高技术产品出口贸易网络构建对一国或地区全球价值链分工位置的影响研究：基于社会网络分析的视角

管理评论 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 127-140.

高技术产品出口贸易网络构建对一国或地区全球价值链分工位置的影响研究：基于社会网络分析的视角

钟祖昌, 余佩璇, 肖宵, 孟凡超, 黄秋煜

1. 广东外语外贸大学广东国际战略研究院, 广州 510420;
2. 广东外语外贸大学商学院, 广州 510006

出版日期:2022-03-28 发布日期:2022-04-20
通讯作者: 肖宵（通讯作者），广东外语外贸大学广东国际战略研究院讲师，博士
作者简介:钟祖昌，广东外语外贸大学广东国际战略研究院教授，硕士生导师，博士;余佩璇，广东外语外贸大学商学院硕士研究生;孟凡超，广东外语外贸大学商学院硕士研究生;黄秋煜，广东外语外贸大学商学院本科生
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(71673064;71974039;71573058);广东省自然科学基金项目(2019A1515011475;2022A1515011866);国家社科基金重大项目(20&ZD085);广东省教育厅创新团队项目(2017WCXTD003);广东外语外贸大学研究生科研创新项目(20GWCXXM-40);广东外语外贸大学大学生创新创业项目(S20211846028)。

Research on the Impact of High Tech Product Export Trade Network Construction on a Country or Region’s Position in the Global Value Chain——From the Perspective of Social Network Analysis

Zhong Zuchang, Yu Peixuan, Xiao Xiao, Meng Fanchao, Huang Qiuyu

1. Guangdong Institute for International Strategies, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510420;
2. School of Business, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510006

Online:2022-03-28 Published:2022-04-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 高技术产品贸易网络是一国或地区参与全球价值链分工的重要体现。本文运用社会网络分析方法刻画了一国或地区高技术产品贸易网络特征和全球高技术贸易网络的整体格局，通过对2005—2016年全球50个经济体之间高技术产品贸易数据进行分析，实证检验了一国或地区高技术产品出口贸易网络对该国或地区全球价值链分工地位和嵌入程度的影响，探讨了高技术产品出口和进口贸易网络之间的互动作用及其对全球价值链分工位置的影响。研究结果表明：（1）自2005年起，全球高技术产品出口贸易网络结构出现了一定的变化，这种变化是一个渐进的过程；（2）一国或地区高技术产品出口贸易的网络中心性和联系强度与全球价值链分工位置呈正向联系，网络异质性与其呈负向联系，这说明全球高技术产品出口贸易网络的构建有利于一国或地区全球价值链分工位置的提升和嵌入程度的提高；（3）高技术产品进口贸易网络和出口贸易网络之间存在着显著的互动效应，这种互动效应有助于提高一国或地区全球价值链参与度和分工位置。

关键词: 高技术产品出口贸易网络, 全球价值链分工, 社会网络分析, 互动效应

Abstract: The trade network of high-tech products is an important embodiment of a country or region’s participation in the division of global value chain. This paper uses the social network analysis method to analyze the characteristics of a country’s high-tech product trade network and the overall pattern of the global high-tech trade network. Based on the statistics of bilateral trade of high-tech products for 50 economies around the world from 2005 to 2016, this paper empirically tests the impact of the characteristics of a country or region’s high-tech product trade network on its position and indispensability in the global value chain, and discusses the interactive effect between the export and import trade networks of high-tech products and its impact on the hierarchy of global value chain. The results show that: (1) To some extent the global trade network structure of high-tech products has changed gradually since 2005; (2) The network centrality and connection strength of a country or region’s export trade of high-tech products are positively related to global value chain division position, while the network heterogeneity is negatively related to it. This shows that the construction of global export trade network of high-tech products can improve a country or region’s position and indispensability in the global value chain; (3) The high-tech products import and export trade network have significant interactive effect, which helps to improve a country or region’s position and indispensability in the global value chain.

Key words: high-tech product export trade network, work division in the global value chain, social network analysis, interactive effect

钟祖昌, 余佩璇, 肖宵, 孟凡超, 黄秋煜. 高技术产品出口贸易网络构建对一国或地区全球价值链分工位置的影响研究：基于社会网络分析的视角[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(3): 127-140.

Zhong Zuchang, Yu Peixuan, Xiao Xiao, Meng Fanchao, Huang Qiuyu. Research on the Impact of High Tech Product Export Trade Network Construction on a Country or Region’s Position in the Global Value Chain——From the Perspective of Social Network Analysis[J]. Management Review, 2022, 34(3): 127-140.

