丑闻对公共信任的传染机制：一个准实验研究

管理评论 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 310-321.

丑闻对公共信任的传染机制：一个准实验研究

徐彪¹, 张珣²

1. 南京大学政府管理学院, 南京 210023;
2. 河海大学商学院, 南京 211100

收稿日期:2018-05-09 出版日期:2021-01-28 发布日期:2021-02-03
通讯作者: 张珣(通讯作者),河海大学商学院副教授,硕士生导师,博士
作者简介:徐彪,南京大学政府管理学院教授,硕士生导师,博士。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目（71874080）；国家自然科学基金青年项目（71802070）。

The Contagion Mechanism of Public Trust by Government Scandals: A Quasi Experimental Study

Xu Biao¹, Zhang Xun²

1. School of Government, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023;
2. Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100

Received:2018-05-09 Online:2021-01-28 Published:2021-02-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文将公共信任划分为角色信任、系统信任和制度信任三个层次，运用实验的方法，考察了丑闻对不同层次公共信任的影响关系和传染机制。结果发现：（1）丑闻事件发生后，会向公共信任领域产生传染，导致角色信任、系统信任和制度信任受损。（2）角色信任在丑闻与系统信任受损的关系中扮演中介作用。（3）角色相似性越高，丑闻将导致更严重的角色信任受损、系统信任受损和制度信任受损；系统相似性越高，丑闻将导致更严重系统信任受损和制度信任受损。（4）丑闻事件的稳定性归因越强，越容易向角色信任、系统信任传染；外部性归因越强，越容易向系统信任和制度信任传染。（5）角色相似性正向调节丑闻与稳定归因的交互项对公共信任受损的负面影响。（6）在丑闻与稳定性归因的交互项对系统信任受损以及丑闻与外部归因交互项对制度信任受损的影响关系中，角色信任受损发挥了中介作用。研究结论深化了对公共信任危机形成、信任危机传导的理论认识，并对政府危机管理实践具有重要启发。

关键词: 丑闻, 公共信任, 传染机制, 信任危机

Abstract: This paper divides public trust into three levels:role trust, system trust and institution trust, and uses experimental methods to investigate the influence of scandal on different levels of public trust. The conclusions are as follows. (1) Government scandal will lead to the damage of role trust, system trust and institution trust. (2) Role trust plays a mediating role in the relationship between the government scandal and system trust. (3) The more similar role is, the more serious damage of role trust, system trust and institution trust would be caused by scandal; the more similar system is, the more serious damage of system trust and institution trust would be caused by scandal. (4) The stronger stability attribution is, the more easily scandals will damage role trust and system trust; the stronger externality attribution is, the more easily scandals will damage system trust and institutional trust. (5) Role similarity positively regulates the effect of interaction terms of stability attribution and scandal on public trust damage; (6) Role trust plays a mediating role in the relationship between interaction terms of stability attribution and scandal and system trust, and the relation between interaction terms of external attribution and scandal and the institution trust. These conclusions can promote the theoretical dialogue between public trust and public crisis, and bring inspiration to the relevant government practices.

Key words: scandal, public trust, contagion mechanism, trust crisis

徐彪, 张珣. 丑闻对公共信任的传染机制：一个准实验研究[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(1): 310-321.

Xu Biao, Zhang Xun. The Contagion Mechanism of Public Trust by Government Scandals: A Quasi Experimental Study[J]. Management Review, 2021, 33(1): 310-321.

