不确定性双元对技术创新网络脆弱性的影响：网络惯例的中介作用

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了降低不确定性风险冲击下技术创新网络的脆弱性，分析了内外部不确定性的耦合互动关系，从双元视角探究不确定性联合与平衡对网络脆弱性的影响，以及网络惯例的内在中介机制。结合高科技行业合作网络的样本数据，通过回归分析进行实证检验。研究结果表明：不确定性联合与平衡是不确定性双元的解构维度，对技术创新网络脆弱性存在正向影响；常规惯例和柔性惯例是网络惯例的根源性划分，对技术创新网络脆弱性存在负向影响；不确定性双元对网络惯例的抑制作用存在差异，不确定性联合对常规惯例的负向影响更强，不确定性平衡对柔性惯例的负向影响更强；常规惯例和柔性惯例的中介效能存在权变差异，网络主导企业的常规惯例在不确定性联合与网络脆弱性间的中介作用更强，网络合作企业的柔性惯例在不确定性平衡与网络脆弱性间的中介作用更强。研究结论有助于揭示技术创新网络脆弱性的削减机制，对提升网络的抗风险能力具有重要意义。

关键词: 技术创新, 组织网络, 网络惯例, 不确定性双元, 网络脆弱性

Abstract:

In order to reduce the technological innovation network vulnerability, this paper analyzes the coupling interaction relationship between exogenous uncertainty and endogenous uncertainty, then puts forward the concept of ambidexterity of uncertainty. By constructing a framework, this paper explores the effect of ambidexterity of uncertainty on network vulnerability in ambidextrous perspective, and further examines the mediating effect of network routine. Then an empirical test is made by multiple regression models with high-tech industry of innovation cooperation. The results show that:Ambidexterity of uncertainty can be divided into combined uncertainty and balanced uncertainty, which have significant positive relationship with network vulnerability. Conventional routines and flexible routines are original divided by network routines, which have negative effect on network vulnerability. The ambidexterity of uncertainty not only has inhibitory effect on network routines, but also the combined uncertainty is better for conventional routines and the balanced uncertainty is better for flexible routines. The meditative effects of network routines have differences between conventional routines and flexible routines. Conventional routines have more meditative effect between combined uncertainty and network vulnerability for the network leading enterprise. Flexible routines have more meditative effect between balanced uncertainty and network vulnerability for the network cooperative enterprise. This research can reveal the reduction mechanism of network vulnerability; it is significantly meaningful for improving the anti-risk capacity of technological innovation network.

Key words: technology innovation, organization network, network routine, ambidexterity of uncertainty, network vulnerability

魏龙, 党兴华, 成泷. 不确定性双元对技术创新网络脆弱性的影响：网络惯例的中介作用[J]. , 2018, 30(7): 64-76.

Wei Long, Dang Xinghua, Cheng Long. The Ambidexterity of Uncertainty and Effect on Vulnerability of Technological Innovation Network: Network Routine as a Mediator[J]. , 2018, 30(7): 64-76.

