北美市场原油和天然气联动性研究——基于贝叶斯DCC-GARCH和LSTAR模型的实证分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 油气互为替代品的特征使得二者间表现出一定关联性。北美作为全球最大的油气消费市场，其油气价格的变动及联动将影响全球的能源发展格局及投资策略。文章首先基于贝叶斯DCC-GARCH （动态条件相关多变量广义自回归条件异方差）模型对北美市场原油和天然气收益率之间的整体相关性进行研究。在油气收益率整体相关性较不显著的情况下，通过STL分解研究了二者在趋势、季节和随机项上的动态关联性特征。随后进一步运用LSTAR （Logistic平滑转换自回归）模型分析了原油和天然气趋势走向上的动态关联性的非线性特征。研究结果表明，北美市场油气收益率的动态关联性始终为正向，关联区间为[0137，0216]，中位数为0181，较CCC-GARCH模型（常数条件自相关广义自回归条件异方差模型）的结果更能反映油气间联动的时变性特征，但其关联区间变动幅度较小，不存在显著的相关性。STL分解结果显示，油气收益率在趋势走向上存在显著的关联性，LSTAR模型较AR模型能够更好地刻画油气趋势联动性的波动特征，具有更高的拟合程度。油气趋势关联性在数值2026处发生平滑转换，从低区制向高区制转换的速度很快。该研究结果对投资者提高收益、生产者控制成本、国家相关部门制定相应的能源策略等具有较强的指导意义。

关键词: 原油, 天然气, 联动, 趋势, 非线性

Abstract: The characteristic of oil and gas as substitutes for each other makes the two show a certain correlation. The changes and linkage of oil and gas prices in the world's largest oil and gas consumer market will affect the global energy development pattern and investment strategy. Firstly, the paper studies the overall correlation between crude oil and natural gas yields in North America based on the Bayesian DCC-GARCH (Dynamic Conditional Correlation GARCH) model. In the case that the overall correlation between the two was less significant, the dynamic correlation characteristics of the two in trend, season and remainder are studied by STL decomposition. And then we analyze the nonlinear characteristics of correlation between oil and gas in trend through the LSTAR (Logistis Smooth Transformation Autoregressive) model. The results show the dynamic correlation between crude oil and natural gas yields in North American market is always positive, with a correlation range of[0.137,0.216] and a median of 0.181, the result of which could better reflect the time-varying characteristics of oil and gas linkage compared with the CCC-GARCH model (Constant Conditional Correlation GARCH). The correlation range of oil and gas is small, showing that there is no significant correlation between them. The results of STL decomposition show that there is a significant correlation between oil and gas yields in trend. And, LSTAR model could better characterize the correlation fluctuation and have a higher degree of fitting than AR model. The correlation between oil and gas in trend has a smooth transition at 2.026, and the transform speed from low zone to high zone is very fast. The results of the study have guiding significance for investors to increase their income, producers to control their costs, and the relevant government departments to formulate corresponding energy strategies.

Key words: crude oil, natural gas, linkage, trend, nonlinear

柴建, 林婕, 梁婷. 北美市场原油和天然气联动性研究——基于贝叶斯DCC-GARCH和LSTAR模型的实证分析[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(7): 16-28.

Chai Jian, Lin Jie, Liang Ting. A Study of Linkage between Crude Oil and Natural Gas in North American Market: Based on the Empirical Analysis of Bayesian DCC-GARCH Model and LSTAR Model[J]. Management Review, 2021, 33(7): 16-28.

