面向“一带一路”企业技术标准联盟协同治理模式——基于“共商共建共享”理念

摘要/Abstract

摘要： “共商共建共享”全球治理观为面向“一带一路”企业技术标准联盟提供了新的治理方案。通过构建基于“共商共建共享”理念的技术标准联盟协同治理模式，在刻画“共商共建共享”理念在联盟治理过程中的践行程度并衡量联盟合作绩效的基础上，实证检验了联盟“共商共建共享”治理对合作绩效的影响程度，并通过响应面分析识别支持联盟高绩效的共商共建共享协同治理特征。研究发现：联盟共商、共建治理与合作绩效呈显著正相关关系，共享通过共商、共建对绩效产生正向作用；响应技术、经济、社会、战略等不同层次绩效的共商共建共享协同治理模式也各有不同。这表明，践行共商共建共享理念，对面向“一带一路”企业技术标准联盟取得合作绩效具有重要作用，通过“共商共建共享”协同治理可促进企业技术标准联盟合作多层次绩效目标实现。

关键词: “一带一路”倡议, 技术标准联盟, 共商共建共享, 协同治理, 合作绩效

Abstract: The global governance principles of “extensive consultation, joint construction and shared benefits” provide a new governance solution for the “Belt and Road” Enterprise Technical Standard Alliance (BRTSA). First of all, this paper constructs a collaborative governance model of the BRTSA based on the above-mentioned principles. Secondly, the degree of implementation of each governance principle in the alliance governance process and four kinds of BRTSA cooperation performance are evaluated respectively. Finally, the paper empirically tests the impact of alliance governance on cooperation performance, and uses Response Surface Analysis method to illustrate different modes of collaborative governance, which engage alliance members to commit to “extensive consultation, joint construction and shared benefits” principles could couple with higher technical, economic, social or strategic performance of cooperation activities. It is found that governance principles of “extensive consultation” and “joint contribution” have a significant positive correlation with cooperation performance, and “shared benefits” has a positive effect on performance through “extensive consultation” and “joint contribution”. The collaborative governance modes that respond to higher technical, economic, social or strategic performance of cooperation are also different. These findings imply that the alliance governance which uphold the principles of extensive consultation, joint construction, and shared benefits plays an important role in achieving cooperation performances of BRTSA, and the choice of collaborative governance modes in response to different performances should also be tailored to the specific circumstance.

Key words: the “Belt and Road” initiative, technical standards alliance, extensive consultation, joint construction and shared benefits, collaborative governance, cooperation performance

王东鹏, 周青, 杨伟. 面向“一带一路”企业技术标准联盟协同治理模式——基于“共商共建共享”理念[J]. 管理评论, 2026, 38(4): 117-130.

Wang Dongpeng, Zhou Qing, Yang Wei. Collaborative Governance Modes of the Enterprise Technical Standard Alliances for the “Belt and Road”: Based on the Principles of “Extensive Consultation, Joint Contribution, and Shared Benefits”[J]. Management Review, 2026, 38(4): 117-130.

