家长式领导有助于员工利他行为吗？——基于中国情境的多重中介效应研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利他行为是中国传统文化的重要内核。基于中国情景下的管理实践，实证研究了中国企业普遍存在的家长式领导与员工利他行为之间的内在关系和影响机制，检验了感情承诺、心理授权及领导-下属交换关系的多重中介效应。运用结构方程模型对问卷数据实证分析发现：仁慈、德行、威权领导都能对员工利他行为产生显著正向影响；感情承诺、心理授权和领导-下属交换关系分别在家长式领导三个维度与员工利他行为之间起完全中介作用；除心理授权和领导-下属交换关系在仁慈领导以及威权领导与员工利他行为之间的中介效应差异不显著之外，其余中介路径的效应间均存在显著性差异。

关键词: 家长式领导, 员工利他行为, 感情承诺, 心理授权, 领导-下属交换关系

Abstract:

Altruistic behavior is an important core of Chinese traditional culture. Based on the management practice in Chinese context, this paper empirically researches the influence mechanism between the parental leadership typical of Chinese enterprises and employees' altruistic behavior, and tests the multiple mediating effects of affective commitment, psychological empowerment and leader-member exchange. An empirical analysis of the questionnaire based on structural equation model derives the following conclusions. Firstly, benevolent leadership, moral leadership and authoritarian leadership all have a significant positive impact on employees' altruistic behavior. Secondly, affective commitment, psychological empowerment and leader-member exchange play a full mediating role in the relationship between three dimensions of paternalistic leadership and employees' altruistic behavior respectively. Thirdly, there is a significant difference between any two mediating pathways in addition to the mediating effects of psychological empowerment and leader-member exchange between benevolent leadership and employees' altruistic behavior, and the mediating effects of psychological empowerment and leader-member exchange between authoritarian leadership and employees' altruistic behavior.

Key words: parental leadership, employees' altruistic behavior, affective commitment, psychological empowerment, leader-member exchange

吴士健, 孙专专, 刘新民, 周忠宝. 家长式领导有助于员工利他行为吗？——基于中国情境的多重中介效应研究[J]. , 2020, 32(2): 205-217.

Wu Shijian, Sun Zhuanzhuan, Liu Xinmin, Zhou Zhongbao. Does Parental Leadership Contribute to Employees' Altruistic Behavior?——Multiple Mediating Effects Based on Chinese Context[J]. , 2020, 32(2): 205-217.

