科研项目高绩效路径选择:团队多样化抑或行为整合?——基于NSFC项目的实证研究

管理评论 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 110-118.

科研项目高绩效路径选择:团队多样化抑或行为整合?——基于NSFC项目的实证研究

章磊^1,2, 阎波³, 刘佳⁴

1. 空军工程大学装备管理与无人机工程学院, 西安 710053;
2. 军事科学院国防科技创新研究院, 北京 100071;
3. 西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院, 西安 710049;
4. 陕西师范大学哲学与政府管理学院, 西安 710119

收稿日期:2018-08-18 出版日期:2021-09-28 发布日期:2021-10-09
作者简介:章磊,空军工程大学装备管理与无人机工程学院、军事科学院国防科技创新研究院副教授,博士后,硕士生导师,博士;阎波,西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院副教授,博士生导师,博士;刘佳,陕西师范大学哲学与政府管理学院副教授,硕士生导师,博士。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（L1534031；J0910014）；国家自然科学基金面上项目（71473190）。

The Path Selection of Scientific Research Project High Performance: Team Diversity or Behavior Integration?——An Empirical Study on NSFC General Project

Zhang Lei^1,2, Yan Bo³, Liu Jia⁴

1. School of Materiel Management and UAV Engineering, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an 710053;
2. National Academy of Defense Science and Technology Innovation, Academy of Military Sciences, Beijing 100071;
3. School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049;
4. School of Philosophy and Government, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710119

Received:2018-08-18 Online:2021-09-28 Published:2021-10-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 构建多样化团队是科研项目负责人申请项目时的重要人力资源策略，以期通过多样化团队结构和成员间有效互动来实现科研项目高绩效，但已有研究表明多样化团队结构、互动行为如何影响科研项目绩效的路径仍不清晰。针对此问题，从理论层面整合反映科研项目团队结构的团队多样化、多样化断裂以及反映科研项目团队成员动态行为的行为整合，分析其与科研项目绩效的相互关系，并选取了国家自然科学基金委员会某学部资助的基金项目作为研究对象，验证彼此之间的关系。研究结果表明：科研项目团队多样化并不一定有利项目绩效，甚至会负向影响团队行为整合和项目绩效；科研项目团队多样化断裂与行为整合呈现倒U型关系；科研项目团队动态的行为整合相较于静态的多样化更有利于项目绩效。

关键词: 团队多样化, 科研项目, 行为整合, 项目绩效

Abstract: Forming a diversified team is a human resource strategy that aims to improve scientific research project performance through diversified team structure and productive interaction among team members, but how a diversified team and members' interactive behaviors promote project performance remains unclear. Aiming at the problem, the paper analyses the relationship of team diversity, team faultiness, behavior integration and project performance by selecting of NSFC's general projects as empirical research samples to validate the relationship. The results show that scientific research project diversity is not all helpful to project performance, even it does not have negative effect on team behavior integration and project performance, and scientific research project team faultiness has a U-curve relationship with team behavior integration. In addition, it is also found that team behavior integration is more helpful to project performance than team diversity.

Key words: team diversity, scientific research project, behavior integration, project performance

章磊, 阎波, 刘佳. 科研项目高绩效路径选择:团队多样化抑或行为整合?——基于NSFC项目的实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(9): 110-118.

Zhang Lei, Yan Bo, Liu Jia. The Path Selection of Scientific Research Project High Performance: Team Diversity or Behavior Integration?——An Empirical Study on NSFC General Project[J]. Management Review, 2021, 33(9): 110-118.

