管理评论 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 62-79.

• 技术与创新管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

家族控制异质性、制度空隙与企业创新

陈德球, 林程杰, 徐婷   

  1. 对外经济贸易大学国际商学院, 北京 100029
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-24 出版日期:2022-04-28 发布日期:2022-05-18
  • 作者简介:陈德球,对外经济贸易大学国际商学院教授,院长,博士生导师;林程杰,对外经济贸易大学国际商学院博士研究生;徐婷,对外经济贸易大学国际商学院博士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重大项目(71790604);国家自然科学基金面上项目(71872045)。

The Heterogeneity of Family Control, Institutional Void and Corporate Innovation

Chen Deqiu, Lin Chengjie, Xu Ting   

  1. Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029
  • Received:2021-06-24 Online:2022-04-28 Published:2022-05-18

摘要: 中国家族企业历经40多年的发展,家族控制随着外在制度环境发展、家族内部变迁和家族企业成长表现出异质性特征。在不同的控制方式下,家族企业的创新行为有何差异?本文从家族控制异质性特征视角,将家族企业控制权分为股权控制、战略控制以及全面控制,考察控制异质性对企业创新活动的不同影响,探索构建一个家族控制异质性影响企业创新行为的理论框架。研究发现:相比较股权控制和战略控制,全面控制的家族企业更可能进行研发创新;相比较股权控制,战略控制的家族企业更可能进行研发创新;家族全面控制对企业创新行为的影响在制度空隙严重的地区更为显著。地区的制度空隙越小,家族股东加强家族控制以补偿正式制度缺失的需求越低,有助于家族企业引入外部职业经理人、实现现代化管理。进一步研究发现,家族全面控制通过缓和两类代理问题、提高企业风险承担水平等机制促进企业创新。本文在以往家族涉入的分析研究框架的基础上,从异质性角度剖析家族企业不同类型的控制方式,深化了家族涉入对企业行为影响的研究,为家族企业治理提供了新的研究视角。在此基础上,立足我国转轨经济的制度空隙特征,考察不同控制类型的家族企业的创新活动,补充了家族企业创新的文献,揭开了家族企业创新的“黑箱”。

关键词: 家族企业, 控制异质性, 制度空隙, 企业创新

Abstract: Over the past more than 40 years, Chinese family firms have experienced external institutional evolution, internal changes and significnat growth. In this process, heterogeneity has gradually characterized family control. In order to explore how they will innovate under differnt family control modes, we divide, from the perspective of control heterogeneity, family firm control into three types: equity control, strategic control and full control. This paper explores and investigates the different influences of control heterogeneity on corporate innovation activities. The research findings are as follows. Compared with equity-controlled and strategically controlled family firms, fully controlled family firms are more likely to carry out innovation activities. Compared with equity-controlled family firms, strategically controlled family firms are more likely to carry out innovation activities. The influence of full family control on corporate innovation is more significant in regions with large institutional voids. The smaller the institution voids in regions, the smaller the gap between family managers and professional managers. Narrowing the institutional voids may reduce family control and improve the degree of family professionalism. Additional analysis shows that full control can promote corporate innovation by alleviating two kinds of agency problems and improving the level of corporate risk-taking. Breaking through the previous analysis and research framework of family involvement, this paper analyzes different types of control in family firms, which not only deepens the research about the influence of family involvement on corporate behavior, but also provides a new research perspective for family firm governance. In addition, based on the institutional void characteristics of China’s transitional economy, we investigate the innovative activities in family firm of different control types, which supplement the literature on family firm innovation and reveal the “black box” of family firm innovation.

Key words: family firms, the heterogeneity of family control, institutional void, corporate innovation