管理评论 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 36-48.

• 经济与金融管理 • 上一篇    

环境保护税何以促进企业能源转型

俞剑1, 汪蓉2, 周奕多3, 杨龙见4   

  1. 1. 中央财经大学经济学院, 北京 102206;
    2. 北京联合大学商务学院, 北京 100025;
    3. 北京大学中国教育财政科学研究所, 北京 100871;
    4. 中央财经大学财政税务学院, 北京 102206
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-06 发布日期:2026-11-14
  • 作者简介:俞剑,中央财经大学经济学院教授,博士生导师,博士;汪蓉,北京联合大学商务学院副教授,硕士生导师,博士;周奕多(通讯作者),北京大学中国教育财政科学研究所博士研究生;杨龙见,中央财经大学财政税务学院教授,博士生导师,博士。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(72373172;72373173);中央财经大学科研创新团队支持计划资助。

How does Environmental Protection Tax Promote Corporate Energy Transition?

Yu Jian1, Wang Rong2, Zhou Yiduo3, Yang Longjian4   

  1. 1. School of Economics, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 102206;
    2. School of Business, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100025;
    3. China Institute for Educational Finance Research, Peking University, Beijing 100871;
    4. School of Public Finance and Taxation, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 102206
  • Received:2024-12-06 Published:2026-11-14

摘要: 能源转型是世界各国应对气候变化的重要方式,而市场型环境规制政策是推动能源转型的重要工具。本文以2018年中国环境保护税(简称环保税)改革为准自然实验,利用中国上市公司数据,采用三重差分方法揭示环保税对企业能源转型的影响及其作用机理。研究发现,在污染物征收标准提高的地区,环保税实施能够显著促进污染型企业能源转型。经过一系列稳健性检验后,上述结果依然成立。机制分析表明,环保税的能源转型效应主要通过调整化石能源消费结构和提升绿色创新能力来实现。异质性分析发现,环保税对企业能源转型的促进作用在资源丰裕度高、财政压力大的地区以及资产负债率低的企业中更为明显。此外,本文进一步的经济效应分析发现,环保税在促进企业能源转型的同时还能提升企业的财务绩效和全要素生产率。本文研究结果为进一步完善环保税等市场型环境规制政策提供了重要启示。

关键词: 环境保护税, 企业能源转型, 经济效应

Abstract: Energy transition is a crucial approach for countries worldwide to address climate change, and market-based environmental regulation policies are vital tools to promote energy transition. Using China’s Environmental Protection Tax (EPT) reform in 2018 as a quasi-natural experiment, this paper utilizes the data of China’s listed companies and employs a difference-in-differences-in-differences method to reveal the impact of EPT on corporate energy transition and its underlying mechanisms. The findings show that in regions where pollutants are taxed at a higher rate, the implementation of EPT significantly promotes the energy transition of pollution-intensive enterprises. This result remains robust after a series of robustness checks. Mechanism analysis indicates that the energy transition effect of EPT is mainly achieved by adjusting the fossil energy consumption structure and enhancing green innovation capabilities. Heterogeneity analysis finds that EPT’s promotional effect on corporate energy transition is more pronounced in regions with high resource abundance and high fiscal pressure, as well as in enterprises with low asset-liability ratios. Furthermore, the analysis of economic effects in this paper reveals that besides promoting corporate energy transition, EPT also improves firms’ financial performance and total factor productivity. The findings of this paper provide important insights for further improving market-based environmental regulation policies such as EPT.

Key words: environmental protection tax, corporate energy transition, economic effects