参考文献

[1] 张三保,张志学. 管理自主权:融会中国与西方、连接宏观与微观[J]. 管理世界, 2014,(3):102-118
[2] 李垣,田龙伟. 中国情景与中国管理研究:转型特征与文化认知特征的整合观点[J]. 管理学报, 2013,10(2):168-170
[3] 黄丽,陈维政. 两种人际取向对下属工作绩效的影响——以领导-成员交换质量为中介变量[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(5):178-187
[4] 王海明. 利他主义新探[J]. 齐鲁学刊, 2004,(5):76-81
[5] 李明,凌文辁. CPM领导行为模式对员工利他行为及工作投入的作用机制[J]. 心理科学, 2012,35(6):1459-1465
[6] Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research:Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations[J]. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1986,51(6):1173-1182
[7] 魏蕾,时勘. 家长式领导与员工工作投入:心理授权的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2010,8(2):88-93
[8] 杨继平,王兴超. 德行领导与员工不道德行为、利他行为:道德推脱的中介作用[J]. 心理科学, 2015,38(3):693-699
[9] Tang C., Naumann S. E. Paternalistic Leadership, Subordinate Perceived Leader-Member Exchange and Organizational Citizenship Behavior[J]. Journal of Management & Organization, 2015,21(3):291-306
[10] 郑雅琴,贾良定,尤树洋,等. 中国管理与组织的情境化研究——基于10篇高度中国情境化研究论文的分析[J]. 管理学报, 2013,10(11):1561-1566
[11] 郑伯壎,周丽芳,樊景立. 家长式领导量表:三元模式的构建与测量[J]. 本土心理学研究, 2000,(14):3-64
[12] 曾楚宏,李青,朱仁宏. 家长式领导研究述评[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2009,31(5):38-44
[13] 郑伯壎. 校长领导作风、上下关系品质及教师角色外行为:转型式与家长式领导的效果[J]. 本土心理学研究, 2002,(6):105-161
[14] 李珲,丁刚,李新建. 基于家长式领导三元理论的领导方式对员工创新行为的影响[J]. 管理学报, 2014,11(7):1005-1013
[15] 钟定国,卢丹. 家长式领导行为对员工工作投入的影响作用——基于领导成员交换的中介作用[J]. 西安工业大学学报, 2014,34(1):57-63
[16] 武晓龙,余顺坤. 家长式领导与主动性人格对谏言行为的影响[J]. 中国劳动, 2015,(6):87-92
[17] 孙利平,凌文辁. 德行领导对员工行为的影响研究[J]. 理论探讨, 2010,(4):157-160
[18] Folger R., Cropanzano R., Goldman B. What is the Relationship between Justice and Morality?[A]. Greenberg J., Colquitt J. A. Handbook of Organizational Justice[C]. London:Psychology Press, 2005
[19] 段锦云. 家长式领导对员工建言行为的影响:心理安全感的中介机制[J]. 管理评论, 2012,24(10):109-116
[20] 许彦妮,顾琴轩,蒋琬. 德行领导对员工创造力和工作绩效的影响:基于LMX理论的实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2014,26(2):139-147
[21] Niu C. P., Wang A. C., Cheng B. S. Effectiveness of a Moral and Benevolent Leader:Probing the Interactions of the Dimensions of Paternalistic Leadership[J]. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2009,12(1):32-39
[22] 樊景立,郑伯壎. 华人组织的家长式领导:一项文化观点的分析[J]. 本土心理学研究, 2000,(13):127-180
[23] Kirkman B. L., Shapiro D. The Impact of Cultural Values on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in Self-Managing Work Teams:The Mediating Role of Employee Resistance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001,44(3):557-569
[24] Farh J. L., Hackett R. D., Liang J. Individual Level Cultural Values as Moderators of the Perceived Organizational Support-Employee Outcome Relationships in China:Comparing the Effects of Power Distance and Traditionality[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007,50(3):715-729
[25] 务凯,李永鑫,刘霞. 家长式领导与员工建言行为:领导-成员交换的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016,14(3):384-389
[26] 王振华. 家长式领导对员工创新行为的影响研究[J]. 山东社会科学, 2014,(4):151-154
[27] 任迎伟,李思羽. 国企背景下家长式领导与员工反生产行为:基于互动公平的中介效应[J]. 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016,(5):144-152
[28] 王双龙. 华人企业的家长式领导对创新行为的作用路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2015,36(7):105-112
[29] 陈璐,高昂,杨百寅,等. 家长式领导对高层管理团队成员创造力的作用机制研究[J]. 管理学报, 2013,10(6):831-838
[30] 沈毅."差序格局"的不同阐释与再定位——"义""利"混合之"人情"实践[J]. 开放时代, 2007,(4):107-117
[31] Meyer J. P., Allen N. J. Testing the Side Bet Theory of Organizational Commitment:Some Methodological Considerations[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(3):372-378
[32] Lavelle J. J., Rupp D. E., Brockner J. Taking a Multifoci Approach to the Study of Justice, Social Exchange, and Citizenship Behavior:The Target Similarity Model[J]. Journal of Management, 2007,33(6):841-866
[33] Buchanan B. Government Managers, Business Executives, and Organizational Commitment[J]. Public Administration Review, 1974,34(4):339-347
[34] 刘远,周祖城. 员工感知的企业社会责任、情感承诺与组织公民行为的关系——承诺型人力资源实践的跨层调节作用[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(10):118-127
[35] Cheng Y. Q., Stockdale M. The Psychology of Sex, Gender, and Jobs:Issues and Solutions[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2002,55(4):1020-1027
[36] Conger J. A., Kanungo R. N. The Empowerment Process:Integrating Theory and Practice[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1988,13(3):471-482
[37] Pierce J. L. Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership and Organization[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2001,26(2):298-310
[38] Dansereau F., Graen G., Haga W. J. A Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach to Leadership Within Formal Organizations:A Longitudinal Investigation of the Role Making Process[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975,13(1):46-78
[39] Harris K. J., Wheeler A. R., Kacmar K. M. Leader-Member Exchange and Empowerment:Direct and Interactive Effects on Job Satisfaction, Turnover Intentions, and Performance[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2009,20(3):371-382
[40] Rockstuhl T., Dulebohn J. H., Ang S., et al. Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and Culture:Ameta-Analysis of Correlates of LMX Across 23 Countries[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2012,97(6):1097-1130
[41] Graen G. B., Uhl-Bien M. Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership:Development of Leader-Member Exchange Theory of Leadership over 25 Years:Applying a Multi-Level Multi-Domain Perspective[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 1995,6(2):219-247
[42] Robinson S. L., Morrison E. W. The Development of Psychological Contract Breach and Violation:A Longitudinal Study[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2000,21(5):525-546
[43] 张亚军,张金隆,张千帆,等. 威权和授权领导对员工隐性知识共享的影响研究[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(9):130-139
[44] 唐玉洁,宋合义.领导成员交换关系与组织公民行为:下属需求满足程度的调节作用[J]. 经济管理, 2015,37(9):73-82
[45] Farch J. L., Earley P. C., Lin S. C. Impetus for Action:A Cultural Analysis of Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Chinese Society[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997,42(3):421-444
[46] 凌文辁,张治灿,方俐洛. 中国职工组织承诺的结构模型研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2000,3(2):76-81
[47] Spreitzer G. M. Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace:Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1995,38(5):1442-1465
[48] 彭正龙,赵红丹. 组织公民行为真的对组织有利吗——中国情境下的强制性公民行为研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2011,14(1):17-27
[49] 孙立平. "关系"、社会关系与社会结构[J]. 社会学研究, 1996,(5):22-32
[50] 林英晖,程垦. 差序式领导与员工亲组织非伦理行为:圈内人和圈外人视角[J]. 管理科学, 2017,30(3):35-50