管理评论

›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12): 264-272.

• 公共管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

国家治理的多维绩效贡献及其协调发展能力评价

吴丹   

  1. 北方工业大学经济管理学院, 北京 100144
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-03 出版日期:2019-12-28 发布日期:2019-12-24
  • 作者简介:吴丹,北方工业大学经济管理学院副教授,硕士生导师,博士后。
  • 基金资助:

    北京市社会科学青年基金项目（17GLC064）；国家自然科学青年基金项目（71603004，71702002）；北方工业大学青年拔尖人才培育计划项目（XN018035）；北方工业大学科技创新工程计划项目（18XN151）；北京市自然科学基金面上项目（9202005）。

Contribution Measurement and Coordinated Development Ability of Multidimensional Performance of National Governance in China

Wu Dan   

  1. School of Economics and Management, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144
  • Received:2017-03-03 Online:2019-12-28 Published:2019-12-24

PDF (PC)

423

摘要：

通过综合评价不同时期国家治理的差异，分析影响国家治理的主要因素，对于提升国家治理绩效、加快实现国家治理体系与治理能力现代化具有重要支撑作用。立足我国国民经济和社会发展全局，明确国家治理目标体系和现代化要素，从经济发展治理、科教发展治理、资源环境治理、民生服务治理等四个维度，构建国家治理绩效评价指标体系。并采用加权综合指数法、改进的理想解模型和协调度评价法，构建国家治理动态评价模型，在动态度量不同时期国家治理的四个维度绩效指数及其整体绩效指数基础上，确定四个维度对国家治理整体绩效指数的平均贡献度。根据不同时期四个维度治理绩效指数的动态变化趋势，评价国家治理四个维度之间的协调发展能力指数。评价结果显示：2000—2015年，国家治理绩效指数处于快速增长阶段，其中资源环境治理维度对其平均贡献度最高（35.86%），民生服务治理维度（24.36%）与科教发展治理维度（23.46%）的平均贡献度相近，经济发展治理维度的平均贡献度相对较低（16.32%），评价结果与国家发展实践相吻合，进一步验证了评价模型的有效性。2000—2015年，国家治理四个维度之间的协调发展能力指数高达0.977，其中经济发展治理、科教发展治理、资源环境治理、民生服务治理四个维度的治理能力指数分别为0.925、1、1、0.983。评价结果充分体现了在四个维度的共同治理作用下，现阶段国家治理的多维协调发展能力指数较高。

关键词: 国家治理, 维度, 治理绩效, 贡献度, 协调发展能力, 评价

Abstract:

Comprehensively evaluating the difference of national governance in different periods and analyzing main factors that influence national governance can help improve the performance of national governance and accelerate the modernization of national governance system and governance ability. The evaluation index system of national governance performance in China is given from four dimensions, i.e., economic development governance, science & technology-education development governance, resources-environment governance and living service governance, based on setting clear objective system of national governance for economic-society development. The performance of national governance and the average contribution degree of four dimensions in different period are measured, and the coordinated development ability of national governance performance from four dimensions is evaluated, with weighted composite index method, improved ideal solution model and coordinative degree evaluation method. The results show that the performance index of national governance increases quickly in 2000-2015. The average contribution degree of resources-environment governance, living service governance, science & technology-education governance and economic development governance are 35.86%, 24.36%, 23.46% and 16.32% respectively. The evaluation result is consistent with the national development practice, and the validity of the evaluation model is proven. The coordinated development ability index of national governance performance from four dimensions is 0.977, the governance ability index of economic governance, science & technology-education governance, resources-environment governance and living service governance is 0.925, 1, 1 and 0.983 respectively, a good reflection of the high coordinated development ability index of national governance under the co-governance of four dimensions.

Key words: national governance, dimension, governance performance, contribution degree, coordinative development ability, evaluation