参考文献

[1] 刘太刚,刘开君. 论我国竞争性科研项目经费配置模式的困境及优化路径——兼论竞争性和非竞争性科研经费协调投入机制[J]. 天津行政学院学报, 2017,(5):3-10
[2] 宋伟. 论高校科研管理的原则[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2002,14(6):104-107
[3] 徐礼平,李林英. 重大科研项目团队:内涵、特征与研究视角[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2017,(8):51-54
[4] 刘鹏飞,贺霞旭,何克晶. 基于多目标优化的科研项目人力资源配置研究[J]. 计算机应用与软件, 2017,34(5):217-222
[5] Cox T. H., Blake S. Managing Cultural Diversity:Implications for Organizational Competitiveness[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1991,5(3):45-56
[6] Easley C. Developing Valuing and Managing Diversity in the New Millennium[J]. Organization Development Journal, 2001,19(4):38-50
[7] 文琪,赖鲜. 关于高校科研项目申报的几点思考[J]. 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2005,(2):50-51
[8] 刘先红. 科研团队的成员合作特征分析[J]. 知识管理论坛, 2016,1(4):283-292
[9] 刘立. 科研合作十条简明规则[J]. 科技导报, 2015,33(18):112
[10] 赵海信. 高校科研团队建设的研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2007,24(8):188-189
[11] 张莉. 高校科研管理的问题与对策[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2017,(24):15-16
[12] Lin Y., Wu L. Y. Exploring the Role of Dynamic Capabilities in Firm Performance under the Resource-based View Framework[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2014,67(3):407-413
[13] Schippers M. C., Den Hartog D. N., Koopman P. L., et al. Diversity and Team Outcomes:The Moderating Effects of Outcome Interdependence and Group Longevity and the Mediating Effect of Reflexivity[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2003,24(6):779-802
[14] Bradley B. H., Anderson H. J., Baur J. E., et al. When Conflict Helps:Integrating Evidence for Beneficial Conflict in Groups and Teams under Three Perspectives[J]. Group Dynamics:Theory, Research, and Practice, 2015,19(4):243
[15] Levi D. Group Dynamics for Teams[M]. London:Sage Publications, 2015
[16] Horwitz S. K., Horwitz I. B. The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Outcomes:A Meta-analytic Review of Team Demography[J]. Journal of Management, 2007,33(6):987-1015
[17] 杨林. 公司股权结构、高管团队认知多样性与创业战略导向关系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2014,35(5):93-106
[18] Jackson S. E., Joshi A., Erhardt N. L. Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity:SWOT Analysis and Implications[J]. Journal of Management, 2003,29(6):801-830
[19] 杜娟,许卫青. 跨文化团队中团队断层对创造力的潜在影响研究[J]. 上海管理科学, 2017,39(5):92-97
[20] Thatcher S. M. B., Jehn K. A., Zanutto E. Cracks in Diversity Research:The Effects of Diversity Faultlines on Conflict and Performance[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2003,12(3):217-241
[21] Lau D. C., Murnighan J. K. Demographic Diversity and Faultlines:The Compositional Dynamics of Organizational Groups[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1998,23(2):325-340
[22] Hambrick D. C. Top Management Groups:A Conceptual Integration and Reconsideration of the "Team" Label[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1994,(16):171
[23] 邱家彦. 转换型领导、团队异质性及团队冲突与团队学习关系之探讨:团队行为整合之中介角色[D]. 国立中山大学博士学位论文, 2005
[24] 周寄中,杨列勋,许治. 关于国家自然科学基金管理科学部资助项目后评估的研究[J]. 管理评论, 2007,19(3):13-19
[25] 孟太生. 科研团队领导行为及其影响团队效能的研究[D]. 电子科技大学博士学位论文, 2008
[26] 蓝国华. 新型社会科学研究机构建设的目标与内容——作为组织系统的社会科学研究机构建设[J]. 社会科学管理与评论, 2012,(2):91-97
[27] 马卫华,肖丁丁,许治. 大学学术团队核心能力成长的"平台-台阶"模式研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2011,32(2):146-150
[28] 侯楠,杨皎平,戴万亮. 团队异质性、外部社会资本对团队成员创新绩效影响的跨层次研究[J]. 管理学报, 2016,13(2):212-220
[29] Flynn F. J., Chatman J. A., Spataro S. E. Getting to Know You:The Influence of Personality on Impressions and Performance of Demographically Different People in Organizations[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2001,46(9):414-442
[30] Jehn K. A., Northcraft G. B., Neale M. A. Why Differences Make a Difference:A Field of Diversity, Conflict and Performance in Workgroups[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999,44(4):741-763
[31] Aaltonen K., Kujala J. A Project Lifecycle Perspective on Stakeholder Influence Strategies in Global Projects[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 2010,26(4):381-397
[32] 杨卫. 夯实源头储备服务创新驱动努力开创科学基金改革发展新局面[J]. 中国科学基金, 2014,28(3):163-167
[33] Jehn K. A., Northcraft G. B., Neale M. A. Why Differences Make a Difference:A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict, and Performance in Workgroups[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999,44(4):741-763
[34] Hambrick D. C. Corporate Coherence and the Top Management Team[M]. In:Hambrick D. C., Nadler D. A., Tushman M. L.(Eds.). Navigating Change:How CEOs, Top Teams, and Boards Steer Transformation. Boston:Harvard Business School Press, 1998
[35] Lau D. C., Murnighan J. K. Interaction s within Groups and Subgroups:The Effects of Demographic Faultlines[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005,48(4):645-659
[36] Pearsall M. J., Ellis A. P. J., Evans J. M. Unlocking the Effects of Gender Faultlines on Team Creativity:Is Activation the Key[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008,93(1):225-234
[37] Homan A. C., Knippenberg D. V., Kleef G., et al. Interacting Dimensions of Diversity:Cross-categorization and the Functioning of Diverse Work Groups[J]. Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice, 2007,11(2):79-94
[38] Mooney A. C., Sonnenfeld J. Exploring Antecedents to Top Management Team Conflict:The Importance of Behavioral Integration[J]. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2001,(1):11-16
[39] Simons R. How New Top Managers Use Control Systems as Levers of Strategic Renewal[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1994,15(3):169-189
[40] Soldan Z., Bowyer K. Behavioral Integration and Performance:The Moderating Effect of Diversity[J]. European Journal of Management, 2009,9(1):62-72
[41] Carmeli A., Schaubroeck J. Top Management Team Behavioral Integration, Decision Quality, and Organizational Decline[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2006,(17):441-453
[42] 吴建南,章磊,郑永和. 科研项目负责人特征与项目绩效的关系研究——基于科学基金面上项目的实证分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2010,31(12):163-169
[43] 吴建南,章磊. 课题制视角下科研项目依托单位对项目绩效的影响——面向国家自然科学基金面上项目的实证分析[C]. 第六届中国科技政策与管理学术年会论文集, 2010
[44] 贺德方. 基于知识网络的科技人才动态评价模式研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2005,(6):47-53
[45] Arnold E., Balázs K. Methods in the Evaluation of Publicly Funded Basic Research:A Review for OECD[M]. Brighton:Technopolis, 1998
[46] Heneman H. G. Comparisons of Self-and Superior Ratings of Managerial Performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974,59(5):638
[47] 胡望斌,张玉利,杨俊. 同质性还是异质性:创业导向对技术创业团队与新企业绩效关系的调节作用研究[J]. 管理世界, 2014,(6):92-109
[48] Hu L., Bentler P. M. Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis:Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives[J]. Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999,6(1):1-55
[49] 王丽平,于志川,王淑华. 心理距离对知识共享行为的影响研究——基于组织支持感的中介作用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2013,34(9):37-45
[50] 崔小雨,陈春花,苏涛. 高管团队异质性与组织绩效的关系研究:一项Meta分析的检验[J]. 管理评论, 2018,30(9):152-163