管理评论 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 163-173.

• 组织行为与人力资源管理 • 上一篇    

顾客授权行为如何激发员工的服务主动性行为?一个有调节的中介模型

郭功星1, 田建2, 程豹2   

  1. 1. 汕头大学商学院, 汕头 515821;
    2. 西南财经大学工商管理学院, 成都 611130
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-17 发布日期:2025-07-10
  • 作者简介:郭功星,汕头大学商学院副教授,博士;田建(通讯作者),西南财经大学工商管理学院博士研究生;程豹,西南财经大学工商管理学院教授,博士。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学家基金项目(72102135;72102189);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(21YJC630015;21YJA630020);四川省自然科学基金项目(2024NSFSC1043);广东省基础与应用基础研究基金项目(2023A1515011966);广东省哲学社会科学规划项目(GD24YGL02);广东省普通高校重点领域专项(2022ZDZX4005);西南财经大学“光华英才工程”项目。

How does Customer Empowering Behaviors Motivate Proactive Customer Service Performance? A Moderated Mediation Model

Guo Gongxing1, Tian Jian2, Cheng Bao2   

  1. 1. School of Business, Shantou University, Shantou 515821;
    2. School of Business Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130
  • Received:2023-02-17 Published:2025-07-10

摘要: 文章基于社会交换理论和调节导向理论,分别引入心理安全感和调节导向作为中介和调节变量,构建了顾客授权行为对员工的服务主动性行为的影响机制模型。基于一项多来源、多阶段的时间滞后研究设计,获得了236份来自服务行业的员工与主管配对样本。研究结论显示:①顾客授权行为正向影响员工的服务主动性行为,且心理安全感在二者之间起中介作用;②员工的促进导向会强化顾客授权行为对员工心理安全感的正向影响,防御导向则会削弱此效应;③员工的促进导向水平越高,心理安全感在顾客授权行为与员工的服务主动性行为之间的中介效应就越强;防御导向水平越高,心理安全感的中介效应就越弱。

关键词: 顾客授权行为, 心理安全感, 调节导向, 员工的服务主动性行为, 社会交换理论

Abstract: Based on social exchange theory and regulatory focus theory and using psychological safety and regulatory focus as mediating and moderating variables, this paper constructs a model to explain the mechanism of how customer empowering behaviors influence employees’ proactive customer service performance. A multi-source and multi-wave questionnaire survey of 236 employee-supervisor dyads from service industry finds that (1) customer empowering behaviors have a significant positive effect on employee proactive customer service performance, and employees’ psychological safety plays a mediating role in the association between customer empowering behaviors and proactive customer service performance; (2) promotion focus strengthens the positive effect of customer empowering behaviors on employees’ psychological safety, while prevention focus inhibits such effect; (3) the higher the level of employee promotion focus, the stronger the positive effect of customer empowering behaviors on employees’ proactive customer service performance through psychological safety; in contrast, the higher the level of employees’ prevention focus, the weaker such indirect effect.

Key words: customer empowering behaviors, psychological safety, regulatory focus, proactive customer service performance, social exchange theory