互补共融还是纵横分隔？——基于互补视角的平台组织架构设计研究

›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 307-322.

互补共融还是纵横分隔？——基于互补视角的平台组织架构设计研究

张敬博¹, 葛京¹, 杜艺姗²

1. 西安交通大学管理学院, 西安 710049;
2. 陕西科技大学经济管理学院, 西安 710021

收稿日期:2019-06-28 出版日期:2020-03-28 发布日期:2020-04-08
通讯作者: 葛京(通讯作者),西安交通大学管理学院副教授,博士生导师,博士
作者简介:张敬博,西安交通大学管理学院博士研究生;杜艺姗,陕西科技大学经济与管理学院讲师,博士
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目（71772152；71472147）。

Complementary Resources Integration or Hierarchies Separation?——Study of Platform Organization Architecture Design from Complementarity Perspective

Zhang Jingbo¹, Ge Jing¹, Du Yishan²

1. School of Management, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049;
2. School of Economics & Management, Shanxi University of Science & Technology, Xi'an 710021

Received:2019-06-28 Online:2020-03-28 Published:2020-04-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

互补性是平台组织架构设计的底层逻辑。本文采用案例研究方法，从互补性视角探索了平台型企业内部的互补性架构设计。研究发现，平台组织配置的共用资源集合间存在纵向的系统功能互补，不同共用资源集合内也存在差异化的横向互补性。基于此，本文提出了由横、纵向互补性共同糅合形成的互补性共融架构。该架构能够为平台组织中的参与者提供自组织赋能，帮助其更高效地满足用户快变的产品需求并创造价值。本文结论扩展了平台企业在系统层次架构设计的理论内涵，提出了多维度的互补性共用资源的配置策略，有助于平台企业更高效地平衡控制与自治间的两难，也深化了平台研究中的互补性理论观点。

关键词: 平台组织, 平台架构, 组织架构, 互补性

Abstract:

Complementarity is the underlying logic of platform organization architecture design. This research presents a case study that explores the architecture design of platform organization from complementarity perspective. Our research findings show that different common resource sets are combined by vertical system function complementarity. In addition, different common resource sets are constructed through different horizontal complementarities. Then we propose the synthetical architecture design of platform organization which is combined by horizontal and vertical complementarities. This synthetical complementary architecture can provide self-organizing empowerment for participants in the platform organization, and also improve their market response speed and the value creation efficiency. Our conclusion extends the system level architecture design of platform organization theory, identifies multi-dimensional complementary common resources configuration strategy, provides a solution for platform enterprises to balance the trade-off between the control and autonomy, and enriches the complementarity theory in the platform research.

Key words: platform organization, platform architecture, organization architecture, complementary

张敬博, 葛京, 杜艺姗. 互补共融还是纵横分隔？——基于互补视角的平台组织架构设计研究[J]. , 2020, 32(3): 307-322.

Zhang Jingbo, Ge Jing, Du Yishan. Complementary Resources Integration or Hierarchies Separation?——Study of Platform Organization Architecture Design from Complementarity Perspective[J]. , 2020, 32(3): 307-322.

