质量管理实践、组织学习与企业绩效关系研究——基于浙江制造企业的实证分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于国内外文献探讨了质量管理基础实践和核心实践对企业绩效的影响,从组织学习视角揭示上述两者关系的内在作用机制,并构建了相应的理论模型。以浙江省11个地级市424家制造企业为实证样本检验相关假设,研究结果表明:(1)质量管理基础实践和核心实践不仅对企业绩效有直接正向作用,而且两者的协同项正向影响企业绩效,两者的匹配项对绩效有显著负向作用;(2)基础实践通过探索性学习和利用性学习对企业绩效产生间接影响,而核心实践仅通过利用性学习对企业绩效产生影响。研究对制造企业如何实施质量管理实践及实现质量升级具有管理上的启示意义。

关键词: 质量管理实践, 基础实践, 核心实践, 组织学习, 企业绩效

Abstract:

The influence of quality management infrastructure practices and core practices on firm performance is analyzed based on literature review, in which organizational learning plays a mediator role. A theoretical model including quality management practice (QMP), organizational learning and firm performance is testified by using the data from 424 manufacturing firms of Zhejiang province. The results indicate that not only infrastructure practices and core practices have direct positive impact on firm performance, but also their interacting and matching terms have direct effects. Moreover, both explorative learning and exploitative learning mediate infrastructure practices and firm performance, while only exploitative learning indirectly influences the relationship between core practices and firm performance. Managerial implications for manufacturing firms as to how to implement QMP and achieve quality upgrading are provided according to research findings.

Key words: quality management practices (QMP), infrastructure practices, core practices, organizational learning, firm performance

奉小斌, 陈丽琼. 质量管理实践、组织学习与企业绩效关系研究——基于浙江制造企业的实证分析[J]. , 2016, 28(1): 31-41.

Feng Xiaobin, Chen Liqiong. The Relationship between Quality Management Practices, Organizational Learning and Firm Performance: An Empirical Study on Zhejiang Manufacturing Enterprises[J]. , 2016, 28(1): 31-41.

参考文献

[1] Nair A. Meta-analysis of the Relationship between Quality Management Practices and Firm Performance: Implications for Quality Management Theory Development[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2006,24(6):948-975
[2] Wu S. J. H., Zhang D. L. Analyzing the Effectiveness of Quality Management Practices in China[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013,144(1):281-289
[3] Li Y., Wang L. W., Liu Y. Organizational Learning, Product Quality and Performance: The Moderating Effect of Social Ties in Chinese Cross-border Outsourcing[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2011,49(1):159-182
[4] Akgün A. E., Ince H., Imamoglu S. Z., et al. The Mediator Role of Learning Capability and Business Innovativeness between Total Quality Management and Financial Performance[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2014,52(3):888-901
[5] Zatzick C. D., Moliterno T. P., Fang T. Strategic (Mis)Fit: The Implementation of TQM in Manufacturing Organizations[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2012,33(11):1321-1330
[6] 姜鹏,苏秦,宋永涛,等.不同情景下质量管理实践与企业绩效模型的实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2010,22(11):111-119
[7] Flynn B. B., Schroeder R. G., Sakakibara S. The Impact of Quality Management Practices on Performance and Competitive Advantage[J]. Decision Sciences, 1995,26(5):659-691
[8] Dow D., Samson D., Ford S. Exploding the Myth: Do all Quality Management Practices Contribute to Superior Quality Performance? [J]. Production and Operations Management, 1999,8(1):1-27
[9] Kaynak H. The Relationship between Total Quality Management Practices and Their Effects on Firm Performance[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2003,21(4):405-435
[10] Swink M., Jacobs B. W. Six Sigma Adoption: Operating Performance Impacts and Contextual Drivers of Success[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2012,30(6):437-453
[11] Anderson J., Rungtusanatham M., Schroeder R. G., et al. A Path Analytic Model of a Theory of Quality Management Underlying the Deming Management Method: Preliminary Empirical Findings[J]. Decision Sciences, 1995,26(5):637-658
[12] Rahman S., Bullock P. Soft TQM, Hard TQM, and Organizational Performance Relationships: An Empirical Investigation[J]. Omega, 2005,33(1):73-83
[13] Linderman K., Schroeder R. G., Zaheer S., et al. Integrating Quality Management Practices with Knowledge Creation Process[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2004,22(6):589-607
[14] Choo A. S., Linderman K. W., Schroeder R. G. Method and Context Perspective on Learning and Knowledge Creation in Quality Management[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2007,25(4):918-931
[15] Shan S. Q., Zhao Q. J., Hua F. Impact of Quality Management Practices on the Knowledge Creation Process: The Chinese Aviation Firm Perspective[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2013,64(1):211-223
[16] Gavin D. What Does "Product Quality" Really Mean?[J]. Sloan Management Review, 1984,26(1):25-43
[17] Zhang D. L., Linderman K., Schroeder R. G. The Moderating Role of Contextual Factors on Quality Management Practices[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2012,30(1):12-23
[18] Kim D. Y., Kumar V., Kumar U. Relationship between Quality Management Practices and Innovation[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2012,30(4):295-315
[19] Mei M. Q. Z., Laursen K., Atuahene-Gima K. Learning to Innovate: How does Ambidextrous Learning Matter to Radical and Incremental Innovation Capabilities?[C]. The 35th DRUID Celebration Conference: Innovation, Strategy and Entrepreneurship, 2013
[20] Samson D., Terziovski M. The Relationship between Total Quality Management Practices and Operational Performance[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 1999,17(4):393-409
[21] Posen H. E., Levinthal D. A. Chasing a Moving Target: Exploitation and Exploration in Dynamic Environment[J]. Management Science, 2012,58(3):587-601
[22] He Z. L., Wong P. K. Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis[J]. Organization Science, 2004,15(4):481-494
[23] Zhang D. L., Linderman K., Schroeder R. G. Customizing Quality Management Practices: A Conceptual and Measurement Framework[J]. Decision Sciences, 2014,45(1):81-114
[24] Cao Q., Gedajlovic E., Zhang H. P. Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects[J]. Organization Science, 2009,20(4):781-796
[25] March J. G. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J]. Organization Science, 1991,2(1):71-87
[26] O'Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit[J]. California Management Review, 2011,53(4):5-22
[27] Gupta A., Smith K. G., Shalley C. E. The Interplay between Exploration and Exploitation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006,49(4):693-706
[28] Molina L. M., Lorens-Montes J., Ruiz-Moreno. Relationship between Quality Management Practices and Knowledge Transfer[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2007,25(3):682-701
[29] 姜鹏,苏秦,张鹏伟.质量管理实践与企业关系模型研究——扩展知识路径的研究视角[J]. 科学学研究, 2013,31(6):904-912
[30] Kim N., Atuahene-Gima K. Using Exploratory and Exploitative Market Learning for New Product Development[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2010,27(4):519-536
[31] Chen S. M., Yunis M., Jung J. TQM, Strategy, and Performance: A Firm-level Analysis[J]. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 2013,30(6):690-714
[32] 朱朝晖,陈劲.探索性学习和挖掘性学习的协同与动态: 实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2008,29(6):1-9
[33] Sila I. Examining the Effects of Contextual Factors on TQM and Performance through the Lens of Organizational Theories: An Empirical Study[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2007,25(1):83-109
[34] 熊伟,奉小斌.基于企业特征变量的质量管理实践与绩效关系的实证研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2012,42(1):188-200
[35] Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J. Y., et al. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003,88(5):879-903
[36] 侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M]. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2004
[37] 吴艳,温忠麟.结构方程建模中的题目打包策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2004,19(12):1859-1867