国际合作网络演化与影响研究:CAS和MPG的比较

管理评论 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 89-96.

国际合作网络演化与影响研究:CAS和MPG的比较

王玲俐^1,2, 裴瑞敏³, 杨梅¹, 王建华¹, 李虹¹

1. 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院, 北京 100190;
2. 中国科学院国际合作局, 北京 100864;
3. 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院, 北京 100190

收稿日期:2019-03-21 出版日期:2021-09-28 发布日期:2021-10-09
作者简介:王伶俐,中国科学院大学经济与管理学院,博士研究生;裴瑞敏,中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院副研究员;杨梅,中国科学院大学经济与管理学院硕士研究生;王建华,中国科学院大学经济与管理学院硕士研究生;李虹,中国科学院大学经济与管理学院副教授。

Evolution and Impact of International Cooperation Networks: A Comparison between CAS and MPG

Wang Lingli^1,2, Pei Ruimin³, Yang Mei¹, Wang Jianhua¹, Li Hong¹

1. School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
2. Bureau of International Cooperation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100864;
3. Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190

Received:2019-03-21 Online:2021-09-28 Published:2021-10-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文采用科学计量学和社会网络分析的方法，以细胞生物学领域为例，选取中国科学院（CAS）和德国马普学会（MPG）发表的科研论文为样本数据，比较研究了CAS和MPG在细胞生物学领域的国际合作网络的结构、特点和发展趋势。研究结果显示：CAS在细胞生物学领域呈现更快的上升发展趋势；在合作广度方面，MPG要优于CAS；在合作紧密度和发展趋势方面，CAS要优于MPG。回归分析结果表明，国际合作强度与科研人员的研究表现之间存在正向相关关系。

关键词: 国际科技合作, 合作网络, 演化分析, 中国科学院, 德国马普学会

Abstract: Using the method of scietometric and social network analysis, and taking the field of cell biology as an example, this paper selects the scientific research papers published by Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and German Max Planck Institute (MPG) as sample data, and compares the structure, characteristics and development trend of international network of science and technology cooperation of CAS and MPG in the field of cell biology. Results show that CAS shows a faster growth trend in the field of cell biology. In terms of the range of international science and technology cooperation, the range of MPG's cooperation with other countries is wider than that of CAS. CAS is superior to MPG in terms of the closeness of the cooperation. The results of regression analysis show that there is a positive correlation between the intensity of international research collaboration and the research performance of researchers. The above conclusions have the implications for the international science and technology collaboration policy making and pracitices.

Key words: international research collaboration, international cooperation networks, evolutionary analysis, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Max Planck Research Institutes

王玲俐, 裴瑞敏, 杨梅, 王建华, 李虹. 国际合作网络演化与影响研究:CAS和MPG的比较[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(9): 89-96.

Wang Lingli, Pei Ruimin, Yang Mei, Wang Jianhua, Li Hong. Evolution and Impact of International Cooperation Networks: A Comparison between CAS and MPG[J]. Management Review, 2021, 33(9): 89-96.

参考文献

[1] 金炬,马峥,梁战平. 从中美合著论文状况看中美科技合作[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2007,28(5):41-47
[2] 王春雷,罗宏清. 科研合作的研究综述[J]. 时代金融, 2016,(8):320-321
[3] 谢彩霞. 科学合作方式及其功能的科学计量学研究[D]. 大连理工大学博士学位论文, 2006
[4] Newman M. E. Scientific Collaboration Networks:Network Construction and Fundamental Results[J]. Physical Review E, 2001,64(1):016131, DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016131
[5] Owen-Smith J., Riccaboni M., Pammolli F. A Comparison of US and European University-industry Relations in the Life Sciences[J]. Management Science, 2002,48(1):24-43
[6] Luukkonenb T., Tijssen R., Persson O. The Measurement of International Scientific Collaboration[J]. Scientometrics, 1993,28(1):15-36
[7] Wagner C. S., Leydesdorff L. Network Structure, Self-organization, and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science[J]. Research Policy, 2005,34(10):1608-1618
[8] Abbasi A., Altmann J., Hossain L. Identifying the Effects of Co-authorship Networks on the Performance of Scholars:A Correlation and Regression Analysis of Performance Measures and Social Network Analysis Measures[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2011,5(4):594-607
[9] Dorogovtsev S. N., Mendes J. F. Evolution of Networks[J]. Advances in Physics, 2002,51(4):1079-1187
[10] Barabâsi A. L., Jeong H., Néda Z. Evolution of the Social Nnetwork of Scientific Collaborations[J]. Physica A:Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2002,311(3):590-614
[11] Xu J., Chau M. The Social Identity of IS:Analyzing the Collaboration Network of the ICIS Conferences (1980-2005)[C]. ICIS 2006 Proceedings, 2006
[12] Abbasi A., Hossain L., Uddin S. Evolutionary Dynamics of Scientific Collaboration Networks:Multi-levels and Cross-time Analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2011,89(2):687-710
[13] Yun F., Yun-lin W., Ding L. Analysis on the Author Cooperation Network in the Field of Science of Science-A Case of Science Research Management from 2004 to 2008[J]. Science Research Management, 2009,30(3):41-46
[14] Zhai X., Yan J., Shibchurn X. Evolutionary Analysis of International Collaboration Network of Chinese Scholars in Management Research[J]. Scientometrics, 2014,98(2):1435-1454
[15] Miramontes J. R., Gonzalez-Brambila C. The Effects of External Collaboration on Research Output in Engineering[J]. Scientometrics, 2016,109(2):661-675
[16] Shao H., Yu Q., Bo X. Analysis of Oncology Research from 2001 to 2010:A Scientometric Perspective[J]. Oncology Reports, 2013,29(4):1441-1452
[17] Newman M., Barabasi A. L., Watts D. J. The Structure and Dynamics of Networks[M]. Princeton and Oxford:Princeton University Press, 2011
[18] Hou H., Kretschmer H., Liu Z. The Structure of Scientific Collaboration Networks in Scientometrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2007,75(2):189-202
[19] Barabasi A. L., Jeong H., Neda Z. Evolution of the Social Network of Scientific Collaboration[J]. Physica, 2002,311(2):590-614
[20] Kronegger L., Mali F., Ferligoj A. Collaboration Structures in Slovenian Scientific Communities[J]. Scientometrics, 2011,90(2):631-647
[21] Lee D., Goh K-I., Kahng B. Complete Trails of Co-authorship Network Evolution[J]. Physical Review, 2010,82(2):26-31
[22] Tong S., Ahlgren P. Evolution of Three Nobel Prize Themes and a Nobel Snub Theme in Chemistry:A Bibliometric Study with Focus on International Collaboration[J]. Scientometrics, 2017,112(1):75-90
[23] Katz J. S. Geographical Proximity and Scientific Collaboration[J]. Scientometrics, 1994,31(1):31-43
[24] Barnett A. H., Ault R. W., Kaserman D. L. The Rising Incidence of Co-authorship in Economics:Further Evidece[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1988,70(3):539-543
[25] Abramo G., D'Angelo C. A., Solazzi M. The Relationship between Scientists' Research Performance and the Degree of Internationalization of Their Research[J]. Scientometrics, 2010,86(3):629-643
[26] Kato M., Ando A. The Relationship between Research Performance and International Collaboration in Chemistry[J]. Scientometrics, 2013,97(3):535-553