of the impact of many important factors on radical innovation by QCA method. The results show that simultaneous ambidextrous leadership has a significant positive impact on radical innovation, and external interaction mediates the moderating role of fault-tolerant ability between the two; simultaneous ambidextrous leadership influences radical innovation through decision-making participation and knowledge sharing at the knowledge level, and efficiency and expected contribution at psychological level. Motivation-oriented path of participation-innovation, with decision-making participation, efficacy and expected contribution as the core elements, is the optimal path for simultaneous ambidextrous leadership to influence radical innovation. This paper not only provides a space-time separation perspective for future researches on ambidextrous leadership, but also reveals the best conditions for radical innovation from the perspective of boundaries and paths.

Key words: simultaneous ambidextrous leadership, space-time separation, fault-tolerant ability, external interaction, radical innovation