参考文献

[1] Ciborra C. U. The Platform Organization:Recombining Strategies,Structures,and Surprises[J]. Organization Science, 1996,7(2):103-118
[2] GulatiR., Puranam P., Tushman M. Meta-Organization Design:Rethinking Design in Interorganizational and Community Contexts[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2012,33(6):571-586
[3] 简兆权,刘晓彦,李雷. 基于海尔的服务型制造企业"平台+小微企业"型组织结构案例研究[J]. 管理学报, 2017,14(11):1594-1602
[4] 胡国栋,王晓杰. 平台型企业的演化逻辑及自组织机制——基于海尔集团的案例研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2019,34(3):143-152
[5] 郝斌,冯增田. 基于镜像假设的技术与组织匹配问题研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2012,34(7):9-16
[6] 王凤彬,王骁鹏,张驰. 超模块平台组织结构与客制化创业支持——基于海尔向平台组织转型的嵌入式案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2019,(2):121-150
[7] McIntyre D. P., Srinivasan A. Networks,Platforms,and Strategy:Emerging Views and Next Steps[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2017,38(1):141-160
[8] Simpson T. W., Jiao J., Siddique Z., et al. Advances in Product Family and Product Platform Design[M]. New York:Springer, 2014
[9] Kwak K., Kim W., Park K. Complementary Multiplatforms in the Growing Innovation Ecosystem:Evidence from 3D Printing Technology[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018,136(11):192-207
[10] Su,Y. S., Zheng Z. X., Chen J. A Multi-Platform Collaboration Innovation Ecosystem:The Case of China[J]. Management Decision, 2018,56(1):125-142
[11] Mintzberg H. Structure in Fives:Designing Effective Organizations[M]. New Jersey:Prentice-HallInc, 1993
[12] Pugh D. S., Hickson D. J., Hinings C. R., et al. Dimensions of Organization Structure[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1968:13(1)65-105
[13] Gawer A. Bridging Differing Perspectives on Technological Platforms:Toward an Integrative Framework[J]. Research Policy, 2014,43(7):1239-1249
[14] Luo J., Van de Ven A. H., Jing R., et al. Transitioning from a Hierarchical Product Organization to an Open Platform Organization:A Chinese Case Study[J]. Journal of Organization Design, 2018,7(1):1-14
[15] Thomas L. D. W., Autio E., Gann D. M. Architectural Leverage:Putting Platforms in Context[J]. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 2014,28(2):198-219
[16] Winter S. G. Understanding Dynamic Capabilities[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003,24(10):991-995
[17] Sorkun M. F., Furlan A. Product and Organizational Modularity:A Contingent View of the Mirroring Hypothesis[J]. European Management Review, 2017,14(2):205-224
[18] Robertson D., Ulrich K. Planning for Product Platforms[J]. Sloan Management Review, 1998,39(4):19-31
[19] Rochet J. C., Tirole J. Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets[J]. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2003,1(4):990-1029
[20] Querbes A., Frenken K. Grounding the "Mirroring Hypothesis":Towards a General Theory of Organization Design in New Product Development[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2018,47(1):81-95
[21] Jacobides M. G., Cennamo C., Gawer A. Towards a Theory of Ecosystems[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018,39(8):2255-2276
[22] Hart O., Moore J. Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1990,98(6):1119-1158
[23] 周鹏. 互补性与超模性经济理论评述[J]. 经济学动态, 2007,36(12):82-87
[24] Baldwin C. Y., Woodard C. J. The Architecture of Platforms:A Unified View[M]. Cheltenhnam, Glos, UK:Gloucestershire Edward Elgar Publishing Inc, 2009
[25] Dougherty D., Dunne D. D. Organizing Ecologies of Complex Innovation[J]. Organization Science, 2011,22(5):1214-1223
[26] Cabigiosu A., Camuffo A. Beyond the "Mirroring" Hypothesis:Product Modularity and Interorganizational Relations in the Air Conditioning Industry[J]. Organization Science, 2012,23(3):686-703
[27] 周文辉,李兵,周依芳,等. 创业平台赋能对创业绩效的影响:基于"海尔+雷神"的案例研究[J]. 管理评论, 2018,30(12):278-286
[28] 井润田,赵宇楠,滕颖. 平台组织, 机制设计与小微创业过程——基于海尔集团组织平台化转型的案例研究[J]. 管理学(季刊), 2016,1(4):38-71
[29] Saltzer J. H., Reed D. P., Clark D. D. End-to-End Arguments in System Design[J]. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 1984,2(4):277-288
[30] Closs D. J., Speier C., Meacham N. Sustainability to Support End-to-End Value Chains:The Role of Supply Chain Management[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2011,39(1):101-116
[31] 王姝,陈劲,梁靓. 网络众包模式的协同自组织创新效应分析[J]. 科研管理, 2014,35(4):26-33
[32] 王凤彬,陈公海,李东红. 模块化组织模式的构建与运作[J]. 管理世界, 2008,(4):122-129
[33] Wareham J., Fox P. B., Cano Giner J. L. Technology Ecosystem Governance[J]. Organization Science, 2014,25(4):1195-1215
[34] Benlian A., Hilkert D., Hess T. How Open Is This Platform? The Meaning and Measurement of Platform Openness from the Complementors' Perspective[J]. Journal of Information Technology, 2015,30(3):209-228