参考文献

[1]David S., Kick E. L. Structural Position in the World System and Economic Growth, 1955-1970:A Multiple Network Analysis of Transnational Interactions[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1979,84(5):1096-1126
[2]Smith A., White R. Structure and Dynamics of the Global Economy:Network Analysis of International Trade 1965-1980[J]. Social Forces, 1992,70(4):857-893
[3]Hummels D., Time as a Trade Barrier[R]. GTAP Working Paper No. 18, 2001
[4]Gereffi G., Humphrey J., Sturgeon T. The Governance of Global Value Chains[J]. Review of International Political Economy, 2005,12(1):78-104
[5]Kali R., Mendez F., Reyes J. Trade Structure and Economic Growth[J]. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 2007,16(2):245-269
[6]Reyes J., Schiavo S., Fagiolo G. Assessing the Evolution of International Economic Integration Using Random Walk Betweenness Centrality:The Cases of East Asia and Latin America[J]. Advances in Complex Systems, 2008,11(5):685-702
[7]祝树金,戢璇,傅晓岚. 出口品技术水平的决定性因素:来自跨国面板数据的证据[J]. 世界经济, 2010,33(4):28-46
[8]许和连,孙天阳,吴钢. 贸易网络地位、研发投入与技术扩散——基于全球高端制造业贸易数据的实证研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2015,(9):55-69
[9]马述忠,任婉婉,吴国杰. 一国农产品贸易网络特征及其对全球价值链分工的影响——基于社会网络分析视角[J]. 管理世界, 2016,(3):60-72
[10]陈丽娴. 全球生产服务贸易网络特征及其对全球价值链分工地位的影响——基于社会网络分析的视角[J]. 国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报), 2017,(4):60-72
[11]陈少炜, Patrick Qiang. 金砖国家贸易网络结构特征及其对贸易分工地位的影响——基于网络分析方法[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2018,34(3):12-28
[12]邓光耀. 全球价值链下中国增加值贸易的核算及网络特征研究[J]. 首都经济贸易大学学报, 2019,21(5):34-44
[13]Said F. F., Fang M. A Probe into the Status of Global Countries' Trade Positions in the Global Value Chain (GVC)-Based on Value Added Trade Perspective and Network Modeling[J]. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 2019,8(1):305
[14]Li X., Meng B., Wang Z. Recent Patterns of Global Production and GVC Participation[R]. Global Value Chain Development Report 2019, 2019
[15]孙天阳,肖皓,孟渤,等. 制造业全球价值链网络的拓扑特征及影响因素——基于WWZ方法和社会网络的研究[J]. 管理评论, 2018,30(9):49-60
[16]李善同,何建武,刘云中. 全球价值链视角下中国国内价值链分工测算研究[J]. 管理评论, 2018,30(5):9-18
[17]袁小慧,范金,徐小换. 长三角地区制造业嵌入全球价值链的中间消耗研究[J]. 管理评论, 2018,30(5):127-136
[18]钟祖昌,张燕玲,孟凡超. 一国对外直接投资网络构建对其全球价值链分工位置的影响研究——基于社会网络分析的视角[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2021,(3):93-108
[19]张杰,郑文平. 全球价值链下中国本土企业的创新效应[J]. 经济研究, 2017,52(3):151-165
[20]Burt R. S. Structural Holes:The Social Structure of Competition[M]. Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 1992
[21]Wasserman S., Faust K. Social Network Analysis:Methods and Applications[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1994
[22]Granovetter M. S. The Strength of Weak Tie[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1973,78(6):1360-1380
[23]Freeman L. C. Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification[J]. Social Networks, 1978,1(3):215-239
[24]Koopman R., Powers W. M., Wang Z., et al. Give Credit Where Credit Is Due:Tracing Value Added in Global Production Chains[R]. Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research), 2010
[25]Fally T. Production Staging:Measurement and Facts[J]. Boulder, Colorado, University of Colorado Boulder, 2012,(5):155-168
[26]Wang Z., Wei S., Yu X., et al. Measures of Participation in Global Value Chain and Global Business Cycles[R]. NBER Working Paper No. 23222, 2017
[27]Antras P., Chor D., Fally T. Measuring the Upstreamness of Production and Trade Flows[R]. NBER Working Paper No.17819, 2012