兼顾社会效益与土地机会成本的保障房选址评价方法——基于高低收入群体居住选址偏好差异的量化分析郑

›› 2016, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (7): 3-11.

• 经济与金融管理 • 下一篇

兼顾社会效益与土地机会成本的保障房选址评价方法——基于高低收入群体居住选址偏好差异的量化分析郑

郑思齐¹, 张英杰², 张索迪¹, 龙瀛^1,3, 杜立群⁴

1. 清华大学恒隆房地产研究中心, 北京 100084;
2. 北京林业大学经济管理学院, 北京 100083;
3. 清华大学建筑学院, 北京 100084;
4. 北京市城市规划设计研究院, 北京 100045

收稿日期:2014-06-16 出版日期:2016-07-28 发布日期:2016-09-01
作者简介:郑思齐,清华大学土木水利学院,清华大学恒隆房地产研究中心教授,博士生导师,博士;张英杰,北京林业大学经济管理学院讲师,博士;张索迪,清华大学土木水利学院,清华大学恒隆房地产研究中心硕士研究生;龙瀛,清华大学建筑学院副研究员,博士;杜立群,北京市城市规划设计研究院教授级高级工程师
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目（71273154）；国家自然科学基金优秀青年基金项目（71322307）；国家自然科学基金重点项目（71533004）；国家重点研发计划（2016YFC0502804）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（BLX2015-40）。

The Evaluation Method of Affordable Housing Site Selection Based on the Trade-off between Social Benefit and the Opportunity Cost of Land: A Quantitative Analysis Based on the Differences in Preferences of Residential Location Choice between High-income and Low-income Residents

Zheng Siqi¹, Zhang Yingjie², Zhang Suodi¹, Long Ying^1,3, Du Liqun⁴

1. Hang Lung Center for Real Estate, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084;
2. School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083;
3. School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084;
4. Beijing Municipal Institute of City Planning and Design, Beijing 100045

Received:2014-06-16 Online:2016-07-28 Published:2016-09-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

保障性住房能够改善受保障对象的居住水平和生活质量，具有明显的社会效益；但城市政府供给保障房用地也意味着损失较多的土地出让收入（较高的机会成本）。保障房的合理选址有赖于对上述社会效益和土地机会成本的理性权衡，这需要基于城市低收入和中高收入居民的居住选址偏好，寻找那些相对于中高收入居民而言，低收入居民更为偏好的区位，这样的区位意味着较高的社会效益和较低的机会成本。本文在北京市1911个微观区块尺度上，以2010年北京市城市居民家庭调查的大样本微观数据为基础，应用显示性偏好法（Hedonic模型）分析了两类群体的选址偏好差异，量化了他们对各个区块的综合支付意愿水平并进行比较，建立并计算了北京市内不同区位的保障房选址适宜性指数。本研究能够为保障房选址决策提供技术支撑，有助于兼顾保障房社会效益和土地出让收入的财政约束。

关键词: 保障房选址, 居住选址, 显示性偏好法, Hedonic模型, 支付意愿

Abstract:

Affordable housing has significant social benefits for improving its target group's quality of life. However, it also results in the loss of land transfer revenues (a lot of opportunity costs) for urban governments. The reasonable site selection of affordable housing projects depends on a rational tradeoff between these social benefits and opportunity cost of land supply. This requires deep insights into the preferences of residential location choice for both low-income and high-income residents, looking for the locations low-income residents are more preferred relatively, where means higher social benefits and lower opportunity cost. In this paper, we quantify their differences in residential location choice preferences on the basis of a large sample micro data from 2010 Beijing Urban Household Survey, using revealed preference method (Hedonic model). Our analysis units are the 1911 traffic analysis zones (TAZ) of Beijing, by comparing these two groups of people's overall willingness to pay for each TAZ, we construct an indicator for affordable housing site selection at different locations. This research can provide technical support for the affordable housing projects' site selection decisions, and contribute to the balance of both social benefits from affordable housing and the financial constraints of urban governments.

Key words: affordable housing projects' site selection, residential location choice, revealed preference, Hedonic model, willingness to pay

郑思齐, 张英杰, 张索迪, 龙瀛, 杜立群. 兼顾社会效益与土地机会成本的保障房选址评价方法——基于高低收入群体居住选址偏好差异的量化分析郑[J]. , 2016, 28(7): 3-11.

Zheng Siqi, Zhang Yingjie, Zhang Suodi, Long Ying, Du Liqun. The Evaluation Method of Affordable Housing Site Selection Based on the Trade-off between Social Benefit and the Opportunity Cost of Land: A Quantitative Analysis Based on the Differences in Preferences of Residential Location Choice between High-income and Low-income Residents[J]. , 2016, 28(7): 3-11.

