基于发包方式的众包平台任务绩效影响因素研究

›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 107-116.

基于发包方式的众包平台任务绩效影响因素研究

宗利永¹, 李元旭²

1. 上海出版印刷高等专科学校文化管理系, 上海 200093;
2. 复旦大学管理学院, 上海 200433

收稿日期:2015-12-11 出版日期:2018-02-28 发布日期:2018-02-10
作者简介:宗利永,上海出版印刷高等专科学校文化管理系副教授,硕士生导师,博士;李元旭,复旦大学管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目（71372115）；教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（16YJCZH165）；上海市教委科研创新项目（15ZS093）。

Study on the Influencing Factors of Task Performance of Crowdsourcing Platform Based on Contracting Method

Zong Liyong¹, Li Yuanxu²

1. Department of Art Management, Shanghai Publishing and Printing College, Shanghai 200093;
2. School of Business, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433

Received:2015-12-11 Online:2018-02-28 Published:2018-02-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

众包平台凭借专业服务的在线交易为需求方提供高性价比、多元化的解决方案。吸引更多创新者参与到众包任务接包中，这对于众包平台运营方提升任务绩效具有重要的现实意义。本研究将接包方参与数量作为衡量众包平台任务绩效的测量指标，通过在众包服务平台"一品威客"网采集实际业务数据，利用实证研究方法对影响平台任务绩效的因素进行分析。研究发现：奖金额度、任务关注人数、任务实际持续时间均对任务绩效有显著正向影响，任务难度对任务绩效有显著负向影响；发包方式对任务难度及奖金额度与任务绩效的关系起到调节作用，即在不同的发包方式下，奖金额度和任务持续时间对于最终任务绩效会产生截然不同的影响。奖金额度对任务绩效的影响在单人悬赏任务和计件任务模式中是显著的，而在招标任务中影响则不显著。研究旨在为企业众包决策的制定提供理论支撑，并且有助于了解不同服务交易机制之间的差异，有针对性地进行众包平台规则优化，提升平台运营效能。

关键词: 众包平台, 威客, 接包方, 任务绩效, 发包方式

Abstract:

Through online trading of professional services, crowdsourcing platforms can provide cost-effective and diversified solutions for the seekers. For crowdsourcing platform operators, it is of great practical significance to attract more innovators to be the solver, thus maximizing the performance of crowdsourcing task. Using transaction data collected from a crowdsourcing platform "EpWeike.com", this study empirically examines the factors that influence the task performance which is indicated by the number of solvers. Results show that award, follow and time have significant positive effects on the task performance; difficulty has a significant negative effect on the task performance; mode moderates the relationships between difficulty, award and the task performance. That is to say, in different contrac-ting modes, award and difficulty have distinct influences on the size of solver group. Award has a significant effect on the task perform-ance in single-mode reward and piecework task mode, but not significant in bidding task mode. This study aims at providing theoretical support for enterprises to make decisions on the crowdsourcing, and to tell the differences between different trading mechanisms and opti-mize platform rules targetedly, thus improving platform operating performance.

Key words: crowdsourcing platform, witkey, solver, task performance, contracting method

宗利永, 李元旭. 基于发包方式的众包平台任务绩效影响因素研究[J]. , 2018, 30(2): 107-116.

Zong Liyong, Li Yuanxu. Study on the Influencing Factors of Task Performance of Crowdsourcing Platform Based on Contracting Method[J]. , 2018, 30(2): 107-116.

参考文献

[1] Yang Y., Chen P. Y., Pavlou P. Open innovation:An Empirical Study of Online Contests[C]. ICIS 2009 Proceedings, 2009
[2] 秦敏,乔晗,陈良煌. 基于CAS理论的企业开放式创新社区在线用户贡献行为研究:以国内知名企业社区为例[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(1):126-137
[3] Leimeister J. M., Huber M., Bretschneider U., et al. Leveraging Crowdsourcing:Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2009,26(1):197-224
[4] 董坤祥,侯文华,周常宝,等. 众包竞赛中解答者创新绩效影响因素研究——感知风险的调节效应[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2016,37(2):21-29
[5] Boudreau K. J., Lacetera N., Lakhani K. R. Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests:An Empirical Analysis[J]. Management Science, 2011,57(5):843-863
[6] 涂艳,孙宝文,张莹. 基于社会媒体的企业众包创新接包主体行为研究——基于众包网站调查的实证分析[J]. 经济管理, 2015,37(7):138-149
[7] 孟韬,张媛,董大海. 基于威客模式的众包参与行为影响因素研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2014,12:112-123
[8] Laursen K., Salter A. Open for Innovation:The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among U.K. Manufactur-ing Firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006,27(2):131-150
[9] Armstrong M. Competition in Two-sided markets[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 2006,37(3):668-691
[10] Nakatsu R. T., Grossman E. B., Iacovou C. L. A Taxonomy of Crowdsourcing Based on Task Complexity[J]. Journal of Informa-tion Science, 2014,40(6):823-834
[11] 吴俊,崔昊哲,赵嘉琪. 众包平台任务分类与交易方式匹配研究——基于国内外众包网站的探索[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2015,32(14):6-11
[12] 李忆,姜丹丹,王付雪. 众包式知识交易模式与运行机制匹配研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2013,30(13):127-130
[13] Burnham T. A., Frels J. K., Mahajan V. Consumer Switching Costs:A Typology, Antecedents, and Consequences[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2003,31(2):109-126
[14] Yang J., Adamic L. A., Ackerman M. S. Crowdsourcing and Knowledge Sharing:Strategic User Behavior on Taskcn[C]//Pro-ceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. ACM, 2008
[15] Yang Y., Chen P. Y., Pavlou P. Open Innovation:An Empirical Study of Online Contests[C]. ICIS 2009 Proceedings, 2009
[16] Snir E. M., Hitt L. M. Costly Bidding in Online Markets for IT Services[J]. Management Science, 2003,49(11):1504-1520
[17] 周俊, 袁建新. 领域知识专用性投资对接收方机会主义行为的影响与治理[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(11):170-180
[18] Frey K., Lüthje C., Haag S. Whom Should Firms Attract to Open Innovation Platforms? The Role of Knowledge Diversity and Mo-tivation[J]. Long Range Planning, 2011,44(5):397-420
[19] Sonsino D., Benzion U., Mador G. The Complexity Effects on Choice with Uncertainty-Experimental Evidence[J]. The Economic Journal, 2002,112(482):936-965
[20] Terwiesch C., Xu Y. Innovation Contests Open Innovation and Multiagent Problem Solving[J] Management Science, 2008,54(9):1529-1543
[21] Afuah A., Tucci C. L. Crowdsourcing as a Solution to Distant Search[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2012,37(3):355-375
[22] Schenk E., Guittard C. Towards a Characterization of Crowdsourcing Practices[J]. Journal of Innovation Economics & Manage-ment, 2011,7(1):93-107
[23] Wang H., Lim S. S. Real Options and Real Value:The Role of Employee Incentives to Make Specific Knowledge Investments[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008,29(7):701-721
[24] Brabham D. C. Crowdsourcing as a Model for Problem Solving:An Introduction and Cases[J]. Convergence, 2008,14(1):75-90
[25] Frey B. S. Not Just for the Money:An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation[J]. Economic Journal, 1997,36(2):941-942
[26] Shao B., Shi L., Xu B., et al. Factors Affecting Participation of Solvers in Crowdsourcing:An Empirical Study from China[J]. Electronic Markets, 2012,22(2):73-82