参考文献

[1] Majchrzak A., Jarvenpaa S. L., Bagherzadeh M. A Review of Interorganizational Collaboration Dynamics[J]. Journal of Manage-ment, 2015,41(5):1338-1360
[2] 魏龙,党兴华. 网络闭合、知识基础与创新催化:动态结构洞的调节[J]. 管理科学, 2017,30(3):83-96
[3] Schilling M. A. Technology Shocks, Technological Collaboration, and Innovation Outcomes[J]. Organization Science, 2015,26(3):668-686
[4] Mckinley W., Latham S., Braun M. Organizational Decline and Innovation:Turnarounds and Downward Spirals[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2014,39(1):88-110
[5] Mens G. L., Hannan M. T., Pólos L. Organizational Obsolescence, Drifting Tastes, and Age Dependence in Organizational Life Chances[J]. Organization Science, 2014,26(2):550-570
[6] Karim S., Kaul A. Structural Recombination and Innovation:Unlocking Intraorganizational Knowledge Synergy through Structural Change[J]. Organization Science, 2014,26(2):439-455
[7] Shipilov A., Gulati R., Kilduff M., et al. Relational Pluralism Within and Between Organizations[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2014,57(2):449-459
[8] Pentland B. T., Feldman M. S., Becker M. C., et al. Dynamics of Organizational Routines:A Generative Model[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2012,49(8):1484-1508
[9] Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T., D' adderio L., et al. Beyond Routines as Things:Introduction to the Special Issue on Routine Dynamics[J]. Organization Science, 2016,27(3):505-513
[10] Rogan M., Mors M. L. A Network Perspective on Individual-Level Ambidexterity in Organizations[J]. Organization Science, 2014,25(6):1860-1877
[11] O'reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. Organizational Ambidexterity:Past, Present, and Future[J]. The Academy of Management Per-spectives, 2013,27(4):324-338
[12] 郑小勇,魏江. 商业集团从属企业合法性双元与成长绩效关系[J]. 管理科学学报, 2015,18(6):1-14
[13] 江旭,姜飞飞. 不确定性、联盟风险管理与合作绩效满意度[J]. 管理工程学报, 2015,29(3):180-190
[14] 张延禄,杨乃定. R&D网络风险相继传播模型构建及仿真[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2014,34(3):723-731
[15] Cao Q., Gedajlovic E., Zhang H. Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity:Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects[J]. Organization Science, 2009,20(4):781-796
[16] Gao J., Buldyrev S. V., Havlin S., et al. Robustness of a Network of Networks[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2011,107(19):3096-3100
[17] Reis S. D., Hu Y., Babino A., et al. Avoiding Catastrophic Failure in Correlated Networks of Networks[J]. Nature Physics, 2014,10(10):762-767
[18] Hernandez E., Sanders W. G., Tuschke A. Network Defense:Pruning, Grafting, and Closing to Prevent Leakage of Strategic Knowledge to Rivals[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2014,58(4):1233-1260
[19] 陈伟,周文,郎益夫. 集聚结构、中介性与集群创新网络抗风险能力研究——以东北新能源汽车产业集群为例[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(10):204-217
[20] 魏龙,党兴华. 网络权力、网络搜寻与网络惯例——一个交互效应模型[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2017,38(2):136-147
[21] Bresman H. Changing Routines:A Process Model of Vicarious Group Learning in Pharmaceutical R&D[J]. Academy of Manage-ment Journal, 2013,56(1):35-61
[22] Heimeriks K. H., Schijven M., Gates S. Manifestations of Higher-Order Routines:The Underlying Mechanisms of Deliberate Learning in the Context of Post-Acquisition Integration[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2012,55(3):703-726
[23] Ashforth B. E., Rogers K. M., Corley K. G. Identity in Organizations:Exploring Cross-Level Dynamics[J]. Organization Sci-ence, 2011,22(5):1144-1156
[24] 魏龙,党兴华. 惯例复制行为对技术创新网络演化的影响研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2017,35(1):146-160
[25] 宋晶,孙永磊. 合作创新网络能力的形成机理研究——影响因素探索和实证分析[J]. 管理评论, 2016,28(3):67-75
[26] 陈彦亮,高闯. 基于组织双元能力的惯例复制机制研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014,(10):147-159
[27] Heidl R. A., Steensma H. K., Phelps C. Divisive Faultlines and the Unplanned Dissolutions of Multipartner alliances[J]. Organ-ization Science, 2014,25(5):1351-1371
[28] 孙永磊,党兴华,宋晶. 网络惯例形成的影响因素探索及实证研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2014,32(2):267-275
[29] Sangyoon Y., Knudsen T., Becker M. C. Inertia in Routines:A Hidden Source of Organizational Variation[J]. Organization Sci-ence, 2016,27(3):782-800
[30] Jandhyala S., Phene A. The Role of Intergovernmental Organizations in Cross-Border Knowledge Transfer and Innovation[J]. Ad-ministrative Science Quarterly, 2015,60(4):712-743
[31] Ahuja G., Soda G., Zaheer A. The Genesis and Dynamics of Organizational Networks[J]. Organization Science, 2012,23(2):434-448
[32] Vuori T. O., Huy Q. N. Distributed Attention and Shared Emotions in the Innovation Process How Nokia Lost the Smartphone Battle[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2016,61(1):9-51
[33] Zhang J., Baden-Fuller C. The Influence of Technological Knowledge Base and Organizational Structure on Technology Collabora-tion[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2010,47(4):679-704
[34] Dionysiou D. D., Tsoukas H. Understanding the (Re) Creation of Routines from Within:A Symbolic Interactions Perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2013,38(2):181-205
[35] 刘家国,周粤湘,卢斌,等. 基于突发事件风险的供应链脆弱性削减机制[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2015,35(3):556-566
[36] Pentland B. T., Hærem T., Hillison D. The (N) ever-Changing World:Stability and Change in Organizational Routines[J]. Or-ganization Science, 2011,22(6):1369-1383
[37] Liu Y., Luo Y., Liu T. Governing Buyer-Supplier Relationships through Transactional and Relational Mechanisms:Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2009,27(4):294-309