参考文献

[1] 李晶.保障性住房建设:现状、影响及融资模式[J].国际融资,2010,11(4):26-28
[2] 杨赞,沈彦皓.保障性住房融资的国际经验借鉴:政府作用[J].现代城市研究,2010,(9):8-12
[3] 陈杰.我国保障性住房的供给与融资:回顾与展望[J].现代城市研究,2010,(9):13-17
[4] 陈杰.保障性住房融资亟需担保机制[J].上海国资,2011,(4):39-40
[5] 许丹艳,刘向南.保障房用地规划现存问题影响因素分析[J].城市问题,2012,(2):97-101
[6] 郑思齐,张英杰.保障性住房的空间选址:理论基础、国际经验与中国现实[J].现代城市研究,2010,(9):18-22
[7] 吕艳,扈文秀.保障性住房建设方式及选址问题研究[J].西安财经学院学报,2010,23(5):35-39
[8] 杜静,赵小玲.我国保障性住房选址的决策因素分析——以南京市为例[J].工程管理学报,2012,(1):84-88
[9] 李爱华,韩晶晶,石勇,等.基于数据挖掘的中低收入群体住房保障资格判别[J].管理评论,2007,19(5):21-25
[10] 吴迪,高鹏,董纪昌.保障性住房违规出租问题的博弈分析和治理研究[J].管理评论,2011,23(2):3-10
[11] 吴迪,高鹏,董纪昌.公共租赁房租金定价研究[J].数学的实践与认识,2011,41(5):47-55
[12] 马光红,严国梁.经济适用房空间失配与福利损失问题研究[J].建筑管理现代化,2008,(1):1-3
[13] 李梦玄,周义.保障房建设的社会福利效应测度和实证研究[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2012,(5):29-34
[14] 陈钊,陈杰,刘晓峰.安得广厦千万间:中国城镇住房体制市场化改革的回顾与展望[J].世界经济文汇,2008,(1):43-54
[15] 陈杰.中国住房模式选择向何处去[J].探索与争鸣,2012,(1):61-64
[16] 李宗华,彭明军,黄正东,等.基于多准则决策的保障性住房选址评价[C].多元与包容——2012中国城市规划年会论文集,2012
[17] 汪冬宁,金晓斌,王静,等.保障性住宅用地选址与评价方法研究——以南京都市区为例[J].城市规划,2012(3):85-89
[18] 张祚,李江风,陈双,等.经济适用住房在城市中的空间分布——基于DEM的武汉市实例分析[J].地理学报,2011,66(10):1309-1320
[19] Hanlon J.Success by Design:HOPE VI,New Urbanism,and the Neoliberal Transformation of Public Housing in the United States[J].Environment and Planning A,2010,42(1):80
[20] Whitehead C M.Planning Policies and Affordable Housing:England as a Successful Case Study?[J].Housing Studies,2007,22(1):25-44
[21] Musterd S.Public Housing for Whom? Experiences in an Era of Mature Neo-liberalism:The Netherlands and Amsterdam[J].Housing Studies,2014(29):467-484
[22] Dekker K.,Varady D.P.A Comparison of Dutch and US Public Housing Regeneration Planning:the Similarity Grows?[J].Urban Research&Practice,2011,4(2):123-152
[23] Hirayama Y.Public Housing and Neoliberal Policy in Japan[M].Springer Berlin Heidelberg,2013
[24] Gurran N.,Whitehead C.Planning and Affordable Housing in Australia and the UK:A Comparative Perspective[J].Housing Studies,2011,26(7-8):1193-1214
[25] Chiu R.L.Planning,Land and Affordable Housing in Hong Kong[J].Housing Studies,2007,22(1):63-81
[26] Barton J.,Plume J.,Parolin B.Public Participation in a Spatial Decision Support System for Public Housing[J].Computers,Environment and Urban Systems,2005,29(6):630-652
[27] Johnson M.P.Spatial Decision Support for Assisted Housing Mobility Counseling[J].Decision Support Systems,2005,41(1):296-312
[28] 张小宏,郑思齐.住宅用地供给短缺背后的地方政府动机[J].探索与争鸣,2010,(11):54-58
[29] 郑思齐,张英杰."十二五"期间保障房建设如何"保障"——基于地方政府策略选择的分析[J].探索与争鸣,2013(4):66-71
[30] Rosen S.Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets:Product Differentiation in Pure Competition[J].Journal of Political Economy,1974,82(1):34-55
[31] Epple D.Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets:Estimating Demand and Supply Functions for Differentiated Products[J].Journal of Political Economy,1987,95(1):59-80
[32] Ivar E.,Heckman J.J.,Lars N.Identification and Estimation of Hedonic Models[J].Journal of Political Economy,2004,112(S1):S60-S109
[33] Bajari P.,Benkard C.L.Demand Estimation with Heterogeneous Consumers and Unobserved Product Characteristics:A Hedonic Approach[J].Journal of Political Economy,2005,113(6):1239-1276
[34] Kuminoff N.V.,Parmeter C.F.,Pope J.C.Which Hedonic Models Can We Trust to Recover the Marginal Willingness to Pay for Environmental Amenities?[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2010,60(3):145-160
[35] Kuminoff N.V.,Pope J.C.A Novel Approach to Identifying Hedonic Demand Parameters[J].Economics Letters,2012,116(3):374-376
[36] 谷一桢,郑思齐.轨道交通对住宅价格和土地开发强度的影响——以北京市13号线为例[J].地理学报,2010,(2):213-223
[37] Zheng S.,Kahn M.E.Does Government Investment in Local Public Goods Spur Gentrification? Evidence from Beijing[J].Real Estate Economics,2013,41(1):1-28

兼顾社会效益与土地机会成本的保障房选址评价方法——基于高低收入群体居住选址偏好差异的量化分析郑

The Evaluation Method of Affordable Housing Site Selection Based on the Trade-off between Social Benefit and the Opportunity Cost of Land: A Quantitative Analysis Based on the Differences in Preferences of Residential Location Choice between High-income and Low-income Residents

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价