从“英雄人物”到“优秀组织”——组织情境下基模“梯次递进”式形成过程的案例研究

›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 290-304.

• 案例研究 • 上一篇

从“英雄人物”到“优秀组织”——组织情境下基模“梯次递进”式形成过程的案例研究

苏敬勤, 刘电光

大连理工大学经济管理学院, 大连 116024

收稿日期:2018-05-17 出版日期:2019-10-28 发布日期:2019-11-05
通讯作者: 刘电光(通讯作者),大连理工大学经济管理学院博士研究生
作者简介:苏敬勤,大连理工大学经济管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目（71632004）；教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目（15JJD630004）；国家"万人计划"领军人才研究支持项目（中国式企业创新的基模与制度逻辑）；国家自然科学基金项目（71872026；71572025）。

From "Individual Heroes" to "an Outstanding Organization"——A Case Study of the Schema Formation Mechanisms of “Step Progression” under the Organizational Context

Su Jingqin, Liu Dianguang

School of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024

Received:2018-05-17 Online:2019-10-28 Published:2019-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基模是组织中稳定存续的核心认知结构，凝聚着组织共有的知识结构和一致的信念结构，对组织行为具有根本性影响。然而，关于基模形成的"泛化"和"固化"机理，已有研究仍存在理论缺口。根据基模的基础理论，本文在一手数据基础上通过案例研究发现：在关键个体驱动下，基模从"个体具有"发展到"群体共享"；在组织统一推动下，基模从"群体共享"发展到"组织共有"，从而实现了基模的逐级"泛化"；无论个体、群体还是组织基模，都依次经历了感知、学习和记忆的关键步骤，从而完成了基模的逐层"固化"；总体上，基模呈现"梯次递进"式形成过程。本文在理论上细化并完善了基模形成机理，刻画出基模"Z"形形成路径，为基模理论补强了经验证据；在实践上为企业文化建设等提供启示。

关键词: 基模, 形成机理, 梯次递进, 泛化, 固化

Abstract:

The Schema is the core cognitive structure which exists in the organization in long-term. It embodies the shared knowledge structure and consistent belief structure of the organization, and has a fundamental impact on organizational behavior. However, there are still research gaps in the existing studies on the "generalization" and "solidification" mechanisms of the Schema formation. Based on Schema theories, Organizational Learning and other related theories, through case studies, this paper finds that from "individual possess" to "group share", Schema is driven by key individuals; under the unified promotion of the organization, the Schema develops from "group share" to "organization own", thus achieving the Schema "generalization"; individuals, groups and organizations all experience 3 key steps:perception, learning and memory, which help them achieve the Schema "solidification"; overall, the Schema presents a "step progression" formation mechanisms. The research theoretically refines the Schema formation mechanisms, portrays the Schema "Z" curve formation path, extends the Schema to the organizational complex task context, reinforces empirical evidence for the Schema theory and provides inspiration for cultural development in practice.

Key words: Schema, formation mechanisms, step progression, generalization, solidification

苏敬勤, 刘电光. 从“英雄人物”到“优秀组织”——组织情境下基模“梯次递进”式形成过程的案例研究[J]. , 2019, 31(10): 290-304.

Su Jingqin, Liu Dianguang. From "Individual Heroes" to "an Outstanding Organization"——A Case Study of the Schema Formation Mechanisms of “Step Progression” under the Organizational Context[J]. , 2019, 31(10): 290-304.