参考文献

[1] 谢新水. 论公共信任及公共信任问题[J]. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2012, (6):54-61
[2] 王敬尧,王承禹. 农地规模经营中的信任转变[J]. 政治学研究, 2018,(1):59-69
[3] 李智超,孙中伟,方震平. 政策公平、社会网络与灾后基层政府信任度研究——基于汶川灾区三年期追踪调查数据的分析[J]. 公共管理学报, 2015,12(4):47-57
[4] 刘力锐. 无形的信任链:论政府信任失灵的传导效应[J]. 政治学研究, 2018,(1):82-94
[5] 徐彪. 公共危机事件后政府信任受损、修复机理及应对策略[J]. 公共管理学报, 2014,11(2):27-38
[6] 徐彪,陆湾湾,刘晓蓉,等. 公共危机事件后公众对政府责任感知的形成机制研究[J]. 公共行政评论, 2016,(6):144-163
[7] 李燕凌,丁莹. 网络舆情公共危机治理中社会信任修复研究——基于动物疫情危机演化博弈的实证分析[J]. 公共管理学报, 2017,14(5):91-101
[8] 徐彪. 公共危机事件后的政府信任修复[J]. 中国行政管理, 2013,(2):31-35
[9] 王雪莉,董念念. 中国式众筹的信任如何构建和演化?——基于水木客众筹行为的案例研究[J]. 管理评论, 2018,30(1):242-255
[10] 彼得·什托姆普卡(波兰). 程胜利,译. 信任——一种社会学理论[M]. 北京:中华书局, 2005
[11] Persson T. P., Parker C. F., Widmalm S. Social Trust, Impartial Administration and Public Confidence in Eu Crisis Management Institutions[J]. Public Administration, 2017,95(1):97-114
[12] 严清华,程垒,隗易. 思想史视角的公共信任研究综述[J]. 经济学动态, 2011,(12):135-140
[13] Pavlou P. A. Institution-based Trust in Inter-organizational Exchange Relationships:The Role of Online B2B Marketplaces on Trust Formation[J]. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2002,11(3):215-243
[14] 雷宇. 声誉机制的信任基础:危机与重建[J]. 管理评论, 2016,28(8):225-237
[15] Lee W. S., Guven C. Engaging in Corruption:The Influence of Cultural Values and Contagion Effects at the Microlevel[J]. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2013,39:287-300
[16] 吴元元. 信息基础、声誉机制与执法优化——食品安全治理的新视野[J]. 中国社会科学, 2012,(6):115-133
[17] Judge W., Mcnatt D. B., Xu W. C. The Antecedents and Effects of National Corruption:A Meta-analysis[J]. Journal of World Business, 2011,46(1):93-103
[18] Wang C. S. Government Performance, Corruption, and Political Trust in East Asia[J]. Social Science Quarterly, 2016,97(2):211-231
[19] Schneider P., Bose G. Organizational Cultures of Corruption[J]. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 2017,19(1):59-80
[20] 徐彪. 负面事件后政府信任危机的形成机制研究:一个准实验研究[J]. 学海, 2019,(2):113-125
[21] Werner B. An Attributional Model Motivation and Emotion[M]. New York:Springer-Verlag, 1986
[22] Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D. An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995,20(3):709-734
[23] Osherson D. N., Smith E. E., Wilkie O., et al. Category-based Induction[J]. Psychological Review, 1990,97(2):185-200
[24] 叶宝娟,温忠麟. 有中介的调节模型检验方法:甄别和整合[J]. 心理学报, 2013,45(9):1050-1060
[25] Robinson S. L. Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996,44(4):574-599
[26] 卜玉梅. 风险分配、系统信任与风险感知——对厦门市幼儿家长食品安全风险感知的实证研究[D]. 厦门大学硕士学位论文, 2009
[27] 黄静,王新刚,张司飞,等. 企业家违情与违法行为对品牌形象的影响[J]. 管理世界, 2010,(5):96-106
[28] Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. Self-Report in Organizational Research[J]. Journal of Management, 1986,12(4):531-544
[29] Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research:Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986,51(6):1173-1182
[30] Preacher K. J., Hayes A. F. Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models[J]. Behavior Research Methods, 2008,40(3):879-891
[31] 温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰. 有中介的调节变量和有调节的中介变量[J]. 心理学报, 2006,38(3):448-452