参考文献

[1] 周青,吴童祯,杨伟,等. 面向“一带一路”企业技术标准联盟的驱动因素与作用机制研究——基于文本挖掘和程序化扎根理论融合方法[J]. 南开管理评论, 2021,24(3):150-161 Zhou Q., Wu T. Z., Yang W., et al. Research on Driving Factors and Mechanisms of Enterprise Technology Standard Alliance for the “Belt and Road” Initiative—Based on the Integration of Text Mining and Programmatic Grounded Theory[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2021,24(3):150-161
[2] 王义桅. 回应:关于“一带一路”的十种声音[M]. 天津: 天津人民出版社, 2020 Wang Y. W. Response: Ten Voices on the “Belt and Road Initiative”[M]. Tianjin: Tianjin People’s Publishing House, 2020
[3] Blind K. Standardization and Standards: Safeguards of Technological Sovereignty？[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2025,210:123873
[4] 周青,吴童祯,杨伟,等. 面向“一带一路”的企业技术标准联盟模式研究[J]. 管理评论, 2021,33(2):108-119 Zhou Q., Wu T. Z., Yang W., et al. Research on Mode of Enterprise Technical Standards Alliance for the “Belt and Road” Initiative Based on Proceduralised Grounded Theory[J]. Management Review, 2021,33(2):108-119
[5] 周青,吴正熠,陈文冲. 面向“一带一路”制造技术标准竞争扩散的双边网络协同优化[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2024,44(12):3917-3931 Zhou Q., Wu Z. Y., Chen W. C. Two-sided Network Coordination for Competition-based Manufacturing Technology Standard Diffusion along “Belt and Road” Markets[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2024,44(12):3917-3931
[6] 周青,陈静,杨伟,等. 后发企业如何提升国际技术标准话语权？——中车株洲所的探索性案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2023,39(7):82-100 Zhou Q., Chen J., Yang W., et al. How can Latecomer Enterprises Broaden Their Influence on International Technical Standard Setting: An Exploratory Case Study of CRRC Zhuzhou Institute[J]. Journal of Management World, 2023,39(7):82-100
[7] 王黎萤,王举铎,黄灿,等. 基于标准竞合创新网络的组织合法性获取研究——以新一代信息技术领军跨国企业为例[J]. 科学学研究, 2024,42(10):2228-2240 Wang L. Y., Wang J. D., Huang C., et al. Research on Organizational Legitimacy Acquisition Based on Standard Competition and Cooperation Innovation Network—Taking the Leading Multinational Enterprises in the New Generation of Information Technology as an Example[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2024,42(10):2228-2240
[8] Hu J., Wang Y., Liu S., et al. Mechanism of Latecomer Enterprises’ Technological Catch-up in Technical Standards Alliances-An Ambidextrous Innovation Perspective[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2023,154(1):113321
[9] Abrams E., Leone P. V., Cambrosio A., et al. The Governance of Open Science: A Comparative Analysis of Two Open Science Consortia[J]. Research Policy, 2025,54(3):105195
[10] Schott L., Schaefer K. J. Acceptance of Chinese Latecomers’ Technological Contributions in International ICT Standardization-The Role of Origin, Experience and Collaboration[J]. Research Policy, 2023,52(1):104656
[11] Wu Y. H., de Vries H. J. Effects of Participation in Standardization on Firm Performance from a Network Perspective: Evidence from China[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022,175:121376
[12] Wen J. Y., Qualls W. J., Zeng D. M. Standardization Alliance Networks, Standard-Setting Influence, and New Product Outcomes[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2020,37(2):138-157
[13] Johansson M., Kärreman M., Foukaki A. Research and Development Resources, Coopetitive Performance and Cooperation: The Case of Standardization in 3GPP, 2004-2013[J]. Technovation, 2019,88:102074
[14] Chesbrough H., Heaton S., Mei L. Open Innovation with Chinese Characteristics: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective[J]. R&D Management, 2021,51(3):247-259
[15] Schulhof V., van Vuuren D., Kirchherr J. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): What will It Look Like in the Future？[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022,175:121306
[16] 董琴. 中国参与全球治理的“守正”与“拓展”:基于标准化视角[J]. 经济学家, 2023,(1):87-97 Dong Q. “Integrity” and “Expansion” of China’s Participation in Global Governance: Based on the Perspective of Standardization[J]. Economist, 2023,(1):87-97
[17] Cao Z., Lumineau F. Revisiting the Interplay between Contractual and Relational Governance: A Qualitative and Meta-analytic Investigation[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2015,33-34（1）:15-42
[18] Poppo L., Zenger T. Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or Complements？[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2002,23(8):707-725
[19] 陶平生. 全球治理视角下共建“一带一路”国际规则的遵循、完善和创新[J]. 管理世界, 2020,36(5):161-171 Tao P. S. Abidance, Improvement and Innovation of Jointly Building the Belt and Road International Rules from the Perspective of Global Governance[J]. Journal of Management World, 2020,36(5):161-171
