当后发企业接近技术创新的前沿:国际化的“跳板作用”

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

当前，越来越多的后发企业正在或已经接近技术创新的前沿，并试图利用国际化的"跳板作用"实现从模仿者向创新者的转型，但现有文献对此缺乏应有的关注和深入的研究。本文运用扎根理论研究法对4家国际化企业进行了多案例研究，旨在挖掘后发企业国际化过程中的创新追赶机制。研究发现：后发企业国际化的"跳板作用"表现为边界跨越、研发网络重构、战略性组织学习和创新追赶。追赶瓶颈是后发企业国际化的动因，战略能力和吸收能力是"跳板作用"的能力基础，边界跨越是"跳板作用"的起点，研发网络重构、战略性组织学习是"跳板作用"的关键与核心，创新追赶是"跳板作用"的结果。这些发现丰富了后发企业国际化和创新追赶的相关理论，对于中国企业的创新追赶具有一定的实践指导意义。

关键词: 后发企业, 国际化, 跳板作用, 创新追赶, 扎根理论

Abstract:

At present, more and more latecomer firms are approaching or have already approached the technological innovation frontier, and attempt to transform from imitators to innovators by taking advantage of "the springboard effects" of internationalization, while existing literatures lack proper attention and in-depth research on this subject. Using the grounded theory methods, this paper carries out a multiple-cases study on four international enterprises to explore the innovation catching-up mechanism in internationalization process. This paper finds that, "the springboard effects" display as boundary spanning, R&D network reconstruction and strategic organizational learning. The bottlenecks of catching-up are the motivation of "the springboard effects" for latecomer firms, the strategic capability and absorptive capacity are the foundations of "the springboard effects". Boundary spanning is the starting point of "the springboard effects". R&D network reconstruction is the key issue, strategic organizational learning is the core stage and innovation catching-up is the result of "the springboard effects". These findings can enrich relevant theories of internationalization and technological catching-up of latecomer firms. At the same time, they have practical significances for innovation catching-up of Chinese enterprises.

Key words: latecomer firms, internationalization, springboard effects, innovation catching-up, grounded theory

吴先明, 高厚宾, 邵福泽. 当后发企业接近技术创新的前沿:国际化的“跳板作用”[J]. , 2018, 30(6): 40-54.

Wu Xianming, Gao Houbin, Shao Fuze. When Latecomer Firms Approach the Frontier of Technological Innovation:“The Springboard Effects” of Internationalization[J]. , 2018, 30(6): 40-54.

