管理评论

管理评论 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 3-14.

• 经济与金融管理 •    下一篇

非农收入、土地流转与农户农业生产性投资

葛岩1, 吴海霞2   

  1. 1. 中央财经大学财政税务学院, 北京 100081;
    2. 中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所, 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-06 出版日期:2023-08-28 发布日期:2023-10-07
  • 通讯作者: 吴海霞(通讯作者),中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所副研究员,博士
  • 作者简介:葛岩,中央财经大学财政税务学院副教授,博士
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年项目(72003215)；国家自然科学基金面上项目(71973087)；陕西省科技厅软科学项目(2022KRM131)。

Non-agricultural Income, Land Transfer and Farmers' Agricultural Productive Investment

Ge Yan1, Wu Haixia2   

  1. 1. School of Public Finance and Tax, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081;
    2. Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081
  • Received:2021-05-06 Online:2023-08-28 Published:2023-10-07

PDF (PC)

174

摘要： 全国范围内快速发展的城镇化进程和土地流转市场改变着农户的就业结构和收入结构,亦对农户的生产结构和要素配置产生冲击。基于CFPS2018年25个省、市、自治区的8446个农户样本数据,将农户农业生产投资分为流动资产投资和固定资产投资两大类,从农户非农收入和土地流转的视角,考察其对农户流动资产投资和固定资产投资的影响。结果表明:第一,非农收入对农户流动资产投资与固定资产投资均呈现显著的负向影响,其中非农收入对农户短期流动资产投资影响更大;第二,土地转出户倾向于减少农业流动资产和固定资产投资,而土地转入则对农户农业流动资产和固定资产投资产生显著的正向影响;第三,非农收入与土地流转间存在显著的内生性,考虑内生性后,土地转出对农户流动性资产投资没有显著影响,对农户固定资产投资的负向影响依然稳健;而土地转入使得农户因土地规模的扩大会进一步加大农业流动性资产和固定资产投资。

关键词: 非农收入, 土地流转, 流动资产投资, 固定资产投资

Abstract: The flourish urbanization process and land transfer markets have changed the employment and revenue structure in China, thereby producing an impact on the production structure and factor configuration of farmers. Based on the 8,446 farmer sample data of 25 provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions from CFPS database in 2018, we divide farmers' agricultural production investment into two categories:liquid asset investment and fixed asset investment and then explore what impacts farmers' non-agricultural income and land transfer have on farmers' investment in liquid and fixed assets. The findings are as follows. First, non-agricultural income has a significant negative impact on farmers' investment in liquid and fixed assets, and the impact on farmers' investment in short-term liquid assets is more significant. Second, the farmers from whom land is transferred out tend to reduce agricultural liquid and fixed asset investment, while land transfer-in has a significant positive impact on farmers' investment in both kinds of assets. Third, there is a significant endogeneity between non-agricultural income and land transfer, and if this is taken into account, land transfer-out has no significant impact on farmers' investment in liquid assets, but still has a significant negative impact on farmers' investment in fixed assets. By contrast, land transfer-in motivates land-receiving farmers to invest more in agricultural liquid and fixed assets.

Key words: non-agricultural income, land transfer, liquid asset investment, fixed asset investment