[20] Ansell C., Gash A. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2008,18(4):543-571
[21] Emerson K., Nabatchi T., Balogh S. An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2012,22(1):1-29
[22] 王新影. 中国参与全球治理的历史进程及前景展望[J]. 马克思主义研究, 2019,(1):120-129 Wang X. Y. The Historical Course and Prospect of China’s Participation in Global Governance[J]. Studies on Marxism, 2019,(1):120-129
[23] 秦亚青,魏玲. 新型全球治理观与“一带一路”合作实践[J]. 外交评论, 2018,35(2):1-14 Qin Y. Q., Wei L. The New Global Governance Concept and the Practice of the Belt and Road Cooperation[J]. Foreign Affairs Review, 2018,35(2):1-14
[24] 蒋冠宏. 中国企业对“一带一路”沿线国家市场的进入策略[J]. 中国工业经济, 2017,(9):119-136 Jiang G. H. The Strategy of Market Access about Chinese Firms in the Countries of the Belt and Road Initiatives[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2017,(9):119-136
[25] 周茂,武家辉,李雨浓,等. 共建“一带一路”与互联互通深化——基于沿线国家间的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2023,39(11):1-21 Zhou M., Wu J. H., Li Y. N., et al. The Joint Construction of the Belt and Road Initiative and Deepening Interconnection: Based on the Perspective of Interconnections among Countries along the Route[J]. Journal of Management World, 2023,39(11):1-21
[26] Grégoire-Zawilski M., Popp D. Do Technology Standards Induce Innovation in Environmental Technologies When Coordination Is Important?[J]. Research Policy, 2024,53(1):104888
[27] 周青,高延孝,杨伟. 面向“一带一路”企业技术标准联盟治理组态研究——基于“共商共建共享”理念[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2025,46(2):76-93 Zhou Q., Gao Y. X., Yang W. The Governance Configurations of Enterprise Technical Standards Alliance for the Belt and Road: Based on Conception of “Extensive Consultation, Joint Contribution, and Shared Benefits”[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 2025,46(2):76-93
[28] Berardo R., Fischer M., Hamilton M. Collaborative Governance and the Challenges of Network-Based Research[J]. The American Review of Public Administration, 2020,50(8):898-913
[29] Wegner D., Sarturi G., Klein L. L. The Governance of Strategic Networks: How do Different Configurations Influence the Performance of Member Firms?[J]. Journal of Management and Governance, 2022,26(3):1063-1087
[30] 张业遂. 共建“一带一路”谋求合作共赢[J]. 求是, 2015,(10):20-21 Zhang Y. S. Jointly Building the Belt and Road and Striving for Win-Win Cooperation[J]. Qiushi, 2015,(10):20-21
[31] Hahm H., Raihan S. The Belt and Road Initiative: Maximizing Benefits, Managing Risks—A Computable General Equilibrium Approach[J]. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 2018,2(1):97-115
[32] Chen J., Di Minin A., Minshall T., et al. The New Silk Road: R&D Networks, Knowledge Diffusions, and Open Innovation[J]. R&D Management, 2021,51(3):243-246
[33] 唐晓阳,唐溪源. 从政府推动走向市场主导:海外产业园区的可持续发展路径[J]. 外交评论, 2019,36(6):39-61 Tang X. Y., Tang X. Y. From Government Initiative to Market Orientation: The Path of Sustainable Development of Overseas Industrial Zones[J]. Foreign Affairs Review, 2019,36(6):39-61
[34] 张丽平,蓝庆新. 以资本运作推动“一带一路”的互联互通建设[J]. 南开学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016,(1):71-76 Zhang L. P., Lan Q. X. Promoting through Capital Operation the Construction of Connectivity System under “One Belt and One Road” Initiative[J]. Journal of Nankai University (Philosophy, Literature and Social), 2016,(1):71-76
[35] 刘晓丹. “一带一路”中的文化交流[J]. 人民论坛, 2018,(33):134-135 Liu X. D. Cultural Exchange along the Belt and Road[J]. People’s Tribune, 2018,(33):134-135
[36] Piercey P., Saunders C., Doloreux D. The Sensitivity of Innovation Modes to Distance: Can We Go the Distance？[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2025,210:123891
[37] 丁浩员,李怡,靳玉英. “一带一路”倡议、市场进入与企业长期经济绩效[J]. 管理科学学报, 2024,27(7):118-141 Ding H. Y., Li Y., Jin Y. Y. The Belt and Road Initiative, Market Entry, and Long-term Firm Performance[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2024,27(7):118-141
[38] Chang W., Xue C. Q., Chen Y. Conflicts and Compromise: Using of Chinese Standards in China-Aided Stadium Projects after 2000[J]. International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications, 2020,6(2):27-33
[39] Rühlig T. The Shape of Things to Come: The Race to Control Technical Standardisation[R]. The Swedish Institute of International Affairs. Stockholm, 2021
[40] Sorina T. The Geopolitics of Digital Standards: China’s Role in Standard-Setting Organisations[R]. Diplo Foundation/Geneva Internet Platform & Multilateral Dialogue Konrad Adenauer Foundation. Geneva, 2021