管理评论

管理评论 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (12): 263-276.

• 案例研究 • 上一篇    

重大工程项目廉洁治理的创新机制与实践路径——基于平陆运河“四位一体”治理系统的案例分析

朱帮助1, 刘梦2, 张少华1, 张建易1, 汪寿阳2   

  1. 1. 广西大学工商管理学院, 南宁 530004;
    2. 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院, 北京 100190
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-20 发布日期:2026-01-15
  • 作者简介:朱帮助，广西大学工商管理学院教授，博士生导师;刘梦（通讯作者），中国科学院大学经济与管理学院特别研究助理;张少华，广西大学工商管理学院教授，博士生导师;张建易，广西大学工商管理学院博士研究生;汪寿阳，中国科学院大学经济与管理学院教授，发展中国家科学院院士。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目（23&ZD098）；国家自然科学基金基础科学研究中心项目（71988101）；国家社会科学基金青年项目（24CJL014）。

Innovative Mechanism and Practical Path for Integrity Governance of Major Engineering Projects: Analysis Based on the “Four-in-One” Governance System of Pinglu Canal Case

Zhu Bangzhu1, Liu Meng2, Zhang Shaohua1, Zhang Jianyi1, Wang Shouyang2   

  1. 1. School of Business, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004;
    2. School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190
  • Received:2025-10-20 Published:2026-01-15

PDF (PC)

33

摘要： 重大工程项目以其极端复杂性对廉洁治理体系与治理能力的现代化提出了严峻挑战。本文基于对“世纪工程”平陆运河的深度调研分析，系统剖析其通过构建“制度-技术-流程-文化”四位一体的廉洁治理生态系统，有效破解“工程腐败黑箱”与监督碎片化难题的创新机制与实践路径。案例研究表明：平陆运河以制度创新构筑“不能腐”的刚性约束，以技术赋能打造“不易腐”的数字治理底座，以流程再造形成“不敢腐”的透明运行闭环，以文化浸润培育“不想腐”的价值认同。本文的理论贡献在于提出并验证了技术赋能的“全要素-全周期-全链条”廉洁治理新模式，揭示了“四位一体”与“364”特色实践对治理优化的创新耦合机制，推动了重大工程廉洁治理从“事后惩处”向“系统免疫”的范式转型。结合“147”监督体系、数字孪生平台、“364”特色做法与万众廉洁创新实践，实现了“四位一体”创新机制的耦合与协同增效，产生了“1+1+1+1>4”的系统效能。它超越了传统廉洁治理措施“点状发力”的局限，生动诠释了中国特色社会主义制度优势如何转化为具体治理效能，为全球重大工程廉洁治理提供了可参照、可借鉴的“中国方案”。

关键词: 平陆运河重大工程项目, 廉洁治理, “四位一体”机制, “364”做法, 系统免疫

Abstract: Due to their extreme complexity, major engineering projects face a challenging requirement for modernizing the integrity governance systems and capabilities. This paper, based on in-depth research and analysis of the “Century Project” Pinglu Canal systematically analyzes its innovative mechanism and practical path of effectively solving the problems of “engineering corruption black box” and fragmented supervision by constructing a “four-in-one” integrity governance ecosystem of “system technology process culture”. So far as the case of Pinglu Canal project is concerned, a rigid constraint is established through institutional innovation to ensure no one can be corrupt, a digital governance base is created through technological empowerment to make it difficult for anyone to be corrupt, a transparent operating loop is formed through process reengineering to ensure no one dare be corrupt, and a value recognition is cultivated through cultural infiltration to ensure no one wants to be corrupt. The theoretical contribution of this paper lies in its proposing and verifying a new model of “full element full cycle full chain” clean governance empowered by technology, revealing the innovative coupling mechanism of “four in one”and “364” characteristic practices for governance optimization, and promoting the paradigm shift of clean governance in major projects from “post punishment” to “systemic immunity”. By combining the “147” supervision system, digital twin platform, “364” characteristic practices, and the practice of promoting integrity innovation, the coupling and collaborative efficiency of the “four-in-one” innovation mechanism are achieved, resulting in a system efficiency of “1+1+1+1>4”. It goes beyond the limitations of traditional clean governance measures of “point by point efforts” and vividly interprets how the advantages of the socialist system with Chinese characteristics can be transformed into specific governance effectiveness, providing a replicable and promotable “Chinese solution” for clean governance in major global projects.

Key words: Pinglu Canal Major Engineering Project, integrity governance, “four-in-one” mechanism, “364” special practice, systemic immunity