环境投资对区域空间溢出效应的影响研究

›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 49-57.

环境投资对区域空间溢出效应的影响研究

吴荻¹, 匡海波², 潘仙友³

1. 辽宁师范大学历史文化旅游学院, 大连 116081;
2. 大连海事大学航运经济与管理学院, 大连 116026;
3. 大连理工大学管理与经济学部, 大连 116024

收稿日期:2018-01-19 出版日期:2018-10-28 发布日期:2018-10-23
通讯作者: 匡海波(通讯作者),大连海事大学航运经济与管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士
作者简介:吴荻,辽宁师范大学历史文化旅游学院讲师,博士;潘仙友,大连理工大学管理与经济学部博士研究生
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目（71303027）；教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（16YJC630114）；辽宁省经济社会发展研究课题（2018lslktyb-083）。

Research on the Effects of Environmental Investments on Regional Spatial Spillover Effects

Wu Di¹, Kuang Haibo², Pan Xianyou³

1. School of History, Culture and Tourism, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116081;
2. School of Maritime Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026;
3. Faculty of Management and Economics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024

Received:2018-01-19 Online:2018-10-28 Published:2018-10-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文关于环境投资的研究从环境污染治理投资以及环境基础设施建设投资两个视角来阐释，重点分析两类环境投资与我国区域经济增长空间溢出效应间的响应关系，以及两类环境投资影响的差异性与形成原因。通过选取2004-2014年我国30个地区的区域面板数据构建了空间Durbin模型，计算出各地区经济增长的空间溢出效应，结果显示环境污染治理投资以及环境基础设施建设投资与区域GDP呈现较强的正相关关系，并且对本地区及邻近区域产生溢出效应，即环境污染治理投资和环境基础设施建设投资每提高1%，总的空间溢出效应分别为0.056%和0.052%，对临近地区的空间溢出效应为0.031%和0.029%。表明两类环境投资对邻近地区的正向经济溢出效应相比于对本地区GDP的贡献更为显著，开展环境污染治理投资相比环境基础设施建设投资对区域GDP的影响更为显著。并提出从环境基础设施投融资主体多元化和环境污染治理投资效率提升两方面来促进环境投资的区域空间溢出效应。

关键词: 环境投资, 区域经济增长, 空间溢出效应, Durbin模型

Abstract:

In this paper, the study of environmental investments is explained from two perspectives:investment in environmental pollution control and investment in the construction of environmental infrastructure. It focuses on the analysis of the response relationship between two types of environmental investments and the spillover effect of regional economic growth in China as well as the differences and causes of the impacts of two types of environmental investments. It calculates the spatial spillover effects of regional economic growth with Durbin model based on the regional panel data of 30 regions in China from 2004 to 2014. The results show that there is a strong correlation among the investment in environmental pollution control, investment in the construction of environmental infrastructure and regional GDP, and then the positive spillover effects are generated in this region and adjacent areas. It means that when the investment in environmental pollution control and investment in the construction of environmental infrastructure increase 1%, the total spatial spillover effects are 0.056% and 0.052%, the spatial spillover effects in adjacent areas are 0.031% and 0.029%. It suggests that the two kinds of investments have a more significant positive economic spillover effect of GDP on neighboring areas. The investment in environmental pollution control has a more significant impact on regional GDP than investment in the construction of environmental infrastructure. It also proposes the diversification of the investment and financing bodies in environmental infrastructure and improvement of the investment efficiency of environmental pollution control so as to promote the regional spatial spillover effects of environmental investments from the two aspects.

Key words: environmental investments, regional economic growth, spatial spillover effects, Durbin model

吴荻, 匡海波, 潘仙友. 环境投资对区域空间溢出效应的影响研究[J]. , 2018, 30(10): 49-57.

Wu Di, Kuang Haibo, Pan Xianyou. Research on the Effects of Environmental Investments on Regional Spatial Spillover Effects[J]. , 2018, 30(10): 49-57.

参考文献

[1] Perkins R., Neumayer E. Transnational Linkages and the Spillover of Environment-efficiency into Developing Countries[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2009,19(3):375-383
[2] Siddiqui M. S. Environmental Taxes and International Spillovers:The Case of a Small Open Economy[J]. Energy Economics, 2015,48:70-80
[3] Galletta S. Law Enforcement, Municipal Budgets and Spillover Effects:Evidence from a Quasi-experiment in Italy[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2017,101(9):90-105
[4] Huang J., Chen X., Huang B., et al. Economic and Environmental Impacts of Foreign Direct Investment in China:A Spatial Spillover Analysis[J]. China Economic Review, 2017,45:289-309
[5] Li B., Wu S. Effects of Local and Civil Environmental Regulation on Green Total Factor Productivity in China:A Spatial Durbin Econometric Analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017,153(1):342-353
[6] Wang C., Du X., Liu Y. Measuring Spatial Spillover Effects of Industrial Emissions:A Method and Case Study in Anhui Province, China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017,141(10):1240-1248
[7] 王文普. 环境规制、空间溢出与地区产业竞争力[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2013,23(8):123-130
[8] 张可,汪东芳. 经济集聚与环境污染的交互影响及空间溢出[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014,(6):70-82
[9] 唐李伟,胡宗义. 生产要素、FDI、环境消耗与中国经济增长源泉——基于Biennial Malmquist生产率指数的分解[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2016,36(3):581-592
[10] 陈真玲. 生态效率、城镇化与空间溢出——基于空间面板杜宾模型的研究[J]. 管理评论, 2016,28(11):66-74
[11] 王铭利. 基于联立方程与状态空间模型对中国经济增长与环境污染关系的研究[J]. 管理评论, 2016,28(7):75-84
[12] Pradhan R. P., Norman N. R., Badir Y., et al. Transport Infrastructure, Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth Interactions in India:The ARDL Bounds Testing Approach[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013,104(12):914-921
[13] Duran-Fernandez R., Santos G. An Empirical Approach to Public Capital, Infrastructure, and Economic Activity:A Critical Review[J]. Research in Transportation Economics, 2014,46(9):3-16
[14] Chen Z., Xue J., Rose A. Z., et al. The Impact of High-speed Rail Investment on Economic and Environmental Change in China:A Dynamic CGE Analysis[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2016,92(6):232-245
[15] Holmgren J., Merkel A. Much Ado About Nothing? A Meta-analysis of The Relationship Between Infrastructure and Economic Growth[J]. Research in Transportation Economics, 2017,63:13-26
[16] Samir S., Muhammad S., Pervaiz A. The Long-run Relationships Between Transport Energy Consumption, Transport Infrastructure, and Economic Growth in MENA Countries[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2018,111(5):78-95
[17] 李涵,唐丽淼. 交通基础设施投资、空间溢出效应与企业库存[J]. 管理世界, 2015,(4):126-136
[18] 司增绰. 港口基础设施与港口城市经济互动发展研究[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(11):33-43
[19] 武勇杰,张梅青. 交通基础设施、空间溢出与经济增长关系的实证分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2017,(11):116-120
[20] 孙晓华,刘小玲,徐帅. 交通基础设施与服务业的集聚效应——来自省市两级的多层线性分析[J]. 管理评论, 2017,29(6):214-224
[21] 邓祖涛,吴必虎. 农村居民旅游消费影响因素的空间计量研究——基于静态和动态空间面板模型的比较分析[J]. 旅游论坛, 2017,10(5):28-40
[22] 高铁梅,主编. 计量经济分析方法与建模:EViews应用及实例(第3版)[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2016