管理评论

管理评论 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 30-42.

• 经济与金融管理 • 上一篇    

相同引进发展模式下的不同产业绩效对比研究——以芯片产业和高铁产业为例

龚惠群1, 黄超2   

  1. 1. 南京信息工程大学管理工程学院, 南京 210044;
    2. 东南大学经济管理学院, 南京 210096
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-24 发布日期:2025-06-18
  • 作者简介:龚惠群，南京信息工程大学管理工程学院副教授，硕士生导师，博士；黄超，东南大学经济管理学院教授，博士生导师，博士。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目(18BGL015)

A Comparative Study on the Performance of Different Industries under the Same Introduction and Development Model -Take Chip Industry and High Speed Rail Industry as Examples

Gong Huiqun1, Huang Chao2   

  1. 1. School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044;
    2. School of Management and Economics, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096
  • Received:2021-08-24 Published:2025-06-18

PDF (PC)

24

摘要： 为探讨引进发展模式对国家产业发展的可行度，及提升产业绩效时面临的问题，本文构建引进发展模式下的产业绩效评价指标体系，并以2009-2019年芯片产业和高铁产业数据进行实证对比分析。结果表明：芯片产业和高铁产业皆为促进我国社会经济发展的重要有力支撑产业，绩效改善总体情况皆远超国家经济发展速度。其中，投入产出绩效影响度皆为最高，但芯片产业更需重视的是政府财政科技支出，而高铁产业更需保持的是固定资产投资增长率；在研究合作绩效方面，芯片产业亟须提升与高校、科研机构、引进机构的联合研发设计，高铁产业要加强与国外开展技术和标准的合作；在市场绩效方面，高铁产业需要提高国际市场的占有率，提升国际业务利润贡献率，加快海外专利布局战略，芯片产业需要扩大国内市场占有率，进行全产业链的同步创新，同时两个产业都需要注重复合型人才的储备；经济绩效是两个产业都显著存在的薄弱环节，亟须尽快吸引更多社会资本进入，扩大金融投资渠道等，尤其是高铁产业，如何降低资产负债率、提高主营业务利润率和收入增长率等，这是引进发展模式产业共同面临的紧迫问题。

关键词: 引进发展, 高铁产业, 芯片产业, 产业绩效评价, 对比研究

Abstract: In order to explore the feasibility of introducing development mode to national industrial development, as well as the problems faced in improving industrial performance, this paper constructs an industrial performance evaluation index system under the introduction development mode, and makes an empirical analysis based on the data of chip industry and high-speed rail industry from 2009 to 2019. Data analysis results show that:chip industry and high-speed rail industry are important supporting industries to promote China's social and economic development, and their overall performance improvement is far faster than the national economic development speed. The two industries have the highest impact on input-output performance, but the chip industry needs to pay more attention to the government's financial expenditure on science and technology activities, while the high-speed rail industry needs to maintain the growth rate of fixed asset investment. In terms of research cooperation performance, the chip industry needs to enhance joint research and development with universities and scientific research institutions, and the high-speed rail industry needs to strengthen cooperation with foreign countries in technology and standards. In terms of market performance, the high-speed rail industry needs to improve the share of the international market, improve the profit contribution rate of international business, and speed up the overseas patent layout strategy. The chip industry needs to expand the domestic market share and carry out synchronous innovation of the whole industrial chain. At the same time, both industries need to pay attention to the reserve of compound talents. Economic performance of both industries is far from satisfactory. It is urgent to attract more social capital and expand financial investment channels as soon as possible, especially in the high-speed rail industry, which needs to find out how to reduce the asset liability ratio, improve the profit margin of main business and the growth rate of revenue, etc., a problem demanding prompt solution from the industries introducing the development mode.

Key words: introducing development, high-speed rail industry, chip industry, industrial performance evaluation, comparative study