基于预付保证金情形下占线租赁策略研究

›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 248-257.

基于预付保证金情形下占线租赁策略研究

吴帆, 辛春林, 刘斌, 陈丽华

北京化工大学经济管理学院, 北京 100029

收稿日期:2016-05-10 出版日期:2018-10-28 发布日期:2018-10-23
通讯作者: 辛春林(通讯作者),北京化工大学经济管理学院教授,副院长,博士
作者简介:吴帆,北京化工大学经济管理学院硕士研究生;刘斌,北京化工大学经济管理学院教授,博士;陈丽华,北京化工大学经济管理学院硕士研究生
基金资助:
国家社科基金项目（13BGL065）。

A Study on the Strategy of Online Leasing under the Condition of Down Payment

Wu Fan, Xin Chunlin, Liu Bin, Chen Lihua

School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029

Received:2016-05-10 Online:2018-10-28 Published:2018-10-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近年来，融资租赁作为企业的一种重要融资手段在中国得到广泛应用。有别于经营租赁，税率差别是企业作为承租人采用融资租赁方式的主要原因之一。本文研究了一类占线融资租赁问题，即设备投资决策者在对未来市场需求一无所知或者有限预知，如何决策采用经营性租赁还是融资租赁?现有文献大多数研究的是占线经营性租买问题。在考虑了税率对融资租赁策略的影响并针对有、无预付保证金情形下，本文分别设计了相应的竞争策略并给出了竞争比。通过算例分析表明：在无预付保证金情形下，占线策略性能随着企业所得税税率的减小而提高；在有预付保证金情形中，占线策略性能随着预付保证金的减少而提高。

关键词: 融资租赁, 预付保证金, 企业所得税税率, 竞争比

Abstract:

In recent years, financial leasing has been widely used as an important means of financing in China. Unlike operating leases, difference in corporate tax rate is one of the main reasons why a lessee uses the lease financing. This paper explores the online financial leasing issue to find out how investment decision-makers, who know nothing or little about potential market demand, decide to use operating or financial leasing? Most studies in the existing literature focus on online lease-or-buy issue. Considering the influence of tax rate on financial leasing policies, this paper designs two online financial leasing policies and gives the competitive ratios in two cases:one with down payment and the other without. The result shows that:in the case without down payment involved, online strategy performance improves as the corporate income tax rate decreases; in the case with down payment involved, the performance of online strategy increases while the down payment increases.

Key words: online financial leasing, down payment, enterprise income tax rate, competitive ratio

吴帆, 辛春林, 刘斌, 陈丽华. 基于预付保证金情形下占线租赁策略研究[J]. , 2018, 30(10): 248-257.

Wu Fan, Xin Chunlin, Liu Bin, Chen Lihua. A Study on the Strategy of Online Leasing under the Condition of Down Payment[J]. , 2018, 30(10): 248-257.

参考文献

[1] Albers S. Online Algorithms:A Survey[J]. Mathematical Programming, 2003,97(1-2):3-26
[2] Karp R. M. On-line Algorithms Versus Off-line Algorithms:How Much Is It Worth to Know the Future[C]. Proc. IFIP 12th World Computer Congress, 1992
[3] Irani S., Ramanathan D. The Problem of Renting Versus Buying[Z]. Personal Communication, 1998
[4] 胡茂林,徐维军. 购买价格递减的在线租赁问题策略设计[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015,22(5):281-287
[5] 张永,张卫国,徐维军. 设备购买价格可变的确定性在线租赁策略[J]. 系统工程, 2009,27(11):52-55
[6] El-Yaniv R., Kaniel R., Linial N. Competitive Optimal On-line Leasing[J]. Algorithmica, 1991,25(1):116-140
[7] 徐维军,刘幼珠. 多策略选择的在线租赁模型及其竞争分析[J]. 系统工程, 2013,31(6):43-48
[8] Zhang G. Q., Poon C. K., Xu Y. F. The Ski-rental Problem with Multiple Discount Options[J]. Information Processing Letters, 2011,111(18):903-906
[9] Lotker Z., Patt-Shamir B., Rawitz D. Ski Rental with Two General Options[J]. Information Processing Letters, 2008,108(6):365-368
[10] 杨兴雨,张卫国,徐维军,等. 基于绩效比和合同约束的多阶段在线租赁[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014,22(2):94-100
[11] 徐寅峰,曹永峰,倪冠群. 基于收益率的在线租赁策略及其竞争分析[J]. 预测, 2011,30(2):51-56
[12] Al-Binali S. A Risk-reward Framework for the Computer Analysis of Financial Games[J]. Algorithmica, 1999,25(1):99-115
[13] Dong Y. C., Xu J. H., Xu Y. F. The On-line Rental Problem under Risk-reward Model with Probabilistic Forecast[J]. Information, 2011,14(1):89-96
[14] 朱志军,徐寅峰,徐维军. 局内租赁问题的风险补偿模型及其竞争分析[J]. 管理科学学报, 2004,7(3):64-74
[15] 徐维军,董玉成,徐寅峰. 收益约束下在线租赁最小风险策略竞争分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2007,16(2):88-93
[16] 张颖,马卫民. 风险补偿模型下的在线库存管理策略[J]. 系统工程, 2014,32(8):87-91
[17] Myers S. C., Dill D. A., et al. Valuation of Financial Lease Contracts[J]. Journal of Finance, 1976:31(3):799-819
[18] Jr C. W. S., Wakeman L. M. Determinants of Corporate Leasing Policy[J]. Journal of Finance, 1985,40(3):909-910
[19] Dai W. Q., Dong Y. C., Zhang X. T. Competitive Analysis of the Online Financial Lease Problem[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016,250(3):865-873