企业能力如何“动”“静”组合提升企业绩效?——能力理论视角下的追踪研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

现有研究主要关注某种或某几种特定能力的独立影响作用，很少注意不同能力间交互作用可能带来的综合影响。基于能力组合与匹配的视角，本文阐述了企业内静态能力（即技术能力）和动态能力（即双元能力和吸收能力）的组合对企业绩效的作用机制和效应差异。以300家中国企业为样本，采用多个数据来源和动态追踪的研究设计，在探讨技术能力对企业绩效独立影响效应的基础上，分析了技术创新与吸收能力、双元能力的匹配与组合对企业绩效产生的差异化影响效应。研究结果显示：技术能力与企业绩效之间存在先下降后上升的U型关系。吸收能力、双元能力正向调节技术能力与企业绩效之间的U型关系。

关键词: 技术能力, 吸收能力, 双元能力, 企业绩效

Abstract:

Different from the extant literature that emphasize impact of one or certain types of organizational capabilities, this paper takes capability configuration and fit perspective, based on capability-based view of the firm, explores the influence of firm's capability config-uration of static capability (i.e., technological capability) and dynamic capabilities (i.e., absorptive capability and ambidextrous capability) on firm performance. Adopting 300 Chinese sample firms, taking multi-source and multi-time research design, this paper discus-ses the mechanism of technological capability on firm performance, and how they interact with absorptive capability and ambidextrous capability to affect differently firm performance. Our findings demonstrate:Technological capability has a U-shaped relationship with firm performance. Absorptive capability and ambidextrous capability positively moderate the U-shaped relationship between technological capability and firm performance. The paper also discusses the theoretical implication, research limitation and future directions.

Key words: technological capability, absorptive capability, ambidextrous capability, firm performance

王淑敏. 企业能力如何“动”“静”组合提升企业绩效?——能力理论视角下的追踪研究[J]. , 2018, 30(9): 121-131.

Wang Shumin. How a Firm's Configuration of Static and Dynamic Capabilities Contributes to Its Performance——A Longitudinal Analysis from the Perspective of Capability[J]. , 2018, 30(9): 121-131.

参考文献

[1] 王喜刚. 组织创新,技术创新能力对企业绩效的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2016,37(2):107-115
[2] 郑刚,郭艳婷,罗光雄,等. 新型技术追赶,动态能力与创新能力演化——中集罐箱案例研究[J]. 科研管理, 2016,37(3):31-41
[3] Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997,18(7):509-533
[4] 吴航. 动态能力的维度划分及对创新绩效的影响——对Teece经典定义的思考[J]. 管理评论, 2016,28(3):76-83
[5] 陈伟,杨早立,张永超. 网络结构与企业核心能力关系实证研究:基于知识共享与知识整合中介效应视角[J]. 管理评论, 2014,26(6):74-82
[6] 马文甲,高良谋. 开放度与创新绩效的关系研究——动态能力的调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 2016,37(2):47-54
[7] 林亚清,赵曙明. 基于战略柔性与技术能力影响的制度支持与企业绩效关系研究[J]. 管理学报, 2014,11(1):47-54
[8] 田丹,赵杨. 从服务创新到基础软件创新:中国软件企业技术能力成长范式研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2014,(5):129-140
[9] 欧阳桃花,崔争艳,张迪,等. 多层级双元能力的组合促进高科技企业战略转型研究——以联想移动为案例[J]. 管理评论, 2016,28(1):219-228
[10] Barney J. B. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage[J]. Journal of Management, 1991,17(1):99-120
[11] Barney J. B. Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage(2nd edition)[M]. New York:Pearson Education, 2002
[12] Amit R., Schoemarker P. J. H. Strategic Assets and Organizational Rents[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993,14(1):33-46
[13] Winter S. G. Understanding Dynamic Capabilities[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003,24(10):991-996
[14] Wang C. L., Ahmed P. K. Dynamic Capabilities:A Review and Research Agenda[J]. International Journal of Management Re-view, 2007,9(1):31-51
[15] Schreyogg G., Kliesch E. M. How Dynamic Can Organizational Capabilities Be? Towards a Dual-process Model of Capability Dy-namization[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007,28(1):15-24
[16] Helfat C., Peteraf M. The Dynamic RBV:Capability Life Cycles[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003,24(10):999-1010
[17] Cohen W. M., Leveinthal D. A. Absorptive Capacity:A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990,35(1):128-152
[18] Fernhaber S. A., Patel P. C. How Do Young Firms Manage Product Portfolio Complexity? The Role of Absorptive Capacity and Ambidexterity[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2012,33(13):1516-1539
[19] 李光泗,沈坤荣. 技术能力、技术进步路径与创新绩效研究[J]. 科研管理, 2013,34(3):1-6
[20] 杨莹,于渤,吴伟伟. 企业技术能力提升对技术学习率的动态影响[J]. 科研管理, 2011,32(8):26-33
[21] Ethiraj S. K., Kale P., Krishnan M. S. Where Do Capabilities Come from and How Do They Matter? A Study in the Software Services Industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005,26(1):25-45
[22] Leonard-Barton D. Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities:A Paradox in Managing New Product Development[J]. Strategic Man-agement Journal, 1992,13(1):111-125
[23] Lavie D. Capability Reconfiguration:An Analysis of Incumbent Responses to Technological Change[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2006,31(1):153-174
[24] March J. G. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J]. Organization Science, 1991,2(1):71-87
[25] Cao Q., Gedajlovic E., Zhang H. Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity:Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects[J]. Organization Science, 2009,20(4):781-796
[26] Jansen J. J. P., Tempelaar M. P., Van den Bosch F. A. J. Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity:The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms[J]. Organization Science, 2009,20(4):797-811
[27] 王淑敏,王涛. 积累社会资本何时能提升企业自主创新能力——一项追踪研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2017,20(5):131-143
[28] Desarbo W. S., Benedetto C. A., Song M., et al. Revisiting the Miles and Snow Strategic Framework:Uncovering Interrelation-ships Between Strategic Types, Capabilities, Environmental Uncertainty, and Firm performance[J]. Strategic Management Jour-nal, 2005,26(1):47-74
[29] Li H. Y., Atuahene-Gima K. Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China[J]. Acade-my of Management Journal, 2001,44(6):1123-1134
[30] Zhou K. Z., Wu F. Technological Capability, Strategic Flexibility, and Product Innovation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010,31(5):547-561
[31] Wilden R., Gudergan S. P. The Impact of Dynamic Capabilities on Operational Marketing and Technological Capabilities:Investi-gating the Role of Environmental Turbulence[J]. Journal of the Academy Marketing Science, 2015,43(2):181-199