基于智库双螺旋法的会聚科学优先领域遴选研究

管理评论 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 103-111,172.

基于智库双螺旋法的会聚科学优先领域遴选研究

王雪^1,2,3, 杨国梁¹

1. 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院, 北京 100190;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
3. 中国科学院发展规划局, 北京 100864

收稿日期:2021-07-19 出版日期:2023-05-28 发布日期:2023-06-21
通讯作者: 杨国梁（通讯作者），中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院研究员，博士。
作者简介:王雪，中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院，博士，中国科学院发展规划局业务主管。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金专项项目（L1924008）；国家社会科学基金一般项目（20BGL050）。

Research on the Priority Setting of Convergent Science Based on the Double Helix Method of Think Tanks

Wang Xue^1,2,3, Yang Guoliang¹

1. Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049;
3. Bureau of Development Planning, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100864

Received:2021-07-19 Online:2023-05-28 Published:2023-06-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文采用智库双螺旋法进行会聚科学优先领域遴选研究。结合会聚科学优先领域遴选模型，总结其问题特征、功能作用、研究范式和规模尺度，得出会聚科学优先领域遴选属于中规模智库研究问题，提出会聚科学优先领域遴选的关键科学问题，即多元科技目标、相关学科领域和研究基础条件的不可公度性。基于智库双螺旋法，坚持问题导向、科学导向和证据导向，采用外循环“解析—融合—还原”方法，以及内循环DIIS过程融合法和MIPS逻辑层次法，将会聚科学领域的科技目标、关联领域、条件基础等降维解构为若干可以比较的关键因素，形成会聚科学优先领域遴选智库研究方法，以期对科技决策部门识别和遴选会聚科学领域有所助益。

关键词: 会聚科学, 优先领域遴选, 智库双螺旋法, 过程融合法, 逻辑层次法

Abstract: The double helix method of the think tank is used to research the priority setting of convergent science. This study analyzes the characteristics, functions, research paradigms and scale of the priority setting model of convergent science, and concludes that the convergent science and priority setting comes under the category of medium-scale think tank research. Furthermore, we explore the key scientific issues of the convergent science and priority setting, which are multiple technology objectives, related discipline areas and the incommensurability of basic conditions. Based on the problem-orientation, science-orientation and evidence-orientation of the double helix structure of think tanks, the "Parsing-Merge-Reduction" method is used for the outer circulation, while the process of convergence method (Data-Information-Intelligence-Solution, DIIS) and logics layer method (Mechanism-Impact-Policy-Solution, MIPS) are used for the inner circulation. This model deconstructs the scientific and technological objectives, related fields and conditional basis into several key factors that can be compared, thus forming a research method for convergent science and priority setting, which can be used by scientific and technological decision-making departments to identify and select the relevant areas in converging science.

Key words: convergent science, priority setting, double helix method of think tank, DIIS, MIPS

王雪, 杨国梁. 基于智库双螺旋法的会聚科学优先领域遴选研究[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(5): 103-111,172.

Wang Xue, Yang Guoliang. Research on the Priority Setting of Convergent Science Based on the Double Helix Method of Think Tanks[J]. Management Review, 2023, 35(5): 103-111,172.

参考文献

[1] 王雪,张涵. 会聚科学优先领域遴选方法探析[J]. 科学学研究, 2020,38(11):1928-1936
[2] 王炼. 美国会聚研究发展浅析[J]. 全球科技经济瞭望, 2018,33(9):23-28
[3] Roco M. C., Bainbridge W. S. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance[M]. Netherlands:Springer Science+Business Media, 2003
[4] Nordmann A., Bruland K., Bibel W., et al. Converging Technologies-Shaping the Future of European Societies[R]. Interim Report of the Scenarios Group, 2004
[5] Janetos A. C. A New Biology for the 21st Century[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2009,7(9):455
[6] Chang J., Wong S., Newcomb R., et al. The Third Revolution in Medicine-the Convergence of Life Sciences with Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Engineering[J]. IEEE Circuits & Systems Magazine, 2012,12(3):4-7
[7] Council N. Convergence:Facilitating Transdisciplinary Integration of Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, Engineering, and Beyond[M]. Washington, D. C.:National Academies Press (US), 2014
[8] 赵国屏. 合成生物学:开启生命科学"会聚"研究新时代[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2018,33(11):1135-1149
[9] 李琰,喻佳洁,李幼平. 循证科学:构建突破学科界限的会聚共生体系[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2019,19(5):505-509
[10] Jeong S., Kim J. C., Choi J. Y. Technology Convergence:What Developmental Stage Are We in[J]. Scientometrics, 2015,104(3):1-31
[11] Alexander J., Chase J., Newman N., et al. Emergence as a Conceptual Framework for Understanding Scientific and Technological Progress[C]. Technology Management for Emerging Technologies, 2012
[12] Unesco. Method for Priority Determination in Science and Technology[M]. Paris:Unesco Series in Science Policy Studies and Documents, 1978
[13] 陈德棉,刘云,朱光美. 科技优先领域的概念、评价方法及应用[J]. 科研管理, 1996,17(1):17-21
[14] Weinberg A. M. Values in Science:Unity as a Criterion of Scientific Choice[J]. Minerva, 1984,22(1):1-12
[15] National Science Foundation. Report on the NSF Merit Review Process FY2017[EB/OL]. https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2018/nsb201915.pdf, 2022-12-30
[16] 陈玉祥. 科学选择的理论、方法及应用[M]. 北京:机械出版社, 1994
[17] EPSRC. Balancing Capability-How We Set & Monitor Portfolio Strategies[EB/OL]. https://epsrc.ukri.org/research/ourportfolio/setting-monitoring-portfolio-strategies/, 2022-10-20
[18] 邱均平,颜金莲,王大成. 科学发展优先领域的选择方法[J]. 科技进步管理, 1998,15(1):54-55
[19] 蒋芳,杨明,张月鸿. 科技优先领域选择理论方法研究进展与展望[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 2019,41(2):182-192
[20] Keenan M. Identifying Emerging Generic Technologies at the National Level:The UK Experience[J]. Journal of Forecasting, 2003,22:129-160
[21] Sokolova A., Grebenyuk A., Sokolov A. Twenty Years of S&T Priority Setting in Russia:Lessons Learned[J], Foresight, 2018,20(5):449-466
[22] 潘教峰. 科技智库研究的DIIS理论方法[N]. 中国科学报, 2017-01-09(7)
[23] 潘教峰,鲁晓. 关于智库研究逻辑体系的系统思考[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2018,33(10):1093-1103
[24] 潘教峰,杨国梁,刘慧晖. 智库DIIS三维理论模型[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2018,33(12):1366-1373
[25] 潘教峰,杨国梁,刘慧晖. 多规模智库问题DIIS理论方法[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2019,34(7):785-796
[26] 潘教峰. 智库研究的双螺旋结构[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2020,35(7):907-916
[27] 王雪,刘慧晖. 科技优先领域遴选的决策认知偏误初探[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2021,42(3):76-86