中国上市汽车公司所有权属性、创新投入与企业绩效的关联研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

所有权在上市公司表现为"股权"，是公司治理结构的重要基础，会对董事会构成和公司内部治理产生决定作用，因而影响企业创新战略决策过程与创新投入，最终影响公司绩效。既有研究侧重于不同所有制类型企业的创新效率或绩效比较，没有深入探索同一企业内部不同所有权属性对创新投入及企业绩效所产生的影响及影响的变化情况。本研究以中国汽车产业上市的20家整车企业及72家零配件企业为研究样本，将企业年度研发投入强度作为影响企业绩效的主要因素，视企业中国有、私有、外资、机构四种所有权属性为门槛变量，将企业总资产、营业收入、净利润、资产负债率、企业成立年限和上市年限作为控制变量，建立面板门槛计量模型。基于2012到2015年上述公司数据，利用STATA软件进行面板门限模型分析。分析显示，中国上市汽车企业创新投入与企业绩效之间存在非线性关系，而且企业研发投入与企业绩效之间会因为所有权属性的差异而呈现出显著的区间效应。

关键词: 所有权属性, 创新投入, 企业绩效, 面板门限

Abstract:

Ownership in Listed Companies as "equity" has the basic position in the corporate governance structure. It will have a decis-ive role in the arrangement of board of directors and the internal management of managers' incentive equity structure, etc. Thus it would affect the enterprise innovation strategy and innovation investment decision-making process, and ultimately affect the company's perform-ance. The existing researches focus on the innovation of different types of ownership enterprises, without in-depth exploration into the in-fluence of different ownership properties on innovation input and enterprise's performance and changes of such influence within the same enterprise. In this research, we take 20 listed carmakers and 72 listed automobile component manufacturers in China as the research sam-ple. We take the annual R&D investment as the main factors affecting enterprise performance. We take four kinds of ownership attribute as the threshold variables, namely, the state, private, foreign and institutions ownerships. We take the total assets of the enterprise, as-set liability ratio, operating income net profit, enterprises' length of existence and length of being listed as control variables. Then we set up a panel threshold model. Based on the data from 2012 to 2015, the panel threshold model is analyzed by STATA software. Analysis result shows that there is a non-linear relationship between the China listed automobile enterprise innovation investment and enterprise performance, and there are interval effects between enterprise R & D investment and corporate performance because of the different own-erships.

Key words: ownership property, innovation input, firm performance, panel threshold

李显君, 王巍, 刘文超, 王京伦. 中国上市汽车公司所有权属性、创新投入与企业绩效的关联研究[J]. , 2018, 30(2): 71-82.

Li Xianjun, Wang Wei, Liu Wenchao, Wang Jinglun. Research on the Relationship among Ownership Attribution, Innovation Input and Firm Performance of Listed Auto Companies in China[J]. , 2018, 30(2): 71-82.