参考文献

[1] 陆剑,柳剑平,程时雄.中国与OECD主要国家工业行业技术差距的动态测度[J].世界经济, 2014,(9):25-52
[2] 张米尔,田丹.从引进到集成:技术能力成长路径转变研究——"天花板"效应与中国企业的应对策略[J].公共管理学报, 2008,5(1):84-90
[3] Hobday M., Rush H., Bessant J.Approaching the Innovation Frontier in Korea:The Transition Phase to Leadership[J].Research Policy, 2004,33(10):1433-1457
[4] Luo Y., Tung R.L.International Expansion of Emerging Market Enterprises:A Springboard Perspective[J].Journal of International Business Studies, 2007,38(4):481-498
[5] Dutrénit G.Building Technological Capabilities in Latecomer Firms:A Review Essay[J].Science Technology & Society, 2004,9(2):209-241
[6] Gerschenkron A.Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective:A Book of Essays[C].Cambridge, MA:Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1962
[7] Hobday M.East Latecomer Firms:Learning the Technology of Electronics[J].Word Development, 1995,23(7):1171-1193
[8] 吴先明,苏志文.将跨国并购作为技术追赶的杠杆:动态能力视角[J].管理世界, 2014,(4):149-164
[9] Luo Y., Sun J., Wang S.L.Emerging Economy Copycats[J].The Academy of Management Perspectives, 2011,25(2):37-56
[10] 江诗松,龚丽敏,徐逸飞,等.转型经济背景下国有和民营后发企业创新能力的追赶动力学:一个仿真研究[J].管理工程学报, 2015,29(4):35-48
[11] Xu D., Meyer K.E.Linking Theory and Context:'Strategy Research in Emerging Economies' after Wright et al.(2005)[J].Journal of Management Studies, 2013,50(7):1322-1346
[12] Lee K., Lim C.Technological Regimes, Catching-up and Leapfrogging:Findings from the Korean Industries[J].Research Policy, 2001,30(3):459-483
[13] Mathews J.A.Dragon Multinationals:New Players in 21st Century Globalization[J].Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2006, 23(1):5-27
[14] Chang S.J., Chung C.N., Mahmood I.P.When and How Does Business Group Affiliation Promote Firm Innovation? A Tale of Two Emerging Economies[J].Organization Science, 2006,17(5):637-656
[15] 刘洋,魏江,江诗松.后发企业如何进行创新追赶?——研发网络边界拓展的视角[J].管理世界, 2013,(3):96-110
[16] 林润辉,周常宝,李康宏,等.技术追赶过程中后发企业创新能力的构建——基于中国西电集团公司的案例研究[J].研究与发展管理, 2016,28(1):40-51
[17] Kafouros M.L., Buckley P.J., Sharp J.A.The Role of Internationalization in Explaining Innovation Performance[J].Technovation, 2008,28(1):63-74
[18] Kafouros M.L.The Impact of the Internet on R&D-efficiency:Theory and Evidence[J].Technovation, 2006,26(7):827-835
[19] Zahra S.A., Ireland R.D., Hitt M.A.International Expansion by New Venture Firms:International Diversity, Mode of Market Entry, Technological Learning and Performance[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2000,43(5):925-950
[20] Figueiredo P.N.Beyond Technological Catch-up:An Empirical Investigation of Further Innovative Capability Accumulation Outcomes in Latecomer Firms with Evidence from Brazil[J].Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2014,31(1):73-102
[21] 寿涌毅,王伟姣.制造业产品服务系统的价值链设计与重构——基于杭氧的案例研究[J].管理评论, 2016,28(2):230-240
[22] Yin R.K.Case Study Research:Design and Methods[M].London:Sage Publications, 2013
[23] Timmermans S., Tavory I.Theory Construction in Qualitative Research:From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis[J].Sociological Theory, 2012,30(3):167-186
[24] Strauss A.L.Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists[M].New York:Cambridge University Press, 1987
[25] 杜晓君,杨勃,任晴阳.基于扎根理论的中国企业克服外来者劣势的边界跨越策略研究[J].管理科学, 2015,28(2):12-26
[26] Lall S.Technological Capabilities and Industrialization[J].World Development, 1992,20(2):165-186
[27] 杨震宁,李东红,李德辉.中国制造业的产业追赶机制:跨案例研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2014,35(10):51-63
[28] Holsti O.R.Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities[M].Massachusetts Menlo Park, California:Addison-Westly Publishing Company, 1969
[29] Suddaby R.From the Editors:What Grounded Theory Is Not[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2006,49(4):633-642
[30] 许晖,许守任,王睿智.网络嵌入、组织学习与资源承诺的协同演进——基于3家外贸企业转型的案例研究[J].管理世界, 2013,(10):142-155
[31] Corbin J., Strauss A.Grounded Theory Research:Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria[J].Qualitative Sociology, 1990, 13(1):3-21
[32] Pan S.L., Tan B.Demystifying Case Research:A Structured-pragmatic-situational (SPS) Approach to Conducting Case Studies[J].Information and Organization, 2011,21(3):161-176
[33] Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A.Absorptive Capacity:A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation[J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990,35(1):128-15
[34] Nicholas R.Absorptive Capacity, Organizational Antecedents, and Environmental Dynamism[J].Journal of Business Research, 2015,68(11):2426-2433
[35] 吴晓波,许冠南,刘慧.全球化下的二次创新战略——以海尔电冰箱技术演进为例[J].研究与发展管理, 2003,15(6):7-11
[36] Paulsen N.Managing Boundaries in Organization:Multiple Perspectives[M].Hampshire:Economy & Management Publishing House, 2003
[37] Au K.Y., Fukuda J.Boundary Spanning Behaviors of Expatriates[J].Journal of World Business, 2003,37(4):285-296
[38] Gasson S.The Dynamics of Sense-making Knowledge, and Expertise in Collaborative Boundary-spanning Design[J].Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2005,10(4):24-34
[39] 欧阳桃花,丁玲,郭瑞杰.组织边界跨越与IT能力的协同演化:海尔信息系统案例[J].中国工业经济, 2012,(12):129-140
[40] Rosenkopf L., Nerkar A.Beyond Local Search:Boundary-spanning, Exploration, and Impact in the Optical Disk Industry[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2001,22(4):287-306
[41] Wu J., Wu Z.Local and International Knowledge Search and Product Innovation:The Moderating Role of Technology Boundary Spanning[J].International Business Review, 2014,23(3):542-551
[42] Luo Y., Wang S.L.Foreign Direct Investment Strategies by Developing Country Multinationals:A Diagnostic Model for Home Country Effects[J].Global Strategy Journal, 2012,2(3):244-261
[43] Rottig D., Reus T.H., Tarba S.Y.The Impact of Culture on Mergers and Acquisitions:A Third of a Century of Research[M].West Yorkshire:Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2014
[44] Ahammad M.F., Tarba S.Y., Liu Y., et al.Knowledge Transfer and Cross-border Acquisition Performance:The Impact of Cultural Distance and Employee Retention[J].International Business Review, 2016,25(1):66-75
[45] Dyer J.H., Singh H.The Relational View:Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage[J].Academy of Management Review, 1998,23(4):660-679
[46] 徐娜娜,徐雨森.资源、创新网络与后发企业逆向创新的协同演化——基于海尔集团的纵向案例研究[J].管理评论, 2016,28(6):216-228
[47] Tijssen R.J.W.Quantitative Assessment of Large Heterogeneous R&D Networks:The Case of Process Engineering in the Netherlands[J].Research Policy, 1998,26(7):791-809
[48] Hansen M.T., Mors M.L., Løvås B.Knowledge Sharing in Organizations:Multiple Networks, Multiple Phases[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2005,48(5):776-793
[49] Forsgren M.The Concept of Learning in the Uppsala Internationalization Process Model:A Critical Review[J].International Business Review, 2002,11(3):257-277
[50] Franco M., Almeida J.Organisational Learning and Leadership Styles in Healthcare Organisations:An Exploratory Case Study[J].Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2011,32(8):782-806
[51] Spencer J.W.Firms' Knowledge-sharing Strategies in the Global Innovation System:Empirical Evidence from the Flat Panel Display Industry[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2003,24(3):217-233
[52] Hobday M.Firm-level Innovation Models:Perspectives on Research in Developed and Developing Countries[J].Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2005,17(2):121-146
[53] March J.G.Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science, 1991,2(1):71-87
[54] Sullivan D.M., Marvel M.R.Knowledge Acquisition, Network Reliance, and Early-stage Technology Venture Outcomes[J].Journal of Management Studies, 2011,48(6):1169-1193