参考文献

[1] Christopher B. B., Steven J. K. The Process of Schema Emergence:Assimilation, Deconstruction, Unitization and the Plurality of Analogies[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2013,56(1):14-34
[2] Rerup C., Feldman M. S. Routines as a Source of Change in Organizational Schemata:The Role of Trial-and-Error Learning[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011,54(3):577-610
[3] Cossette P., Audet M. Mapping of an Idiosyncratic Schema[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2010,29(3):325-347
[4] Gioia D. A., Poole P. P. Scripts in Organizational Behavior[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984,9(3):449-459
[5] Rumelhart D. E., Ortony A. The Representation of Knowledge in Memory[J]. Psychological Review, 1977,54(2):327-352
[6] Gary M. S., Wood R. E. Mental Models, Decision Rules, and Performance Heterogeneity[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2011,32(6):569-594
[7] Clarke I., Mackaness W. Management "Intuition":An Interpretative Account of Structure and Content of Decision Schemas Using Cognitive Maps[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2001,38(2):147-172
[8] Mohammed S., Klimoski R. J., Rentsch J. R. The Measurement of Team Mental Models:We Have No Shared Schema[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2000,3(2):123-165
[9] Mcvee M. B., Dunsmore K., Gavelek J. R. Schema Theory Revisited[J]. Review of Educational Research, 2005,75(4):531-566
[10] Schminke M., Ambrose M. L., Noel T. W. The Effect of Ethical Frameworks on Perceptions of Organizational Justice[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1997,40(5):1190-1207
[11] Dane E. Reconsidering the Trade-Off between Expertise and Flexibility:A Cognitive Entrenchment Perspective[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 2010,35(4):579-603
[12] Reeves L., Weisberg R. W. The Role of Content and Abstract Information in Analogical Transfer[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1994,115(3):381-400
[13] 曲衍立,张梅玲. 类比迁移研究综述[J]. 心理学动态, 2000,18(2):50-55
[14] Etzion D., Ferraro F. The Role of Analogy in the Institutionalization of Sustainability Reporting[J]. Organization Science, 2010, 21(5):1092-1107
[15] Dionysiou D. D., Tsoukas H. Understanding the (Re)Creation of Routines from Within:A Symbolic Interactions Perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2013,38(2):181-205
[16] 林海芬,于泽川,王涛. 初创企业组织共享基模的形成机理研究[J]. 管理科学, 2015,28(5):15-30
[17] 周晖,彭星闾. 企业生命模型初探[J]. 中国软科学, 2000,15(10):111-116
[18] 何轩,宋丽红,朱沆,等. 家族为何意欲放手?——制度环境感知、政治地位与中国家族企业主的传承意愿[J]. 管理世界, 2014,24(2):90-101
[19] Edmondson A. Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999,44(2):350-383
[20] Moorman C., Miner A. S. The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1997,34(1):91-106
[21] 林海芬,王涛. 惯例演化视角组织创新的实施机理研究——以天地华宇定日达创新为例[J]. 管理评论, 2017,29(1):250-264
[22] 奚菁,张珊珊,罗洁婷,等. 管理认知演化与传统制造企业转型升级——基于昭信集团的纵向案例研究[J]. 管理案例研究与评论, 2016,9(4):351-367
[23] 段锦云,王娟娟,朱月龙. 组织氛围研究:概念测量、理论基础及评价展望[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014,22(12):1964-1974
[24] 高建丽,张同全. "个体——组织"文化契合对敬业度的作用路径研究——以心理资本为中介变量[J]. 中国软科学, 2015,30(5):101-109
[25] 刘智强,邓传军,廖建桥,等. 组织支持、地位认知与员工创新:雇佣多样性视角[J]. 管理科学学报, 2015,18(10):80-94
[26] 金辉,杨忠,黄彦婷,等. 组织激励、组织文化对知识共享的作用机理——基于修订的社会影响理论[J]. 科学学研究, 2013,31(11):1697-1707
[27] 张勉,张德. 组织文化的影响和传播机制研究述评[J]. 科学学研究, 2003,21(S1):177-182
[28] 吕一博,韩少杰,苏敬勤. 企业组织惯性的表现架构:来源、维度与显现路径[J]. 中国工业经济, 2016,33(10):144-160
[29] Pentland B. T., Feldman M. S. Organizational Routines as a Unit of Analysis[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2005,14(5):793-815
[30] 林海芬,于泽川,王涛. 基于组织惯例的组织创新持续内生机理研究评述[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2017,29(1):127-138
[31] 郭士伊,席酉民,郎淳刚. 组织性格:个体在组织中的同质化现象[J]. 管理评论, 2008,20(1):17-25
[32] Dearmond S., Crawford E. C. Organization Personality Perceptions and Attraction:The Role of Social Identity Consciousness[J]. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2011,19(4):405-414
[33] 毛基业,苏芳. 案例研究的理论贡献——中国企业管理案例与质性研究论坛(2015)综述[J]. 管理世界, 2016,32(2):128-132
[34] Eisenhardt K. M. Building Theories From Case Study Research[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989,14(4):532-550
[35] Eisenhardt K. M., Graebner M. E. Theory Building From Cases:Opportunities and Challenges[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007,50(1):25-32
[36] Eisenhardt K. M. Better Stories and Better Constructs:The Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1991,16(3):620-627
[37] 夏泥,胡斌. 任务驱动的隐性知识学习研究[J]. 科研管理, 2016,37(5):141-149
[38] 陈劲,周子范,周永庆. 复杂产品系统创新的过程模型研究[J]. 科研管理, 2005,26(2):61-67

从“英雄人物”到“优秀组织”——组织情境下基模“梯次递进”式形成过程的案例研究

From "Individual Heroes" to "an Outstanding Organization"——A Case Study of the Schema Formation Mechanisms of “Step Progression” under the Organizational Context

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	何建笃, 孙新波, 张庆强. 数字国际创业模式形成机理的多案例研究[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(8): 327-341.
[2]	陈运平, 黄小勇, 成忠厚, 孙红月. 基于系统基模的“互联网+”驱动传统农业创新发展路径研究[J]. , 2019, 31(6): 113-122.
[3]	孙娟, 李艳军. 农户农资产品锁定购买行为形成机理的实证研究——基于山东省、湖北省和四川省的差异分析[J]. , 2018, 30(2): 146-158.
[4]	梅强, 张菁菁, 刘素霞, 仲晶晶, 王琦玮. 安全评价制度目标偏离的形成机理研究[J]. , 2017, 29(5): 216-225.
[5]	刘炳胜, 王然, 陈晓红, 孟俊娜, 薛斌. 中国建筑产业竞争力形成机理动态演进规律空间差异化研究[J]. , 2017, 29(1): 93-104.
[6]	宋晶, 孙永磊. 合作创新网络能力的形成机理研究——影响因素探索和实证分析[J]. , 2016, 28(3): 67-75.