管理评论 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 58-73.

• 经济与金融管理 • 上一篇    

专精特新企业数字化生态系统竞合机制研究——基于“局部-整体”视角

王世权1,2, 仪宣彤1   

  1. 1. 辽宁工程技术大学工商管理学院, 葫芦岛 125105;
    2. 东北大学工商管理学院, 沈阳 110169
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-25 发布日期:2026-07-08
  • 作者简介:王世权,辽宁工程技术大学工商管理学院特聘教授、东北大学工商管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士;仪宣彤(通讯作者),辽宁工程技术大学工商管理学院博士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重点项目(25AGL040)。

The Coopetition Mechanism in the Digital Ecosystem of SRDI Enterprises: A Part-Whole Perspective

Wang Shiquan1,2, Yi Xuantong1   

  1. 1. School of Business Administration, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao 125105;
    2. School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169
  • Received:2024-06-25 Published:2026-07-08

摘要: 专精特新企业借力龙头企业赋能,可以缓解数字化转型中的资源约束,但其作为生态参与者面临如何处理与龙头企业竞合关系的挑战。考虑到数字化资源投入的动态性和持续性,针对以龙头企业、专精特新企业和地方政府为核心参与者的数字化生态系统,建立竞争主导型、合作主导型以及引入双向激励机制的微分博弈模型。基于“局部-整体”视角,分析在不同情形下局部主体的最优策略以及系统收益,并结合数字化赋能案例进行仿真分析。研究结果表明:①双向激励机制显著提高了专精特新企业和龙头企业的资源投入积极性,且政府的最优补贴与收益分配系数相关。②系统收益受到龙头企业初始声誉的显著影响,当初始声誉较高时,在竞争主导型关系中,收益随时间推移而递减,而在其他情形下随时间推移而增长。③存在一个关于系统初始数字化存量的阈值,当初始存量大于阈值时,系统数字化水平随时间推移而递减,反之,随时间推移而递增。④专精特新企业与龙头企业的技术溢出效应,在不同竞合情形下对双方资源投入均有促进作用。

关键词: 专精特新企业, 数字化生态系统, 微分博弈, 竞合关系

Abstract: SRDI (Specialized, Refined, Differential, Innovation) enterprises can alleviate resource constraints in digital transformation by leveraging the capabilities of leading enterprises. However, as participants in the ecosystem, they face the challenge of managing coopetition relationships with these leading firms. Given the dynamic and persistent nature of digital resource investment, this paper establishes differential game models for a digital ecosystem with leading enterprises, SRDI enterprises, and local governments as core participants, considering three scenarios: competition-dominated, cooperation-dominated, and one with incentive mechanism. From a “part-whole” perspective, this paper analyzes the optimal strategies of local agents and system benefits under different situations. Furthermore, a simulation analysis is conducted based on a case study of LCFC’s digital empowerment on SRDI enterprises. The findings indicate: (1) The incentive mechanism has significantly improved the enthusiasm of SRDI and leading enterprises for resource investment, and the government’s optimal subsidy level is correlated with the profit distribution coefficient. (2) System benefits are considerably influenced by the initial reputation of the leading enterprise. When initial reputation is high, benefits decline over time in competition-dominated relationships but increase in other scenarios. (3) There is a threshold in the initial digital stock of the system. If this threshold is exceeded, the digital level decreases over time; otherwise, it increases. (4) The technology spillover effects between SRDI enterprises and leading enterprises promote resource investment by both parties across different coopetitive scenarios.

Key words: SRDI enterprises, digital ecosystem, differential game, coopetition