参考文献

[1] Geman H., Ohana S. Forward Curves, Scarcity and Price Volatility in Oil and Natural Gas Markets[J]. Energy Economics, 2009, 31(4):576-585
[2] Tonn V. L., Li H. C., Mccarthy J. Wavelet Domain Correlation between the Futures Prices of Natural Gas and Oil[J]. Quarterly Review of Economics & Finance, 2010,50(4):408-414
[3] Erdos P. Have Oil and Gas Prices Got Separated?[J]. Energy Policy, 2012,49(7):707-718
[4] Brigida M. The Switching Relationship between Natural Gas and Crude Oil Prices[J]. Energy Economics, 2014,43(2):48-55
[5] Atil A., Lahiani A., Nguyen D. K. Asymmetric and Nonlinear Pass-through of Crude Oil Prices to Gasoline and Natural Gas Prices[J]. Energy Policy, 2014,65(3):567-573
[6] Wolfe M. H., Rosenman R. Bidirectional Causality in Oil and Gas Markets[J]. Energy Economics, 2014,42(1):325-331
[7] Karali B., Ramirez O. A. Macro Determinants of Volatility and Volatility Spillover in Energy Markets[J]. Energy Economics, 2014,46(6):413-421
[8] Batten J. A., Ciner C., Lucey B. M. The Dynamic Linkages between Crude Oil and Natural Gas Markets[J]. Energy Economics, 2016,62(10):155-170
[9] Zhu F., Zhu Y., Jin X., et al. Do Spillover Effects between Crude Oil and Natural Gas Markets Disappear? Evidence from Option Markets[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2017,24(5):25-33
[10] Geng J. B., Ji Q., Fan Y. The Relationship between Regional Natural Gas Markets and Crude Oil Markets from a Multi-scale Nonlinear Granger Causality Perspective[J]. Energy Economics, 2017,67(8):98-110
[11] Asche F., Oglend A., Osmundsen P. Gas Versus Oil Prices the Impact of Shale Gas[J]. Energy Policy, 2012,47(10):117-124
[12] Caporin M., Fontini F. The Long-Run Oil-Natural Gas Price Relationship and the Shale Gas Revolution[J]. Energy Economics, 2016,64(7):511-519
[13] 张跃军,范英,魏一鸣. 基于GED-GARCH模型的中国原油价格波动特征研究[J]. 数理统计与管理, 2007,26(3):398-406
[14] 张跃军,魏一鸣. 化石能源市场对国际碳市场的动态影响实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2010,22(6):34-41
[15] 董秀成,王守春. 基于LST-GARCH模型的国际油价波动研究[J]. 数理统计与管理, 2011,30(3):381-387
[16] 董杰,潘和平,姚一永,等. 基于DCC-MVGARCH模型的石油、股票和黄金市场相关性实证研究[J]. 预测, 2012,31(4):53-57
[17] 邹莉娜,张荣,任庆忠. 天然气储备对天然气进口及国内价格的动态影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017,25(6):132-142
[18] 吴振信,薛冰,王书平,等. 基于VAR模型的油价波动对我国经济影响分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011,19(1):21-28
[19] 张蕾. 基于STAR模型的中国货币需求函数研究[J]. 管理评论, 2012,24(10):11-17
[20] 赵春艳,程璐. 基于STAR模型的中国货币政策对产出影响的非对称性研究[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2014,29(8):48-53
[21] 危黎黎,向书坚. 我国工业增加值季节波动非线性研究——基于SEATV-STAR模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016,24(4):10-18
[22] 宫健,高铁梅,张泽. 汇率波动对我国外汇储备变动的非对称传导效应——基于非线性LSTARX-GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017,(2):84-100
[23] 刘宇. 我国股票市场的非线性研究——基于LSTAR模型[J]. 管理工程学报, 2008,22(1):82-85
[24] 彭方平,李勇. STAR-GARCH模型与股票市场投资策略非线性[J]. 数理统计与管理, 2009,28(4):723-729
[25] 赵新刚,刘平阔. 经济增长与能源强度:基于面板平滑转换回归模型的实证分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014,22(6):103-113
[26] 柴建,梁婷,周友洪,等. 不同区制工业化水平下的石油消费分析——基于Path-STR模型的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017,25(11):47-57
[27] Bollerslev T. Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1986,31(3):307-327
[28] Engle R. F., Sheppard K. Theoretical and Empirical Properties of Dynamic Conditional Correlation Multivariate GARCH[J]. NBER Working Papers, 2001
[29] 赵春艳. 平滑转换自回归模型的理论与应用研究[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2015
[30] 柴建,朱青,张钟毓,等. 国际油价突变识别及分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014,24(1):109-117
[31] Saltik O., Degirmen S., Ural M. Volatility Modelling in Crude Oil and Natural Gas Prices[J]. Procedia Economics & Finance, 2016,38:476-491
[32] Balthrop A. T., Schnier K. E., Shogren J. F., et al. A regression Dscontinuity Approach to Measuring the Effectiveness of Oil and Natural Gas Regulation to Address the Common-pool Externality[J]. Resource & Energy Economics, 2016,44(2):118-138
[33] Nadal R., Szklo A., Lucena A. Time-varying Impacts of Demand and Supply Oil Shocks on Correlations between Crude Oil Prices and Stock Markets Indices[J]. Research in International Business & Finance, 2017,42(7):1011-1020
[34] Kryzanowski L., Jie Z., Rui Z. Cross-financial-market Correlations and Quantitative Easing[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2017, 20(6):13-21
[35] Eraslan V. Do Sovereign Rating Announcements Affect Emerging Market Exchange Rate Correlations? A Multivariate DCCGARCH Approach[J]. Applied Economics, 2016,49(21):2060-2082
[36] Jain A., Biswal P. C. Dynamic Linkages among Oil Price, Gold Price, Exchange Rate, and Stock Market in India[J]. Resources Policy, 2016,49(6):179-185
[37] Hou Y., Li S. Information Transmission between U.S. and China Index Futures Markets:An Asymmetric DCC GARCH Approach[J]. Economic Modelling, 2016,52(10):884-897