参考文献

[1] Fitriya F., Stuart L. Board Structure, Ownership Structure and Firm Performance:A Study of New Zealand Listed-Firms[J]. Asi-an Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 2012,8(2):43-67
[2] Hayam W. Capital Structure, Managerial Ownership and Firm Performance:Evidence from Egypt[J]. Journal of Management & Governance, 2014,18(4):1041-1061
[3] Ersoy H., Koy A. The Relationship between Corporate Performance and Ownership Structure:Evidence from Turkey[J]. Emerging Markets Journal, 2015,5(2):9-18
[4] Zhang H., Gao S., Seiler M. J., et al. Ownership Structure, Diversification, and Corporate Performance Based on Structural Equation Modeling[J]. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 2016,22(1):63-73
[5] Iskandar T. M., Hassan N. H., Sanusi Z. M., et al. Board of Directors and Ownership Structure:A Study on Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Malaysia[J]. Journal Pengurusan, 2017,49(6):1-22
[6] Matari E. A., Matari Y. A., Mohammed S. Association between Ownership Structure Characteristics and Firm Performance:Oman Evidence[J]. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 2017,21(1):1-11
[7] 杨瑞龙. 我国制度变迁方式转换的三阶段论——兼论地方政府的制度创新行为[J]. 经济研究, 1998,33(1):3-10
[8] 朱勇. 所有权结构与绩效——基于分地区上市公司的研究[D]. 重庆大学博士学位论文, 2007
[9] 张维迎. 企业理论与中国企业改革[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 1999
[10] Jefferson G. H., Bai H. M., Guan X. J., et al. R&D Performance in Chinese Industry[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2006,15(4/5):345-366
[11] 吴延兵. 不同所有制企业技术创新能力考察[J]. 产业经济研究, 2014,13(2):53-64
[12] 刘和旺,郑世林,王宇锋. 所有制类型、技术创新与企业绩效[J]. 中国软科学, 2015,29(3):28-40
[13] Megginson W., Natter J. From State to Market:A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization[J]. Journal of Economic Litera-ture, 2001,39(2):321-389
[14] Djankov S., Murrell P. Enterprise Restructuring in Transition:A Quantitative Survey[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2002, 40(3):793-837
[15] 吴风来. 产权所有制性质与企业绩效实证研究[J]. 经济科学, 2003,25(3):12-19
[16] Xu X., Wang Y. Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance in Chinese Stock Companies[J]. China Economic Review, 1999,10(1):75-98
[17] 杜莹,刘立国. 股权结构与公司治理效率:中国上市公司的实证分析[J]. 管理世界, 2002,18(11):124-133
[18] Sun Q., Tong W. China's Share Issue Privatization:The Extent of Its Success[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2003,70(2):183-222
[19] Wei Z., Xie F., Zhang S. Ownership Structure and Firm Value in China's Privatized Firms:1991-2001[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2005,40(1):87-108
[20] 徐向艺,张立达. 上市公司股权结构与公司价值关系研究——一个分组检验的结果[J]. 中国工业经济, 2008,22(4):102-109
[21] 吴国鼎. 股权结构、上市板块与企业绩效[J]. 金融评论, 2015,7(1):89-99
[22] 解维敏,唐清泉. 企业研发投入与实际绩效:破题A股上市公司[J]. 改革, 2011,27(3):100-107
[23] 孙维峰. 所有权结构、企业绩效与公司治理机制[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版), 2008,9(6):90-91
[24] 赵洁. 所有权结构对组织冗余与企业绩效的影响研究——基于委托人-委托人冲突视角[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2013,33(3):46-51
[25] Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R. The External Control of Organizations:A Resource Dependence Perspective[M]. New York:Harper & Row, 1978
[26] Choi S. B., Lee S. H., Williams C. Ownership and Firm Innovation in a Transition Economy:Evidence from China[J]. Research Policy, 2011,40(3):441-452
[27] 李政,陆寅宏. 国有企业真的缺乏创新能力吗:基于上市公司所有权性质与创新绩效的实证分析与比较[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2014,34(2):27-38
[28] 吴联生. 国有股权、税收优惠与公司税负[J]. 经济研究, 2009,44(10):109-120
[29] Fan J. P., Wong T. J., Zhang T. Y. Politically Connected CEOs, Corporate Governance and Post-IPO Performance of China's Newly Partially Privatized Firms[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2007,84(2):330-357
[30] Kim H., Kim H., Lee P. M. Ownership Structure and the Relationship between Financial Slack and R&D Investments:Evidence from Korean Firms[J]. Organization Science, 2008,19(3):404-418
[31] 季晓南. 产权结构、公司治理与企业绩效的关系研究[D]. 北京交通大学博士学位论文, 2009
[32] 李占芳. 混合所有制行业R&D网络形成研究[D]. 辽宁大学博士学位论文, 2015
[33] Delbono F., Vincenzo D. Regulating Innovative Activity:The Role of a Public Firm[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organ-ization, 1993,11(1):35-48
[34] Hsin L. M., Hikaru O. Cost Reducing Incentives in a Mixed Duopoly Market[J]. Economic Bulletin, 2005,12(6):1-6
[35] Poyago T. J. R&D Competition in a Mixed Duopoly under Uncertainty and Easy Imitation[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 1998,26(3):415-428
[36] Cato S. Public Monopoly, Mixed Oligopoly and Productive Efficiency:A Generalization[J]. Economics Bulletin, 2008,12(24):1-7
[37] 李春涛,宋敏. 中国制造业企业的创新活动:所有制和CEO激励的作用[J]. 经济研究, 2010,45(5):55-67
[38] Ishibashi I., Matsumura T. R&D Competition between Public and Private Sectors[J]. European Economic Review, 2006,50(6):1347-1366
[39] Falk. M. Effects of Foreign Ownership on Innovation Activities:Empirical Evidence for Twelve European Countries[J]. National Institute Economic Review, 2008,20(4):85-97
[40] Child J. Management in China during the Age of Reform[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1994
[41] Tan J., Peng M. W. Organizational Slack and Firm Performance during Economic Transitions:Two Studies from an Emerging Economy[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003,24(13):1249-1263
[42] Ju M., Zhao H. Behind Organizational Slack and Firm Performance in China:The Moderating Roles of Ownership and Competi-tive Intensity[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2009,26(4):701-717
[43] Peng M. W. How Entrepreneurs Create Wealth in Transition Economies[J]. Academy of Management Executive, 2001,15(1):95-108
[44] Hill C. W., Snell S. A. External Control Corporate Strategy and Firm Performance in Research-intensive Industries[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010,9(6):577-590
[45] Hansen G. S., Hill C. W. Are Institutional Investors Myopic? A Time-series Study of Four Technology-driven Industries[J]. Stra-tegic Management Journal, 1991,12(1):1-16
[46] Kochhar R., David P. Institutional Investors and Firm Innovation:A Test of Competing Hypotheses[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996,17(1):73-84
[47] Sherman H., Beldona S., Joshi M. Institutional Investor Heterogeneity:Implications for Strategic Decisions[J]. Corporate Gov-ernance:An International Review, 1998,6(3):166-173
[48] Hoskisson R. E., Hitt M. A., Johnson R. A., et al. Conflicting Voices:The Effects of Institutional Ownership Geterogeneity and Internal Governance on Corporate Innovation Strategies[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002,45(4):697-716
[49] 张济建,苏慧,王培. 产品市场竞争、机构投资者持股与企业R&D投入关系研究[J]. 管理评论, 2017,29(11):89-97
[50] 邹国平,刘洪德,王广益. 我国国有企业规模与研发强度相关性研究[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(12):171-179
[51] 范黎波,刘云芬,杨金海. 家族化管理与企业绩效:规模与家族成员——所有权结构的调节效应[J]. 管理评论, 2016,28(5):96-106
[52] Hansen B. E. Threshold Effects in Non-Dynamic Panels:Estimation, Testing, and Inference[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1999, 93(2):345-368
[53] 连玉君,程建. 不同成长机会下资本结构与经营绩效之关系研究[J]. 当代经济科学, 2006,28(2):97-103
[54] 郑丽琳. 能源效率、要素投入与经济增长——基于面板门限回归的实证分析[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2012,32(9):48-53
[55] Jushan B., Pierre P. Estimating and Testing Linear Models with Multiple Structural Changes[J]. Econometrica, 1998,66(1):47-78
[56] Michael C. J., William H. M. Rights and Production Functions:An Application to Labor-Managed Firms and Codetermination[J]. The Journal of Business, 1979,52(4):469-506