管理评论 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 29-41.

• 经济与金融管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

网络合作能力与风险投资自我网络动态性——知识属性的调节作用

郜钰格1, 谢永平1, 杨艳萍2   

  1. 1. 西安电子科技大学经济与管理学院, 西安 710126;
    2. 河南工业大学管理学院, 郑州 450001
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-30 出版日期:2023-05-28 发布日期:2023-06-21
  • 通讯作者: 谢永平(通讯作者),西安电子科技大学经济与管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士。
  • 作者简介:郜钰格,西安电子科技大学经济与管理学院博士研究生;杨艳萍,河南工业大学管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(71972153);国家社会科学基金青年项目(19CGL009);陕西省软科学项目(2021KRM181);陕西省科学技术协会决策咨询重大项目(202105);西安电子科技大学经济与管理学院研究生创新实践种子基金项目(2021)。

The Impact of Network Cooperation Capabilities on Ego-network Dynamics of Venture Capital——The Moderating Effect of Knowledge Attribute

Gao Yuge1, Xie Yongping1, Yang Yanping2   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, Xidian University, Xi'an 710126;
    2. School of Management, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001
  • Received:2021-08-30 Online:2023-05-28 Published:2023-06-21

摘要: 基于社会网络理论、信号理论、知识基础理论,构建了网络合作能力、知识属性与风险投资自我网络动态性之间关系的理论框架。利用Wind数据库中2010—2019年相关数据构建8期风险投资自我网络,分别采用组内估计、LSDV与PCSE等方法实证分析网络合作能力对风险投资自我网络的动态驱动力以及知识属性的调节作用。研究发现:网络合作能力分别正向促进风险投资自我网络增长性和多样性;知识深度分别正向调节网络合作能力与风险投资自我网络增长性和多样性之间关系;知识宽度对合作关系起到替代作用,在网络合作能力与风险投资自我网络增长性之间关系起负向调节作用,而知识宽度在网络合作能力与风险投资自我网络多样性之间关系起正向调节作用,为促进风险投资自我网络构建与动态演化发展提供了管理启示。

关键词: 网络合作能力, 知识深度, 知识宽度, 风险投资, 自我网络动态性

Abstract: Based on social network theory, signal theory and knowledge-based theory, this paper constructs a theoretical framework of the relationship between network cooperation capabilities, knowledge attributes and venture capitals' ego-network dynamics. Based on the related data of Wind database from 2010 to 2019, this paper constructs 8 periods of venture capital ego-network, and analyzes the dynamic driving force of network cooperation capabilities on the growth and diversity of venture capitals' ego-network, and the moderating effect of knowledge attributes by using methods such as within estimation, LSDV and PCSE. The results show that network cooperation capability positively promotes the ego-network growth and diversity of venture capital; knowledge depth positively moderates the relationship between network cooperation capability and the ego-network growth and diversity of venture capital; knowledge breadth plays a substitute effect on the cooperative relationship, and has a negative moderating effect on the relationship between network cooperation capability and ego-network growth of venture capital; however, knowledge breadth has a positive moderating effect on the relationship between network cooperation capability and ego-network diversity of venture capital. These findings provide management enlightenment for promoting the construction and dynamic evolution of venture capitals' ego-network.

Key words: network cooperation capability, knowledge depth, knowledge breadth, venture capital, ego-network dynamics