产品空间的动态演化

›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9): 12-22.

产品空间的动态演化

张亭¹, 刘林青², 梅诗晔³

1. 西安交通大学管理学院, 西安 710049;
2. 武汉大学企业战略管理研究所, 武汉 430072;
3. 九江学院电子商务学院, 九江 332005

收稿日期:2016-05-10 出版日期:2018-09-28 发布日期:2018-09-29
作者简介:张亭,西安交通大学管理学院博士研究生;刘林青,武汉大学企业战略管理研究所教授,博士生导师,博士;梅诗晔,九江学院电子商务学院副教授,博士。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（71372124；71428005）；国家社科基金重大项目（15ZDB155）。

Study on Dynamic Evolution of Product Space

Zhang Ting¹, Liu Linqing², Mei Shiye³

1. School of Management, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049;
2. Institute of Business Strategic Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072;
3. School of Electronics Commerce, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang 332005

Received:2016-05-10 Online:2018-09-28 Published:2018-09-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

国际市场上不同国家的竞争力究竟来源于哪里?产品空间理论指出产品空间的高度异质性决定了经济体比较优势的演化路径，产生不同经济体之间经济绩效的差异，从而挑战了经济体之间由于存在要素禀赋差异被动参与竞争的传统理论解释机制。产品空间理论现有的研究表明产品空间具有"自稳定性"，而缺乏深入探索不同期间产品空间之间的相关性程度。本文是在全球产品空间动态演化的视角下探索产品空间在时间与空间的运动变化全貌，具体探索产品空间网络结构特征发生变化的程度、变化的性质以及具体发生变化的时间，构建出"传统产品空间"与"新型产品空间"。同时，进一步对典型国家的产品空间的优势产业组合与产业结构进行动态的比较分析，并为未来优势产业组合发展以及产业结构的优化提出相对应的建议。

关键词: 传统产品空间, 新型产品空间, 动态演化

Abstract:

The extant researches on product space point out that the heterogeneity of the product space determines the evolution path of the economies' comparative advantages, and then leads to different economic performance in different countries, which challenges the traditional theory on explaining the mechanism of competition. Unlike these researches that focus on the different structural characteristics in different countries from a static perspective, this paper explores the product space from a dynamic evolution perspective, including the nature, extent and time of changes. What's more, we intend to compare the characteristics of product space among different countries across different time period. We show that product space has a dual attribute. One is "stability", and another is "slow development", which has formed the "traditional product space" and "new product space". By comparing the characteristics of product space between the developing countries, including China and India, with the developed countries, including America and Germany, we also find out that the product spaces of developed countries are more competitive by occupying the dense area of product space, which means the de-veloping countries can develop more products that have revealed comparative advantage to increase the density of product space to get the upgrading abilities.

Key words: traditional product space, new product space, dynamic evolution

张亭, 刘林青, 梅诗晔. 产品空间的动态演化[J]. , 2018, 30(9): 12-22.

Zhang Ting, Liu Linqing, Mei Shiye. Study on Dynamic Evolution of Product Space[J]. , 2018, 30(9): 12-22.

参考文献

[1] 刘林青,谭畅. 产业国际竞争力的结构观——一个正在涌现的研究域[J]. 经济评论, 2014,(3):153-160
[2] Hidalgo C. A., Klinger B., Barabási A. L. The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations[J]. Science, 2007,317(5837):482-487
[3] Hidalgo C. A., Hausmann R. The Building Blocks of Economic Complexity[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009,106(26):10570-10575
[4] Porter M. E. The Competitive Advantage of Nations[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1990,68(2):73-93
[5] Porter M. E. The Competitive Advantage of Nations[M]. New York:Free Press, MacMillan,1990
[6] Davies H., Ellis P. Porter's Competitive Advantage of Nations:Time for the Final Judgement?[J]. Journal of Management Stud-ies, 2000,37(8):1189-1214
[7] Hausmann R., Hwang J., Rodrik D. What You Export Matters[J]. Journal of Economic Growth, 2007,12(1):1-25
[8] 刘林青,黄起海,闫志山. 国家空间里的能力加值比赛——基于产业国际竞争力的结构观[J]. 中国工业经济, 2013,(4):17-29
[9] Grossman G. M., Helpman E. Quality Ladders and Product Cycles[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991,106(2):557-586
[10] Aghion P., Howitt P. A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction[J]. Econometrics, 1992,60(2):323-351
[11] 李支东,金辉. 企业产品创新与网络嵌入——组织学习的中介作用[J]. 管理评论, 2016,28(1):62-72
[12] Ketels C. Export Competitiveness:Reversing the Logic[M]. Cambridge:Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness, 2010
[13] Ketels C. Michael Porter's Competitive Framework:Recent Learnings and New Research Priorities[J]. Journal of Industrial Trade and Competitive, 2006,6(2):63-66
[14] 杨建梅. 复杂网络与社会网络研究范式的比较[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2010,30(11):2046-2055
[15] 林毅夫. 新结构经济学——重构发展经济学的框架[J]. 经济学, 2011,10(1):1-32
[16] 伍业君,张其仔,徐娟. 产品空间与比较优势演化[J]. 经济评论, 2012,(7):103-115
[17] 伍业君,张其仔. 比较优势演化与经济增长——基于阿根廷的实证分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2012,(2):37-46
[18] 后锐,杨建梅,姚灿中. 全球产业重组与转移:基于跨国并购复杂网络的分析方法[J]. 系统管理学报, 2010,19(2):129-135
[19] 金碚,李鹏飞,廖建辉. 中国产业国际竞争力现状及演变趋势——基于出口商品的分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2013,(5):5-17
[20] 张其仔,李颢. 中国产业升级机会的甄别[J]. 中国工业经济, 2013,(5):44-56
[21] 邓向荣,曹红. 产业升级路径选择:遵循抑或偏离比较优势——基于产品空间结构的实证分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2016, (2):52-67
[22] 张亭,刘林青. 中美产业升级的路径选择比较——基于产品空间理论的分析[J]. 经济管理, 2016,(8):18-28
[23] 张亭,刘林青. 产品复杂性水平对中日产业升级影响的比较研究——基于产品空间理论的实证分析[J]. 经济管理, 2017,(5):115-129
[24] Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G., Johnson J. C. Analyzing Social Networks[M]. New York:Sage, 2018
[25] Bayudan-Dacuycuy C. The Philippine Export Portfolio in the Product Space:Potentials, Possibilities and Policy Challenges[J]. Economics Bulletin, 2012,32(1):59-66
[26] Leamer E. E. Sources of International Comparative Advantage:Theory and Evidence[M]. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1984
[27] 刘军. 社会网络分析导论[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2004