管理评论

管理评论 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 151-159.

• 创新与创业管理 • 上一篇    

基于颠覆性指数的科研机构创新水平测度与实证分析

郭峥1, 谢云东2, 吴登生3   

  1. 1. 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院, 北京 100190;
    2. 中国科学技术大学公共管理学院, 合肥 230091;
    3. 深圳大学管理学院, 深圳 518060
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-02 发布日期:2026-11-14
  • 作者简介:郭峥，中国科学院大学经济与管理学院博士研究生；谢云东（通讯作者），中国科学技术大学公共管理学院特任副研究员，博士；吴登生，深圳大学管理学院特聘教授，博士生导师。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年项目（72404261）；国家资助博士后研究人员计划（GZC20232600）；中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目（2024M763223）。

Measurement and Empirical Analysis of Research Institutions’ Innovation Level Based on the Disruption Index

Guo Zheng1, Xie Yundong2, Wu Dengsheng3   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    2. School of Public Policy & Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230091;
    3. College of Management, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060
  • Received:2024-09-02 Published:2026-11-14

PDF (PC)

0

摘要： 本文引入颠覆性指数，构建了一套用于衡量科研机构创新水平的指标体系，包括机构创新指数及其调整指标、截断机构创新指数等。基于Microsoft Academic Graph数据库中超过1.34亿篇文献所构建的引文网络，系统测算了相关科研机构的创新水平，并以全球物理学领域的科研机构为对象开展了实证研究。研究结果表明，本文所提出的新指标与现有科研产出测度指标具有显著相关性，并展现出独特优势，能够在一定程度上弥补现行科研机构评价体系的不足。同时，物理学领域的传统顶尖科研机构在新指标下依然排名靠前，进一步验证了所构建指标的有效性与合理性。研究成果为科研机构明确创新发展路径、优化科研资源配置提供了有力的理论支撑和决策参考，对推动科研机构创新水平测度的理论发展与实践应用具有重要意义。

关键词: 科研机构, 颠覆性指数, 创新水平, 物理学

Abstract: This study introduces the disruption index and develops a set of indicators to assess the innovation performance of research institutions, including the Institutional Disruption Index, its adjusted indicator, and the truncated version. Based on a citation network constructed from over 134 million publications in the Microsoft Academic Graph database, the study systematically measures the innovation levels of various research institutions and conducts an empirical analysis focused on institutions in the field of physics. The results show that the newly proposed indicators are significantly correlated with existing research output metrics and demonstrate unique advantages, thereby addressing certain limitations of current evaluation frameworks. Moreover, traditional top-tier institutions in the field of physics continue to rank highly under the new indicators, further validating their effectiveness and robustness. These findings provide strong theoretical support and practical guidance for research institutions in clarifying innovation strategies and optimizing resource allocation, and they offer important contributions to both the theoretical and practical development of innovation assessment at the institutional level.

Key words: research institutions, disruption index, innovation level, physics