›› 2016, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 154-163.

• 组织行为与人力资源管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

中西方谦逊的研究回顾和比较分析

毛江华1, 廖建桥1, 刘文兴2   

  1. 1. 华中科技大学管理学院, 武汉 430074;
    2. 中南财经政法大学工商管理学院, 武汉 430073
  • 收稿日期:2013-11-07 出版日期:2016-03-28 发布日期:2016-03-31
  • 作者简介:毛江华,华中科技大学管理学院博士研究生;廖建桥,华中科技大学管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士;刘文兴,中南财经政法大学工商管理学院讲师,博士。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金重点项目(71232001);国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(71502175)。

A Review and Comparison of Humility Studies between the West and China

Mao Jianghua1, Liao Jianqiao1, Liu Wenxing2   

  1. 1. School of Management, HuazhongUniversity of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074;
    2. School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073
  • Received:2013-11-07 Online:2016-03-28 Published:2016-03-31

摘要:

随着组织工作环境动荡化、复杂化和不确定性的提高,谦逊作为一种美德逐渐受到了学者的关注。然而,由于中西方文化存在差异,谦逊的内涵和表现可能不同。本文通过对中西方谦逊研究的回顾和梳理,系统地归纳了中西方谦逊在历史、道德价值、内涵、类别、影响因素以及影响效应方面的联系,对比了两者在起源、实践、言语表达以及表现目的方面的差异,并在此基础上为我国学者开展谦逊研究提供了可参考的途径。

关键词: 谦逊, 谦虚, 组织道德

Abstract:

With theincreasing turbulence, complexity and uncertainty of organizational environment, humility as a virtue has attracted more and more attention from organization researchers. However, due to differences between Chinese and the Western cultures, the content and performance of humility in both cultures may also exist differently. Based on a review of humility studies in the West and China, we make a systematic comparison of the Chinese and Western humility in origin, meaning, measurement and organizational performance. Then, we review the current studies of humility, and indicate the direction of future humility studies.

Key words: humility, modest, organizational ethics